- Joined
- May 11, 2014
- Messages
- 18,055
- Reaction score
- 37,512
if it pisses off tankies it's good praxis.Manufactured war? Russia invaded you imbecile.
I love that the USA support for Ukrainian pisses off the tankies...
if it pisses off tankies it's good praxis.Manufactured war? Russia invaded you imbecile.
I love that the USA support for Ukrainian pisses off the tankies...
You didn't really say much apart from Ukraine is a sovereign country. The rest was just you whining like a baby.
But anyway, I fail to see what point you're trying to make. Are you saying a sovereign country should never be invaded?
watching tankies parrot russian propaganda unironically is pretty damn funny.Nah I don't mind
It's more entertaining for me this way
Everyone Russia doesn't like is a Nazi.Tell me what threat the "nazis" in Ukraine had on Russia and why Putin needed to destroy the country and destroy everyone's life there, not to even mention the hundreds of thousands of causalities their own armed forces have suffered. Make it make sense.
You know that is not why he is there.. it's just a feeble lie supporters tell themselves to rationalize it.
Just like USA always wants to invade other countries for their own reasons.
I love that people are fine with that happening non stop, but as soon as Russia do it (to a shit hole full of Nazis and corruption who are suddenly painted up as saints), bitches start crying about it. Followed by cries of "but were not talking about the USA!".
And I said "manufactured", not "pretend". The war happened because Ukraine made it happen. Helped on by everyone else.
i think the issue was a real journalist isnt allowed access to putin for hours, instead they let a propogandist masquerading as a journalist go and do it..Western establishment wants only one side of a war getting press time. Regardless of the propaghanda aspect of Putin's interview, what is wrong in giving the other side a chance to air their version of events? Doesn't mean one supports the other side.
I am not seeing it as any different to letting Bin Laden explain why he attacked on 9-11. Doesn't mean one is pro Bin Laden / Al Qaeda.
funny how it's always the antiestablishment types that are propagandists.i think the issue was a real journalist isnt allowed access to putin for hours, instead they let a propogandist masquerading as a journalist go and do it..
Obviously Putin doesn't want a critical journalist, but that is kinda true for all leaders. Our Western MSM journalists never truly take our leaders to task, asking them hard pointed questions on foreign policy and events.i think the issue was a real journalist isnt allowed access to putin for hours, instead they let a propogandist masquerading as a journalist go and do it..
What would the USA do if Mexico decided to allow China to build a military base right next to the border with America and formed an alliance with them and other countries not in NATO?Tell me what threat the "nazis" in Ukraine had on Russia and why Putin needed to destroy the country and destroy everyone's life there, not to even mention the hundreds of thousands of causalities their own armed forces have suffered. Make it make sense.
You know that is not why he is there.. it's just a feeble lie supporters tell themselves to rationalize it.
Nope.did a ukranian take your shelf stacking job?
What would the USA do if Mexico decided to allow China to build a military base right next to the border with America and formed an alliance with them and other countries not in NATO?
They'd probably take military action. Nope, not probably, definitely. No doubt you'll repeat "but we're not talking about the USA", as if we need to apply a different standard to what we think Russia is allowed to do compared to the self righteous scumbags that run America that dictate what hypocrisy it can get away with, and what it's drone population believe.
And just exactly where are you from Kemo Sabe?Russia is good, the west is bad. That's of more importance.
You and the west have evil in your heart.
No one was building military bases in Ukraine. lmao
No one even provided Ukraine military aid until after 2014, and even then it was almost entirely non-lethal military aid.
Ukraine didn't start receiving significant military aid till 2022 when it became clear to western intelligence the invasion was coming.
Putin said if the West stopped arming Ukraine the war would be over in a couple of weeks. Sorry, Putin, it's not going to be that easy...I don't have to ask as I'm positive those Ukrainian soldiers and their families would love peace. But Russia is actively invading and demolishing their cities. If they wanted to give up to the Russian boot they would have done so already.
Russia loving animals support the killing of Ukrainians while the USA gives them a means to defend themselves...that must really bother you to no end
Ukraine was going to join the EU not NATO. Putin wanted them to join his own economic union that would mainly benefit them, similar to their time leading the USSR, but Ukraine's population preferred the EU. That's why we're here.But they would be free to once part of NATO.
And when you say "significant military aid ", what exactly is your idea of significant?
Would 250 million qualify as significant? Or is that chump change in your opinion?
What would a peace deal look like to you? Russia keeps Crimea and returns all other parts of Ukraine?If USA cared for Ukrainians, they would be looking to negotiate a peace deal.
Ukraine was going to join the EU not NATO. Putin wanted them to join his own economic union that would mainly benefit them, similar to their time leading the USSR, but Ukraine's population preferred the EU. That's why we're here.
But they would be free to once part of NATO.
And when you say "significant military aid ", what exactly is your idea of significant?
Would 250 million qualify as significant? Or is that chump change in your opinion?