- Joined
- Nov 2, 2019
- Messages
- 6,695
- Reaction score
- 9,706
That's weird logic. I'm not suggesting you risk half your bankroll or something insane. But you only want to risk 2% of it on something you think has a 60% chance of hitting and you're getting paid almost 4-1?
Also, the statement "if I bet a fighter every time I believed there was value on their ML I'd go broke quickly"...huh? That makes absolutely zero sense unless you're literally saying you suck at assessing when there's value. Why would you go broke quickly when betting fighters that have value LMAO? That's actually specifically how you grow a bankroll, not shrink it.
On the most recent PFL card three massive favorites (Loughnane, Khizriev, Berkhamov) all won by split decision so there was clearly value on the underdogs in every single one of those fights. However, if I had bet the underdog in each of those fights and risked 2u on each (or more as you are suggesting) just because I believed their was some value on the underdogs ML; I would still be out at least 6% of my bankroll.
The value does not get there most of the time
You can make 20 bets and every single one of them can be a good bet, where there was clearly value on the underdog, but if none of those bets get there you are still out a good chunk of your bankroll. That is why it is so important to choose your spots carefully and put your money in a strong position to win.
Hopefully this makes sense.