• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Trump-Ukraine Megathread V7

Do you support the Syria pullout?


  • Total voters
    76
Status
Not open for further replies.
lol so when the COF says something happened, you deny it and believe in the foreign leader instead?

Mulvaney is about to be fired for this though. One thing you cant do in the Trump Administration is tell the truth!

Well it concerns him and his country so...Yes? <LikeReally5>
 
THis is some good advice, you should share this with all the people crying over Lebron not saying anything negative about China and Hong Kong!

Im not familiar with that topic as I don’t really care about the opinions of actors and athletes. I like Lebron as a basketball player, past that, o don’t care about his opinion of other countries.
 
THis is some good advice, you should share this with all the people crying over Lebron not saying anything negative about China and Hong Kong!

Im not familiar with that topic as I don’t really care about the opinions of actors and athletes. I like Lebron as a basketball player, past that, i don’t care about his opinion of other countries.
 
Anyone read Sondland's opening statement? Sure sounds like QPQ to me.

We've already pivoted to quid pro quos happen all the time and they are actually a good thing.

Elections have quid pro quonsequences
 
Everything Trump does is very legal and very cool to his supporters.

funnies1-25c03d7f4188412b.jpg
 
Sooo, no answer to my questions?

What was the source of this "transcript"?

A source for that publication being a legit news source?

Why won't you answer, I wonder? You aren't lying trough your teeth and trolling, are you?

Why are you asking me?

Why can't you go look for one yourself?

The link to the article is there. {<huh}

And no, I'm not trolling. Just 'cause I believe the article does not make me a troll. Jesus christ....
 
To be honest, I don't give a shit either (America First and all that) but just 'cause I don't care doesn't mean I'm not interested in what others think and say.

You can only hang out in one War Room thread too long before you need to find something new to digest and talk about.

I wasn't talking to you, I quoted Bob Acrtor.

I just love that you are so sure that letter is fake! How are you going to deal with reality when it finally sinks in?
 
You're talking to a guy who flatly rejects the Trump letter as fake. He will pick and chose what he believes as long as it fits his narrative.

Gee...that sounds familiar. Hmmm..... *looks at Leftist dimwits here*
 
Last edited:
Why are you asking me?

Why can't you go look for one yourself?

The link to the article is there. {<huh}

And no, I'm not trolling. Just 'cause I believe the article does not make me a troll. Jesus christ....

Calm down.

Did you see a source in that article? Yes or no.
 
I wasn't talking to you, I quoted Bob Acrtor.

I just love that you are so sure that letter is fake! How are you going to deal with reality when it finally sinks in?

And what reality is that, fogie?
 
Who was the source of this "transcript"?

Can you provide any source for that publication being a legit news source?

It's not me saying so, there was no source and that is a tabloid. These are facts, not anyone's opinion.

Maybe you should start discussing facts, instead of trolling it up here.
Might be an "anonymous source familiar with the situation". You've always been comfortable with those, why the change now?
 
So now the Trump administration is admitting Quid Pro Quo.
Looks like they are still using the same playbook. First blame fake news and liberals. Then call everyone a liar. Then finally admit it and tell everyone its no big deal we shit on the US Constitution again.
 
Might be an "anonymous source familiar with the situation". You've always been comfortable with those, why the change now?

There is an actual source, Scorpion. It was a link that highlighted the word "Washington Examiner".

I think fogie's attempt to humiliate me (or at least it seems that way) was unsuccessful. <CerseiPlotting>
 
Last edited:
Sondland's testimony should be interesting. The opening statement pretty much accused Trump of QPQ through Guliani, who he ordered Volker and Sondland to work with in regards to the "deliverable". Which was a statement Trump demanded before he would grant Zelensky a WH visit.
 
WH now admits There was a Quid Pro Quo - says 'Get over it!'



This was my post from the PRIOR thread.

----------

I and others have pointed out many times that this is following the typical path of Trump denial to admittance.

We are now moving into the stage of:

"OK SO THERE WAS A QUID PRO QUO BUT NOT THE ILLEGAL TYPE'


Feel free to mark these words down as all the Trumpbots pivot to this over the next few weeks after Ambassador Sondland testifies stating they were offering a quid pro quo but not the illegal kind. all the guys whose entire defense currently is based on 'NO quid pro quo' will soon be saying 'OK quid pro quo but the illegal kind'. All this despite the fact that no quid pro quo is required for POTUS to break the law. Just the request of foreign interference breaks the law.

Republican talking points...

giphy.gif
 
What’s pathetic??? The fact that I’m not concerned with the same things as you??? That I don’t care about a group of people on the other side of the world that have absolutely no impact on me or my life???

if you care about the Kurds so much, do something to help them, until then, you’re just crying on a karate forum which isn’t helping anything.
What can I do about it? I'm not President. Trump is the one that left them to die. We used their plight to limit the number of boots we had on the ground, and they fought so well we completed 90% of our objective, but an election nears and we need campaign promise points so you guys are on your own. And this also aligns with Russia's interests if it's as bad as Trump being under their influence.
 
Actually, I did.

Here it is :

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...olker-to-say-ukraine-felt-pressure-from-trump

It was linked in the article part where it said :

Fortunately, Volker refused to bow to Schiff’s pressure, the Washington Examiner reported.

The link is where "Washington Examiner" is.


So can you leave me alone now? Thanks. :cool:

I'm talking about the Washington Examiner's source, silly. What is the Washington Examiner's source? There wasn't any cited in their article.

This is where you say something like "I can't be bothered to run around tying to find sources", right?

Either accept the fact that there is no source or other corroborating information, and admit it's fake, or stop making a fool of yourself here.

side note: The letter is fake, you said. Oh man, it's going to be fun watching you try to dodge that one!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top