Crime Two Minnesota Lawmakers Shot

Really? I just did a search on the story and not one article referred to him as an associate of Walz. I don't have Twitter, but I guarantee the algorithm of someone who uses Twitter for right wing news is going to come up with a guy who is trying to pin this in the left.
I don't follow any news sources. I like to browse everything I can on a subject. That's what was coming up. Saying he was a Tim Wall appointee isn't pinning it on the left. It was just a fact that was being repeated.

But regardless of that, do you think the right wingers in this thread, who are using the connection to Walz as pinning this on Democrats/the left, are as you put it sick fucks?
I don't see anybody pushing their agenda as hard as Sinister was, but yes I do. I said as much in my post.

yeah because he drove his car into the crowd trying to kill them lol for the record,
He was at a full stop when the shooting happened.

you just described everyone who came into contact with kyle rittenhouse the night he killed 2 people.
So you literally know nothing about that case. Got it.

so again, you don't give a single shit about violence if you disagree with a person politically. we've derailed this enough. political violence is rarely necessary, but sometimes it is.
The irony here is incredible.
 
Ok... WTF

Today... "There is no Spoon"


Yesterday...


"We'll release the documents shortly..."

this-is-fine_custom-b7c50c845a78f5d7716475a92016d52655ba3115.jpg
 
Ok... WTF

Today... "There is no Spoon"


Yesterday...


"We'll release the documents shortly..."

this-is-fine_custom-b7c50c845a78f5d7716475a92016d52655ba3115.jpg

He's basically saying there's no in depth manifesto like the Unabomber had. Instead he had notebooks detailing his plans as well as a hitlist.

Also confirms there was only Democrat politicians on the list as well pro-choice targets.
 
Nope. My argument wasn't about one side or both sides politicizing this. It was about false information and false narratives being spread.
Yeah, for political reasons, and according to you, it's not happening on the left because you have only ever seen six or seven right winger Instagram accounts doing it. That was your "proof" to deny that it was happening with the left all the same. That is what you used to say it wasn't happening on "both sides".

Like I said, your reasoning is beyond retarded, and is why you're all flustered right now. Liberals absolutely hate having their "logic" checked.
 
When i point out the leftist retards with this POV, it's guys like this one.


awww poor little maga muppet. did pointing out your bullshit pinch a nerve? the registered republican who shot molestini cheetolini was in fact a registered republican. instead of trying to flip the script and invent your own whackadoodle narrative, perhaps you should learn to deal with it sweetheart.
 
Seems like we should be investing more money into healthcare instead of slashing it and appointing a fucking nutjob to run the dept of HHS, huh?
 
Yeah, for political reasons, and according to you, it's not happening on the left because you have only ever seen six or seven right winger Instagram accounts doing it. That was your "proof" to deny that it was happening with the left all the same. That is what you used to say it wasn't happening on "both sides".

Like I said, your reasoning is beyond retarded, and is why you're all flustered right now. Liberals absolutely hate having their "logic" checked.
You have massive comprehension issues that neither I nor Alpha Dad can help you with. My issue was never with politicizing this. It was the intentional pushing of a false narrative I had an issue with. I am only talking specifically to this event and this thread, too. Which is why I took umbrage with someone trying to 'both sides' this. I don't care if "both sides do it" outside the context of this event. I never argued otherwise.

I also love this 'six or seven' thing you also made up. I only brought up the stuff I saw on IG being from actual people I know because your dumbass tried to claim I was ripping them from an algorithm in an echo chamber.

You're still completely missing the crux of my argument, but it seems like I cant help you with that.

Dork.
 
The hot potato act by the right on this is predictable.
The deflections, hypocrisy and lack of self awareness from the maga clown brigade as more details come out are always hilarious.

"Typical violent dem, he had no kings fliers!" > *reports show he is a registered republican* > "we dont know his political affiliation is relevant"

"Tim Walz appointee!" > *carry-over appointee for non-political bipartisan position* > "Anyone making this political is a scumbag" > *incessantly repeat irrelevant Tim Walz "connection"*
 
I don't follow any news sources. I like to browse everything I can on a subject. That's what was coming up. Saying he was a Tim Wall appointee isn't pinning it on the left. It was just a fact that was being repeated.


I don't see anybody pushing their agenda as hard as Sinister was, but yes I do. I said as much in my post.


He was at a full stop when the shooting happened.


So you literally know nothing about that case. Got it.


The irony here is incredible.
Are you browsing or are you being force fed partisan propaganda? Also there is a difference between what an appointee and an associate and clearly this guy chose his words the way he did for a reason as it implies a much more close relationship. And the semantics are definitely working as there are many people in this thread that are trying to use this connection to say this is the responsibility of the left. But at least you had the decency to consider the people in this thread trying to push the narrative that this is the responsibility of the left as sick fucks as well.
 
I don't follow any news sources. I like to browse everything I can on a subject. That's what was coming up. Saying he was a Tim Wall appointee isn't pinning it on the left. It was just a fact that was being repeated.
Nobody just repeats facts, in this context these facts are cited as possible clues as to what his political affiliation and motivation were.

To point out that he was appointed by Walz and that the targeted lawmakers voted against their party a few days ago is to imply that he was a Democrat party loyalist who attacked these lawmakers for being disloyal to the party.

That's misleading though. The board he was appointed to has 60 seats, is non-partisan, and the suspect had been appointed by the previous governor which would suggest Walz was retaining an appointee that was installed by a previous governor rather than having some special relationship to him. And there's no indication that the vote being pointed to by right wing Twitter had anything to do with the shooting.

Instead one can look to the fact that his roommate claims he's a Trump voter and pro-life and that the two lawmakers are pro-choice with other pro-choice targets on the list, based off which its likely that he's an anti-abortion extremist.
 
Back
Top