Crime Two Minnesota Lawmakers Shot

No. This is wrong. We don't sic the military on citizens. You and me? I don't give a fuck. I can hit a 3 inch group at 300 yds with my Rem 700. .308 Rem

I said I don't agree with using regular forces but the guard is for that. However despite what people are saying this is not the first time regular forces have been used. Do you disagree with their use when they were used to enforce civil rights.
 
From the people that brought you: "Trump's assassination attempt was made by a right-winger"
We are proud to present: "Tim Walz appointee wasn't a left-winger"

This post is the product of hyper-partisan programming. In your fantasy World anyone who does a crime is automatically a "leftist" despite that I'd wager you dont know what that even means. There's no chance they're a right winger even if they're a registered Republican, even if they voted for Donald Trump, even if they're an Evangelical, etc. And if the person died wearing a MAGA hat and gold Trump sneakers, you'd likely contend that they were REALLY a leftist who just wanted to make MAGA look bad. And if there is clear evidence they're MAGA, well then it's the fault of Democrats for being too provocative, leading to regular people having reason to flip out and kill them.

It's the same old bootlicking story every time. Agenda above all else.
 
I said I don't agree with using regular forces but the guard is for that. However despite what people are saying this is not the first time regular forces have been used. Do you disagree with their use when they were used to enforce civil rights.

We are old. It's time to rest.

 


Enough already. Put any of these extremists on watchlists. They’re a danger to this country.

Who are "these extremists" and how do we identify them? Hopefully you have the balls to be specific about what you said.
 
I said I don't agree with using regular forces but the guard is for that. However despite what people are saying this is not the first time regular forces have been used. Do you disagree with their use when they were used to enforce civil rights.

In most instances you just named the guard were employed to protect the protestors. In many threads here debating the role of Government, people who actually know US History not through the eyes of revisionism understand that deploying National Guard or even active Military to suppress protestors is not normal in recent History. That only happened during worker uprisings and the last time it happened was during the riots in Hooverville:



Since then, and the era of civil rights expansion spread, the Guard have been deployed in times of power-imbalance to protect the people FROM State forces who were ignoring those rights under the guise of "preventing riots" which the Cops had a tendency of provoking. And as you saw in that clip, any time worker organization happens that "Commie agitator" sh*t gets thrown around. And judging by what I'm seeing online, nothing has changed.
 
Gotta hit you with an amazing song.....Nash was challenged to write a song in a minute. He did it.


 
Ever brought in sketchy shit across the border? Twin props are so much fun.

Last song. The best musician of that bunch. Fearless.

 
I said I don't agree with using regular forces but the guard is for that. However despite what people are saying this is not the first time regular forces have been used. Do you disagree with their use when they were used to enforce civil rights.
Strongly disagree, brother.
 
Back
Top