- Joined
- Feb 11, 2005
- Messages
- 27,343
- Reaction score
- 39,540
Did she ever fight/debate with a cracked skull?Kamala is smarter than Tito....I get that you are a Trump fan but don't delude yourself because you hate a political party.
Did she ever fight/debate with a cracked skull?Kamala is smarter than Tito....I get that you are a Trump fan but don't delude yourself because you hate a political party.
what country are you from? english is certainly not your first languageare you excited for the vegetable-in-chief and his didn't earn it laughing stock taking it to hitler?
she ain't tryna do all that to outlive her kidsDid she ever fight/debate with a cracked skull?
Did you read the part where she criticize him about his segregationist friends tho?She attacked his policy....she did not even say he was racist or compare him to Hitler.
If JD Vance just said that Trump's wall idea was awful then you would have a point.
this is culty behavior. you can support trump as a candidate but that does not delineate into approving into every single thing that he says or does.
Of course it's a joke, she is smarter than Tito. Not a whole lot, but she is.Kamala is smarter than Tito....I get that you are a Trump fan but don't delude yourself because you hate a political party.
yeah, he worked with people that were bad. that is not nearly the same as saying as your colleague is hitler's reincarnation or a bigoted pig blatantly.Did you read the part where she criticize him about his segregationist friends tho?
Vance brings three things to the table:Kamala never dogwhistled that Biden was a racist or compared him Adolf Hitler.
This is a dumb move on the Trump Admin part, they had a lot of other people that have less baggage associated to villifying Trump. Ramaswamy was a better pick for him from the getgo. Even a random ass hail mary like Candace Owens would be a better bet.
It is not too hard to handle Kamala in debates. But they shot themselves in the foot by having a guy with so much anti-trump tags on him. It is too easy to skin him as a grifter.....
ok...........i don't know what that has to do with your culty behavior maybe you were having a twitter convo with a lunatic about somethingelse....you rarely see open support for biden and his rallies are empty. and the democrats' messaging the last 8 years hasn't been "vote for us, we're doing good things!", it's "the other guy is evil, you can't vote for him, and he can't win".
pathetic.
Before the election, you'll be disgustingly slandering people for saying true things critical of Vance.Breitbart users before Vance was confirmed: Trump shouldn't pick him.
Breitbart users when Vance was confirmed: What a great choice!
I would add a bitchy comment, but I don't have to.
I think it’s fair.
I mean, George HW Bush ran against Reagan in the primaries of 1980 and then went on to be Reagan’s VP. In the primaries, Bush famously criticized Reaganomics as “voodoo economics.” It was a big sound bite at the time.
But that’s a far cry from saying “Id never vote for Reagan, he’s a reprehensible idiot and I’m worried he might be Hitler,” you know?
QFTRepublicans, minus the handful of true believers like MTG, probably hate Trump more than Democrats actually do. At least Democrats can talk shit about him publicly. Republicans have to kiss the ring and do all sorts of humiliating acts of obeisance to him.
If you want to know what they really think of him, just got back to 2015-2016 when they were calling him a psychopath, a pathological liar, Hitler, etc. It was only when they realized the inevitable direction the GOP was heading that they became the disingenuous hypocrites they currently are.
Oh, stfu and get a grip. Your post doesn't even make sense, you fucking hack.Before the election, you'll be disgustingly slandering people for saying true things critical of Vance.
The biggest target on Vance's back is going to be dodging the grifter accusations because they are blatant as hell to anyone with a functioning brain. He also has basically called supporters of Trump "trailer trash". So there's that.Vance brings three things to the table:
1. By far the smartest guy and best speaker of his potential choices.
2. Huge connections to tech money. Probably the reason for the Musk endorsement, and it brings Thiel fully on board.
3. Rust Belt ties.
IMO, Trump and others *greatly* overstate the importance of 1 and 2. VP picks don't generally matter much, but I think Vance will hurt more than he helps. How many Americans are going to want a potential president who wants people imprisoned for writing newspaper columns critical of Trump?





Tito?Btw i'd put Tito on a debate with Kamala in a heartbeat. Even Tito could be able to beat her.

ok...........i don't know what that has to do with your culty behavior maybe you were having a twitter convo with a lunatic about somethingelse....