- Joined
- Mar 10, 2010
- Messages
- 26,253
- Reaction score
- 36,246
I think Leon made it, that you have to pay for your blue check mark.Doesn't Twitter have a blue tick for official accounts?
I think Leon made it, that you have to pay for your blue check mark.Doesn't Twitter have a blue tick for official accounts?
Wrong dumb ass it mentioned they changed their votes recently, it doesn’t say “ that’s why they were short “ dishonest loser
I could not care less about the political affiliation. This could still very well be some extremist from either side of the political aisle.it seems to me you’re the one worried that it may be a Democrat. It could be a Democrat, Republican, or none of the above.
You’re right, it could be anything at this point.Then why would it be breaking news needed to be shared after news of them being shot?
It is very clearly making a connection between the shooting and their recent votes.
I could care less about the political affiliation. This could still very well be some extremist from either side of the political aisle.
So again, what do you think the relevance of those facts are to this story? Are you suggesting that as a possible motive?What thoughts are you talking about? The fact that they voted with Republicans on no healthcare for illegals? That’s a fact Jack! Now you and I have no idea if that’s the motive. We’ll have to wait and see why the shooter’s motive was.
Look at the violent crowds.
Well, let me see. Today is no kings protest day. Two lawmakers were shot who sided with Republicans on immigration policies. These lawmakers happen to be Democrats. Don’t you think that’s enough clues to at least have some suspicions about it being politically motivated?So again, what do you think the relevance of those facts are to this story? Are you suggesting that as a possible motive?
Truly a lone wolf? Seems rather organized that people could have known or looked the other way? This just seems so strangeSupposed shooter. Putting it in spoiler cause it very well may be bullshit.
4chan has A TON on this guy already.
Africa connections, evangelical pastor, etc etc.
again, IT CAN VERY WELL BE BULLSHIT.
View attachment 1099320
He was just interviewing pro Russian people in Chicago a large Russian population lives in the area. He is one I just seen will look for others.What a lame example of cherry picking and deliberate ignorance.
like i said, there's zero confirmation. but the guy's cv is.....glowing, to use the vernacular.Truly a lone wolf? Seems rather organized that people could have known or looked the other way? This just seems so strange
I think the fact that they're politicians is reason enough to suspect that it's politically motivated but connecting it to that one vote seems like a huge stretch at this point.Well, let me see. Today is no kings protest day. Two lawmakers were murdered, who voted with a Republicans on immigration policies. These lawmakers happen to be democrats. Don’t you think that’s enough clues to at least have some suspicions about it being politically motivated?
Nah. Its somebody pointing out how your factual actions dont match your smokescreen declarations. However, carry on with throwing pebbles then hiding your hand without addressing any of the real criticisms. Then make up an imaginary rule set and inconsistent logic to make you feel like you won some sort of imaginary game. Textbook Seano.The fact that you find the idea of being moderate so alien kind of proves exactly what I said. Thanks.
If it was a white cop that just shot a black guy , the tone would be way differentWell, let me see. Today is no kings protest day. Two lawmakers were shot who sided with Republicans on immigration policies. These lawmakers happen to be Democrats. Don’t you think that’s enough clues to at least have some suspicions about it being politically motivated?
Not sure what your argument is here. I never said either or side did it, just that it appears to be politically motivated.
I think the fact that they're politicians is reason enough to suspect that it's politically motivated but connecting it to that one vote seems like a huge stretch at this point.
it would explain how someone got all that equipmentlike i said, there's zero confirmation. but the guy's cv is.....glowing, to use the vernacular.
i'll post it if it comes true that it's him.