U.S. on track to take in 70k refugees for this year

ripskater said:
It seems as if this administration is trying to take down our own country.
Click to expand...

This has always been going on rip.
you won't find an administration in the last 40 years who hasn't taken in refugees.
 
ripskater said:
As long as they are not Muslims, then I'm fine with it. No offense to the Muslims who are good people, but it's too dangerous to take them in.

They should probably go somewhere else in the world. The USA is gonna be seeing hard times in the near future.
Click to expand...

If they're good people, why is it dangerous to take them in?
 
clmetal said:
They are also in Minneapolis and Maine, both know for being generous with welfare for refugees
Click to expand...

I'm from Maine and we got a lot of Somalis about 10 years ago. Terrible, rude, antisocial people who chose the area based on our easy to abuse welfare system.
 
Anung Un Rama said:
If they're good people, why is it dangerous to take them in?
Click to expand...

I said this. If they are good people, then they are an asset to the country. I just said that it's too risky to be taking in Muslims. Stuff like the Boston bombing and all the military bases shootings are by muslims lately.
 
ripskater said:
As long as they are not Muslims, then I'm fine with it. No offense to the Muslims who are good people, but it's too dangerous to take them in.

They should probably go somewhere else in the world. The USA is gonna be seeing hard times in the near future.
Click to expand...

the thing that saves america, is that america won't tolerate sharia bullshit. and it especially won't tolerate anything close to it after 9/11. we're not pussy europe. no offense to the europeans on this forum lol.
 
IIIIIIII said:
the thing that saves america, is that america won't tolerate sharia bullshit. and it especially won't tolerate anything close to it after 9/11. we're not pussy europe. no offense to the europeans on this forum lol.
Click to expand...

Americans tolerate everything now because we're afraid someone will call us bigots. Its sad what we've become.
 
DIEversity. Coming to your neighborhood. Diversity bombing your neighborhoods brought to you by the 1965 immigration act by Cellar and Javits. The freshman Senator drunkard Ted Kennedy was just a frontman, useful idiot.
 
Da Speeit said:
Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:
I lift my lamp beside the golden door

p.s. whites only
Click to expand...

fixed
 
The USA can absorb a million or so refugees a year from a diverse collection of countries. Bigger issue is a defacto Mexican invasion.
 
Immigrants should stay in their own country and try to make it a better place. Stop the cycle, don't run away from it.
 
ALAN PARTRIDGE said:
Why the Hell is it our Problem???
Click to expand...

Why was WWII our problem? Why is world hunger our problem? Developed countries and people of means in general have an obligation to the human race. If innocent people are subject to incredibly dangerous or oppressive conditions, and we can accommodate them without great loss, we should. You're acting like every citizen of a multi-billion-person region is trying to uphold the conditions of that region.

It doesn't affect you right now, but a reasonable human being should worry about it. Hey, an ethnic group is getting shoved into gas chamber and ovens....so what? Not our problem.
 
ripskater said:
I said this. If they are good people, then they are an asset to the country. I just said that it's too risky to be taking in Muslims. Stuff like the Boston bombing and all the military bases shootings are by muslims lately.
Click to expand...

You said they were good people but that it was dangerous to let them in. If they're good people then why are they dangerous?
 
speakhandsforme said:
Why was WWII our problem? Why is world hunger our problem? Developed countries and people of means in general have an obligation to the human race. If innocent people are subject to incredibly dangerous or oppressive conditions, and we can accommodate them without great loss, we should. You're acting like every citizen of a multi-billion-person region is trying to uphold the conditions of that region.

It doesn't affect you right now, but a reasonable human being should worry about it. Hey, an ethnic group is getting shoved into gas chamber and ovens....so what? Not our problem.
Click to expand...

Well I'm from the U.K by the way and I say just forget them
 
ripskater said:
as long as they are not muslims, then i'm fine with it. No offense to the muslims who are good people, but it's too dangerous to take them in.

They should probably go somewhere else in the world. The usa is gonna be seeing hard times in the near future.
Click to expand...

didn't know the us made a pledge to take in 70 thousand refugees from somalia, congo, iraq among other countries for this fiscal year.
Click to expand...

:):):)

Good ole' Murka always absorbing from the best countries.
 
ALAN PARTRIDGE said:
Well I'm from the U.K by the way and I say just forget them
Click to expand...

Well, us Muricans identify best with the British (who by the way also participated in WWII just fyi), so no matter what nationality you are, you're a bad person and an irresponsible member of our species.
 
fast and furious, the terrorist addition
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,237,027
Messages
55,462,293
Members
174,786
Latest member
Santos FC 1912

Share this page

Back
Top