International Tucker Carlson in Russia to interview Vladimir Putin UPDATE - Also Dugin

The left/right dialectic is a weapon to make you hate your fellow man. Turn off the social media ffs. Best to be worried about the tunnels/usury, WEF, and the rest of the Fabian blueprint.
 
The ad piece for the interview tells you the story of what's to come. Mr. Carlson is going to be the truthsayer yet the guy can't get through a 3-minute ad for the interview without making his opinion clear. Give me a break. Another shitbag pushing their agenda under the veil of unbiased journalism.
It's quite ironic seeing you rocking that Kool Keith AV who was quite the liberal genius himself breaking artistic layers all over his career.

/edit I'm drunk.
 
The left/right dialectic is a weapon to make you hate your fellow man. Turn off the social media ffs. Best to be worried about the tunnels/usury, WEF, and the rest of the Fabian blueprint.

Sarcasm?

CTard narratives are also designed to make you hate your fellow man.
 
"Left wing grifter" can you elobarete? Tucker has his history and so does Putin. So why are you white knighting?
It's not journalism, it's propaganda for the weak being prone to cheap answers because they can't formulate answers themselves.

And Tucker is doing this only for himself. There's not even a nuance of informational level in this.

You like strong leaders with clear answers to complex problems?
Thanks for the synopsis on something you haven't watched. There's nothing to "white knight" because I haven't watched it either, because it hasn't been released yet. Would you also like to give us a book report on some books you didn't read?


And you know as well as I do that the first thing you're going to do when it is available to watch is run to Sam Seder, Kyle Kulinki, or David Pakman for them to tell you why you're supposed to be outraged.
 
BTW, can @Chad R. Thundercock do a pre-interview bingo card on the garbage talking points we're going to get from this 'journalism'?

That's not a bad idea. I can probably use this list for material:

I bet it has some of the following:

  • russia only wants peace!
  • it is NATO that wants war!
  • anglo-saxons (fkn anglo-saxons)
  • Ukraine fake country
  • donbass children
  • denazification
  • defending traditional values
  • 51 or more genders
  • russian super weapons
  • MASSIVE RUSIAN NUKULAR ARSENL
  • 2russophobic4u
 
That's not a bad idea. I can probably use this list for material:

That's a good solid start.

Add in something about coups that didn't happen, biolabs that don't exist, immense threats to Russian security (kinda covered), NATO massing weapons on every border they can, and how Russia and America can do some great deals and trade...

giphy.gif


I'm already tired of how "misunderstood" the conflict is lol
 
Thanks for the synopsis on something you haven't watched. There's nothing to "white knight" because I haven't watched it either, because it hasn't been released yet. Would you also like to give us a book report on some books you didn't read?


And you know as well as I do that the first thing you're going to do when it is available to watch is run to Sam Seder, Kyle Kulinki, or David Pakman for them to tell you why you're supposed to be outraged.
Uh oh, so you are really trying to spin it this way?!
I don't know any of these people you mentioned.
But now I know that you are one of these searching for cheap answers to complex problems.
<Oku04>
Have a blast "NostraDUMBASS"
 
My comment. A non sequitur and acting surprised doesn't bring any substance to the convo.

What did you write?

"The left/right dialectic is a weapon to make you hate your fellow man. Turn off the social media ffs. Best to be worried about the tunnels/usury, WEF, and the rest of the Fabian blueprint."

Implication, "don't listen to social media and left-right stuff, but DO pay attention to these CTard narratives"

What did I write?

"CTard narratives are also designed to make you hate your fellow man."

Implication, well, I don't understand why I need to explain how that directly follows your statement?

Did you mean to write that, or did you mean to write "best NOT to be worried about..." because your confusion is baffling me. There's nothing complicated or hidden or mysterious in how my post directly follows yours?
 
Thanks for the synopsis on something you haven't watched. There's nothing to "white knight" because I haven't watched it either, because it hasn't been released yet. Would you also like to give us a book report on some books you didn't read?


And you know as well as I do that the first thing you're going to do when it is available to watch is run to Sam Seder, Kyle Kulinki, or David Pakman for them to tell you why you're supposed to be outraged.
And still you haven't said shit or answered my question. I'm based in germany so this is all more like some entertainment to me. Like being a visitor in a mental hospital really.
Just like german "politicians" like Wagenknecht.

Give it a shot, I'm open.
 
You're saying I'm wrong in my assessment that Putin has managed to turn the right wing of American politics against their own allies and interests?

I mean, it's not even subtle or clever, it's manipulation of the mindless.
Yea I am not sure how he has done that; some right-wing people don't like the amount of $ we have given to Ukraine with all the corruption there. I don't think that is so much pro Putin. Of course, you will find nutty people that are full pro Putin just like nutty people in every walk of life. Like people cheering for Hamas and holding multiples protests for that. When was the last Putin/Russia protest in USA that was major in anyway?

There is an assumption that if you don't want to be on full board help Ukraine train that means your pro Russia. There are people in between that acknowledge what Russia is doing is wrong. But it would be interesting to see how you came to this conclusion. If you want to point to Trump, he had some of the toughest sanctions on Russia.

I think we should be helping Ukraine but not as blindly as we have.
 
And still you haven't said shit or answered my question. I'm based in germany so this is all more like some entertainment to me.
Just like german "politicians" like Wagenknecht.

Give it a shot, I'm open.
Open to what? I'm not into guys, but best of luck with your "alternative lifestyle".

Do you think it makes it LESS pathetic to be outraged over an interview you didn't watch, when you don't live in either of the countries involved?
 
I look forward to the softball questions to Putin.
 
Open to what? I'm not into guys, but best of luck with your "alternative lifestyle".
And of course you are falling for the cheapest trick and make it sexual. I wrote that on purpose. Just for the record.
Man, you truly are a stupid specimen.
Thank you!

Have fun gaining informations from whatever crap you are feeding yourself with.

I actually pity you.
 
Back
Top