International Tucker Carlson in Russia to interview Vladimir Putin UPDATE - Also Dugin

You didn't really say much apart from Ukraine is a sovereign country. The rest was just you whining like a baby.
But anyway, I fail to see what point you're trying to make. Are you saying a sovereign country should never be invaded?

Tell me what threat the "nazis" in Ukraine had on Russia and why Putin needed to destroy the country and destroy everyone's life there, not to even mention the hundreds of thousands of causalities their own armed forces have suffered. Make it make sense.

You know that is not why he is there.. it's just a feeble lie supporters tell themselves to rationalize it.
 
Tell me what threat the "nazis" in Ukraine had on Russia and why Putin needed to destroy the country and destroy everyone's life there, not to even mention the hundreds of thousands of causalities their own armed forces have suffered. Make it make sense.

You know that is not why he is there.. it's just a feeble lie supporters tell themselves to rationalize it.
Everyone Russia doesn't like is a Nazi.
 
Just like USA always wants to invade other countries for their own reasons.
I love that people are fine with that happening non stop, but as soon as Russia do it (to a shit hole full of Nazis and corruption who are suddenly painted up as saints), bitches start crying about it. Followed by cries of "but were not talking about the USA!".

And I said "manufactured", not "pretend". The war happened because Ukraine made it happen. Helped on by everyone else.

Nobody ever bought this bullshit but Trumpers traitors and morons.

And we're not talking about the USA slowpoke. Pointing the finger at the usa changes nothing about Russian aggression and the need for the west to understand that Russia is a self declared enemy and is treated as such
 
Western establishment wants only one side of a war getting press time. Regardless of the propaghanda aspect of Putin's interview, what is wrong in giving the other side a chance to air their version of events? Doesn't mean one supports the other side.

I am not seeing it as any different to letting Bin Laden explain why he attacked on 9-11. Doesn't mean one is pro Bin Laden / Al Qaeda.
 
Western establishment wants only one side of a war getting press time. Regardless of the propaghanda aspect of Putin's interview, what is wrong in giving the other side a chance to air their version of events? Doesn't mean one supports the other side.

I am not seeing it as any different to letting Bin Laden explain why he attacked on 9-11. Doesn't mean one is pro Bin Laden / Al Qaeda.
i think the issue was a real journalist isnt allowed access to putin for hours, instead they let a propogandist masquerading as a journalist go and do it..
 
i think the issue was a real journalist isnt allowed access to putin for hours, instead they let a propogandist masquerading as a journalist go and do it..
Obviously Putin doesn't want a critical journalist, but that is kinda true for all leaders. Our Western MSM journalists never truly take our leaders to task, asking them hard pointed questions on foreign policy and events.

Watching the White House press corps over the decades I often wondered why they never truly bring up uncomfortable and serious foreign policy issues, specifically those concerning allies. Now compared to Russia we are obviously orders of magnitude freer to ask critical questions, but our media still supports the establishment line on foreign policy regardless of who is president. This was very evident in the run up to both the Gulf and Iraq wars, along with support for Saudi Arabia.
 
Tell me what threat the "nazis" in Ukraine had on Russia and why Putin needed to destroy the country and destroy everyone's life there, not to even mention the hundreds of thousands of causalities their own armed forces have suffered. Make it make sense.

You know that is not why he is there.. it's just a feeble lie supporters tell themselves to rationalize it.
What would the USA do if Mexico decided to allow China to build a military base right next to the border with America and formed an alliance with them and other countries not in NATO?

They'd probably take military action. Nope, not probably, definitely. No doubt you'll repeat "but we're not talking about the USA", as if we need to apply a different standard to what we think Russia is allowed to do compared to the self righteous scumbags that run America that dictate what hypocrisy it can get away with, and what it's drone population believe.
 
What would the USA do if Mexico decided to allow China to build a military base right next to the border with America and formed an alliance with them and other countries not in NATO?

They'd probably take military action. Nope, not probably, definitely. No doubt you'll repeat "but we're not talking about the USA", as if we need to apply a different standard to what we think Russia is allowed to do compared to the self righteous scumbags that run America that dictate what hypocrisy it can get away with, and what it's drone population believe.

No one was building military bases in Ukraine. lmao

No one even provided Ukraine military aid until after 2014, and even then it was almost entirely non-lethal military aid.

Ukraine didn't start receiving significant military aid till 2022 when it became clear to western intelligence the invasion was coming.
 
No one was building military bases in Ukraine. lmao

No one even provided Ukraine military aid until after 2014, and even then it was almost entirely non-lethal military aid.

Ukraine didn't start receiving significant military aid till 2022 when it became clear to western intelligence the invasion was coming.

But they would be free to once part of NATO.
And when you say "significant military aid ", what exactly is your idea of significant?
Would 250 million qualify as significant? Or is that chump change in your opinion?
 
I don't have to ask as I'm positive those Ukrainian soldiers and their families would love peace. But Russia is actively invading and demolishing their cities. If they wanted to give up to the Russian boot they would have done so already.

Russia loving animals support the killing of Ukrainians while the USA gives them a means to defend themselves...that must really bother you to no end
Putin said if the West stopped arming Ukraine the war would be over in a couple of weeks. Sorry, Putin, it's not going to be that easy... <36>
 
But they would be free to once part of NATO.
And when you say "significant military aid ", what exactly is your idea of significant?
Would 250 million qualify as significant? Or is that chump change in your opinion?
Ukraine was going to join the EU not NATO. Putin wanted them to join his own economic union that would mainly benefit them, similar to their time leading the USSR, but Ukraine's population preferred the EU. That's why we're here.
 
Ukraine was going to join the EU not NATO. Putin wanted them to join his own economic union that would mainly benefit them, similar to their time leading the USSR, but Ukraine's population preferred the EU. That's why we're here.

Ummm, wut?
Pretty sure Ukraine wanted to join both. 🤨
 
But they would be free to once part of NATO.
And when you say "significant military aid ", what exactly is your idea of significant?
Would 250 million qualify as significant? Or is that chump change in your opinion?

Ukraine's NATO membership request was rejected years ago. You don't know what you're talking about. Ukraine joining NATO was never part of the issue.

Ukraine was trying to join the EU and start using the Euro. They weren't trying to join a military alliance.

By significant, I didn't mean in dollar value, I meant in effectiveness. Ukraine didn't start receiving lethal military aid from the US or aligned countries until very recently.

But to your question, $250M is a rounding error when you're talking about an economy the scale of the United States, let alone the United States + all of Europe.
 
Back
Top