UFC 217 - Bisping vs GSP - NYC

[betrayedlurker]

I was at the first Bisping / Rockhold fight and agree with what you say about Bispings defensive grappling. Also... I kind of agree with you about Kennedy... he looked average post USADA gassing within 1 round and having nothing. I personally don’t think GSP can replicate pre USADA Kennedy.

Respect to you as well. I can't believe people are still betting GSP. Simply should not be the fav.

 

[iGnP]

Even though I like Cody here, had to put a bit on TJ dec at +331. Hope lines come down so I can use it moreso as a hedge to Cody action, if not I will cheer for Cody and it will hedge my happiness as @Antagonist88 put it. haha.

Where'd you get +331

Edit damnit 5d. I already bet him at +275

 

[Stunna77]

Go reread the post. I wasn't mocking. I was simply stating my opinion that a -400 or -500 fighter might not be the way to play this card with so many other spots. Sorry u got offended by that mega douche post. U even clarified right after you were not advising a play on a -400 guy essentially agreeing with the post you took offense to

False, you stated "I see little reason to debate if a -400 fighter is a good bet". Maybe someone wants to play olenik, would it be fair to discuss the fight then? Or maybe you could give us a list of fights acceptable to discuss? That would be neat.

 

[SBJJ]

Respect to you as well. I can't believe people are still betting GSP. Simply should not be the fav.

I understand it. Don't agree but I get it.

Some fine cappers in here like him

I just have a feeling after its done we will be saying why didn't we all smash Bisping

Now watch GSP superman punch Bisping out cold in the first

 

[Papi]

Not everyone writes a screenplay for every fight. Also sorry you didn't have the energy to actually go through the thread and read the contributions on other fights.

From now on U and I can just discuss -500 dudes and if they might be worth a play. Maybe 50 to win 10. Then we can go to Subway and get a couple of subs with our winnings. I'll even buy the chips and sodas

Free subs courtesy of jj and cutelaba!!! I will take a cold cut trio

 

[betrayedlurker]

I understand it. Don't agree but I get it.

Some fine cappers in here like him

I just have a feeling after its done we will be saying why didn't we all smash Bisping

Now watch GSP superman punch Bisping out cold in the first

If GSP wins, I still won't regret betting Bisping. But if GSP has a delusional return like Ronda and epicly fails like I suspect, I would definitely regret not smashing Bisping. Had to take +120.

 

[SBJJ]

False, you stated "I see little reason to debate if a -400 fighter is a good bet". Maybe someone wants to play olenik, would it be fair to discuss the fight then? Or maybe you could give us a list of fights acceptable to discuss? That would be neat.

Uhhhh. Would betting Olenik be betting a -400 fighter?

And now you are saying I'm trying to censor people from my Mega Douche post?

Have u been reading posts in here long? The fact that post got you so bothered is kinda crazy.

I even offered to buy u chips and a drink after your Smug posts. And then the name calling. You know what they say when people start the name calling.

Look, I get it. You were debating for Blaydes after getting him at the open. Then you took offense to my rather mild post because you thought I was mocking a play on Blaydes. Then you actually agreed with me that Blaydes had no value left at his inflated price. So u imagined this douche tint to my post that was never there. So you shot off your Smug responses and then when I offered to buy you some lunch you called me a douche

Was that a long enough write up?

 

[SBJJ]

Free subs courtesy of jj and cutelaba!!! I will take a cold cut trio

I'm a vegetarian. But will gladly buy everyone there choice of sub if Bisping wins.

But not Stunna. I take back my offer. As I can not buy lunch for someone who abuses me with names and implies I am not coherent. I AM COHERENT...most of the time

 

[Stunna77]

Uhhhh. Would betting Olenik be betting a -400 fighter?

And now you are saying I'm trying to censor people from my Mega Douche post?

Have u been reading posts in here long? The fact that post got you so bothered is kinda crazy.

I even offered to buy u chips and a drink after your Smug posts. And then the name calling. You know what they say when people start the name calling.

Look, I get it. You were debating for Blaydes after getting him at the open. Then you took offense to my rather mild post because you thought I was mocking a play on Blaydes. Then you actually agreed with me that Blaydes had no value left at his inflated price. So u imagined this douche tint to my post that was never there. So you shot off your Smug responses and then when I offered to buy you some lunch you called me a douche

Was that a long enough write up?

