• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Trump-Ukraine Megathread V7

Do you support the Syria pullout?


  • Total voters
    76
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Ukrainian President on 4 different occasions stated that he was never pressured, though.

I don't know what the hell Mulvaney is smoking when he said that but it must've been some good shit.
Oh yes. Are you talking about the Ukranian President sitting right beside Trump who does not want to get "Kurd'ed' by Trump and abandoned to his fate with Russia, and said exactly what Trump wanted to hear. The guys who was not going to be defiant and go down in flames because he puts honesty over his countries safety.

That Ukrainian president?


Ya, go ahead and answer that question honestly please, says Trump...
usa-trump_whistleblower.1.jpg


C5HubP7XUAE1sp4.jpg


What Mulvaney is doing is getting ahead of the escaping news. The 'no quid pro' line is falling apart and evidence will be released to destroy it. Trump's team always tries to announce whatever is coming out before it comes out and just label it 'good' or 'normal'.



Don't worry. You will be saying 'it was a quid pro quo, but legal, get over it' soon enough.

You can mark those words down too.
 
Might be an "anonymous source familiar with the situation". You've always been comfortable with those, why the change now?

Then show us their (the Washington Examiner, to be clear) source, any source at all. There isn't any, because it's a lie.
 
lol so when the COF says something happened, you deny it and believe in the foreign leader instead?

Mulvaney is about to be fired for this though. One thing you cant do in the Trump Administration is tell the truth!
No I disagree. Trumps path is very clear

- Lie and say you never did and call it fake news
- As facts start to trickle out switch to 'we never did it, but it would be fine if we did'
- as Trump is caught dead to rights with facts about to come out 'ok we did it, and it was legal and perfect to do'

Mulvaney's statement is just getting ahead of the inevitable. It will now be the new line on Fox, 'So what QPQ, they are done all the time, get over it'

All the trumpsters on this forum saying no QPQ the last few weeks will soon switch too.
 
The Ukrainian President on 4 different occasions stated that he was never pressured, though.

I don't know what the hell Mulvaney is smoking when he said that but it must've been some good shit.
It was the same stuff Trump smoked when he wrote that letter to Erdogan. <Moves>
 
WTF? Is it appropriate for Senior Moderators to be taking part in these threads in the way they are? There are at least two of them in here who are clearly biased against Trump. That seems like a conflict of interests to me.... I feel at risk just posting this. :eek:
 
WTF? Is it appropriate for Senior Moderators to be taking part in these threads in the way they are? There are at least two of them in here who are clearly biased against Trump. That seems like a conflict of interests to me.... I feel at risk just posting this. :eek:
Report those bastards... <3>
 
Report those bastards... <3>

They are the voice of authority here and responsible for handing out infractions. Their very presence in the thread stifles free speech. If you wanna be a Mod I think you have to remain neutral. Again. Just my opinion...
 
Par for the course.
Would it be better if they mentioned an anonymous source familiar with the situation?
Sure because then the New Agency or whoever who is communicating with that source gets held to account.

Its like the Whistle blower is an anonymous source. But they are tied to the IG who was the first one vouching for them. He was not just saying there is some unknown anonymous source. He is saying he has communicated with the source who will remain anonymous.

Very different than an article that has no source and the articles author or that publication is not standing behind it.
 
WTF? Is it appropriate for Senior Moderators to be taking part in these threads in the way they are? There are at least two of them in here who are clearly biased against Trump. That seems like a conflict of interests to me.... I feel at risk just posting this. :eek:

You think moderators shouldn't be allowed to post in the War Room, unless they are pro-Trump?

Conflict of interest? Huh?

You feel at risk? OMG you poor little thing, I'm so sorry this isn't a safe space for you. If you don't like someone else's opinion, then debate it with them. That's how adults do it.
 
Mods take part in all kinds of discussions and if you are not straight up trolling they dont infract you

Mod team these days is actually quite good
 
Mulvaney: "I was going to wear my Montreal Expos hat but they said that would be foreign interference in the World Series. So we can't do that either."

LMAO
 
What can I do about it? I'm not President. Trump is the one that left them to die. We used their plight to limit the number of boots we had on the ground, and they fought so well we completed 90% of our objective, but an election nears and we need campaign promise points so you guys are on your own. And this also aligns with Russia's interests if it's as bad as Trump being under their influence.

So what??? We stay there forever??? We have to leave at some point, may as well just get it over with now. The Kurds would be happy to know there’s a karate forum arguing about them though.
 
They are the voice of authority here and responsible for handing out infractions. Their very presence in the thread stifles free speech. If you wanna be a Mod I think you have to remain neutral. Again. Just my opinion...

#fakemods
 
You think moderators shouldn't be allowed to post in the War Room, unless they are pro-Trump?

Conflict of interest? Huh?

You feel at risk? OMG you poor little thing, I'm so sorry this isn't a safe space for you. If you don't like someone else's opinion, then debate it with them. That's how adults do it.
Wow. Did I say that? I said you should remain neutral in Political threads. Attacking me and belittling me for even bringing it up makes my point.

You hold too much power to be allowed to post in Political threads in a biased way, and I think if you can't remain neutral then you should resign your position or be removed from it by the owners of the Site. This is ridiculous.

<Fedor23>
 
Wow. Did I say that? I said you should remain neutral in Political threads. Attacking me and belittling me for even bringing it up makes my point.

You hold too much power to be allowed to post in Political threads in a biased way, and I think if you can't remain neutral then you should resign your position or be removed from it by the owners of the Site. This is ridiculous.

<Fedor23>

Hehehe you see now?
 
Wow. Did I say that? I said you should remain neutral in Political threads. Attacking me and belittling me for even bringing it up makes my point.

You hold too much power to be allowed to post in Political threads in a biased way, and I think if you can't remain neutral then you should resign your position or be removed from it by the owners of the Site. This is ridiculous.

<Fedor23>
This is nonsense. War room posters routinely argue with and directly criticize the mods for their opinions.
 
The White House is so corrupt they’re now admitting it publicly and saying “who cares” about the things they do. “Nothing America can do about it”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top