Pretty incoherent, but like the effort. I could care less if you mock a play on someone, again that is not why I called you out. You called people out for discussing the fight, i.e. debating betting a -400 fighter. Either way, not really that important, you can go back to the one sentence posts, those were actually less annoying in hindsight.

 

[waiguoren]

I'm a vegetarian.

Oh snap, I respect you more now

 

[Barkus]

I was at the first Bisping / Rockhold fight and agree with what you say about Bispings defensive grappling. Also... I kind of agree with you about Kennedy... he looked average post USADA gassing within 1 round and having nothing. I personally don’t think GSP can replicate pre USADA Kennedy.

Post USADA GSP won't replicate pre USADA Kennedy.

 

[And]

I'm surprised/disappointed in Ramos line. I expected him to be the underdog.

I'm definitely hitting both Dillashaw ML +155 and Dec +331.

 

[Gugabe]

I'll be surprised if Dillashaw makes it to a decision in a losing effort against Cody. I'm considering doing a TJ ML/Cody KO hedge, since I just don't see TJ's chin holding up if Cody's landing consistently and hard enough to win a decision.

I'm also tempted by the under in GSP/Bisping. I feel like this is going to be a fight in which one of the two massive question marks looks /old/ as hell, and that it won't be entertaining by any means. Either GSP's going to come back shoddy, or it's going to be apparent that it's the same old Michael Bisping as it was prior to the miracle comeback against Rockhold, but a Bisping who's aged as hell.

 

[NorthernLights]

Ohmbet has "Winner by decision" for Bisping/GSP @ 1.87...Meanwhile "Fight goes the distance" is 1.65. I guess a draw always COULD happen but I'm happy to take that risk at those odds.

 

[chemmy]

I'll be surprised if Dillashaw makes it to a decision in a losing effort against Cody. I'm considering doing a TJ ML/Cody KO hedge, since I just don't see TJ's chin holding up if Cody's landing consistently and hard enough to win a decision.

I'm also tempted by the under in GSP/Bisping. I feel like this is going to be a fight in which one of the two massive question marks looks /old/ as hell, and that it won't be entertaining by any means. Either GSP's going to come back shoddy, or it's going to be apparent that it's the same old Michael Bisping as it was prior to the miracle comeback against Rockhold, but a Bisping who's aged as hell.

I can possibly see a late TKO by Bisping, but even in scenario #2 I don't think GSP getting a stoppage is very likely. I like the over quite a bit myself and got it at -123. I'm happy with the play.

 

[SBJJ]

Pretty incoherent, but like the effort. I could care less if you mock a play on someone, again that is not why I called you out. You called people out for discussing the fight, i.e. debating betting a -400 fighter. Either way, not really that important, you can go back to the one sentence posts, those were actually less annoying in hindsight.

Why are you trying to stop people from just posting 1 or 2 sentences? See how silly that is?

Saying there are better spots than debating if betting a -400 fighter is stopping debate? Lol. Do you read the posts in here?

Ok. I apologize. U are right I was a douche to think betting a -400 guy was not best for this event. So the floor is all yours! Let the Free Debate begin. What -400 or -500 fighters do you like this card and why?

 

[SBJJ]

Post USADA GSP won't replicate pre USADA Kennedy.

Agree

 

[SBJJ]

I can possibly see a late TKO by Bisping, but even in scenario #2 I don't think GSP getting a stoppage is very likely. I like the over quite a bit myself and got it at -123. I'm happy with the play.

Probably gonna sprinkle Bisping 4/5

 

[Stunna77]

Why are you trying to stop people from just posting 1 or 2 sentences? See how silly that is?

Saying there are better spots than debating if betting a -400 fighter is stopping debate? Lol. Do you read the posts in here?

Ok. I apologize. U are right I was a douche to think betting a -400 guy was not best for this event. So the floor is all yours! Let the Free Debate begin. What -400 or -500 fighters do you like this card and why?

Holy shit reading comprehension is not your strong suit. I am acutally mad at myself for even bringing it up at this point. I will take the L to move on.

 

[SBJJ]

Holy shit reading comprehension is not your strong suit. I am acutally mad at myself for even bringing it up at this point. I will take the L to move on.

GOOD ONE! More insults. That works every time

No L. You got a subway lunch coming!