Elections Trump Indicted On 91 Counts

Just know all, I shared a bottle of Camus and then some high end bourbon tonight. That went with some Baby Back ribs, gourmet Mac&Cheese (white cheeses.. 3 different kind), and asparagus with great family. Look out how well I type as I watch UFC fights lit up with great achohol.

Just glued to my phone making post after post in the Trump indictment thread while spending a lovely Saturday night with my beautiful family, as one typically does
 
You're blissfully in living in the Democratic Party matrix.

Do you know who Comey, Stzrok, Page, Mcabe, Clinesmith, Chang, etc. are? If you don't then you're ignorant. If you do , you're an asshole. Party means nothing with the Establishment bureaucrat glass. For you not to know that is embarrassing, especially with you posting in a political forum.

You're a comical collection of cultist nonsense consisting mostly of Proud Boy/Patriot Front/Oathkeeper buzz words. Matrix, lol, it's so funny to see you chuds make references to a movie written by two trannies about being a tranny. Party means nothing, and yet it's all you endlessly yap about. Republicand did absolutely nothing, because they had nothing to do. They're still doing nothing.

And this isnt a political forum, it's an MMA forum with a political sub-forum. At least learn where the f*ck you are.
 
There's no distraction, but you are asking why I am afraid to discuss other topics in the thread about Trump being indicted?

I gave you a shot. You're weak. Never turn down a drunk man being honest. You have little wisdom.
 
clintons corrupt to the bone

Yes. Every thoughtful person knows it. But, we must accept that Bill Clinton was an effective president. He did the job well for the most part. He did sell out some military technology to the Chinese like submarine and missal guidance technologies. I'll bet most people forgot. Still, comparing him to his peers he's a B. I'm not a fan of his ideology, but he kept the nation safe and in line. I doubt think Biden has us safe.
 
Yes. Every thoughtful person knows it. But, we must accept that Bill Clinton was an effective president. He did the job well for the most part. He did sell out some military technology to the Chinese like submarine and missal guidance technologies. I'll bet most people forgot. Still, comparing him to his peers he's a B. I'm not a fan of his ideology, but he kept the nation safe and in line. I doubt think Biden has us safe.


They should be in prison for money laundering
 
And yet you are taking time away from "great family" to argue on the internet and minimize crimes committed by your hero.

Family just left. I thought you would drop the weak snark persona and actually discuss something. I'm in the mood to dive into the weeds on a topic. You're surface level. I get it.... do you're thing and have a great night.
 
Family just left. I thought you would drop the weak snark persona and actually discuss something. I'm in the mood to dive into the weeds on a topic. You're surface level. I get it.... do you're thing and have a great night.
Your entire point is you want to discuss imaginary crimes that others committed in a thread about Trump's crimes which he is on tape admitting to. But you say you aren't distracting from the topic. Do you think Trump is guilty of any of the crimes he is charged with in this specific case?
 
You're a comical collection of cultist nonsense consisting mostly of Proud Boy/Patriot Front/Oathkeeper buzz words. Matrix, lol, it's so funny to see you chuds make references to a movie written by two trannies about being a tranny. Party means nothing, and yet it's all you endlessly yap about. Republicand did absolutely nothing, because they had nothing to do. They're still doing nothing.

And this isnt a political forum, it's an MMA forum with a political sub-forum. At least learn where the f*ck you are.

The Republican Party sucks. So, you're wrong about me there. I'm a Conservatarian (Conservative / Libertarian). All your weak interpretation, that is way off base, just speaks to you being Left Cult with little critical thinking skills. Trump is a dick. But, you don't get to have two standards of Justice and expect everyone to accept it. We are all not drones like you. Imprison Trump, Hillary, and Biden... or don't. Just be consistent. Your desire to not be consistent makes you a coward. You believe the ends justify the means. That's a bitch move.
 
Play in a freeway. You offer nothing. When you decide you want to actually provide some substance, then maybe people will take you seriously.
You refuse to answer my question about your opinion on Trump committing the crimes he is charged with (the actual topic of this thread), but you say I have nothing to offer. The only substance you provide is a pathetic attempt to deflect from the actual discussion and a grade school "go kill yourself" quip. I know you aren't capable of much, but this is still a piss poor attempt.
 
https://www.judicialwatch.org/judic...drawer-audio-tape-case-exonerates-pres-trump/
Judicial Watch: Clinton Sock Drawer Audio Tape Case Exonerates Pres. Trump

A decade old legal case that could exonerate former President Donald Trump has been buried by legacy media.

“[Special counsel] Jack Smith is terrified of the only standing legal case decision from a court concerning the Presidential Records Act,” said Chris Farrell, Director of Investigations at Judicial Watch.

The case Farrell is referring to is titled Judicial Watch v. National Archives and Records Administration – also known as the “Clinton sock drawer” case. Former President Bill Clinton created White House audio tapes with historian Taylor Branch and stored them in his sock drawer. Judicial Watch sued to obtain access to the tapes and lost.

“He took them from the White House with him into private life,” said Farrell. “There’s classified material on those tapes and arguably it’s the sort of running stream of consciousness record of Bill Clinton’s presidency. Pretty important stuff.”

Special counsel Jack Smith is currently investigating the 45th president for his handling of classified documents since departing the White House. But Farrell says the ruling in this specific case from 2012 exonerates Trump from any alleged wrongdoing.

“Amy Berman Jackson, the judge presiding on that case, said a couple of very important things,” said Farrell. “That the president had an absolute, unreviewable right to take any records or documents that he wants when he leaves office. “

“No one can come back and second guess or double think or ask questions about what the president elects to take with him,” Farrell continued.

In her ruling, Jackson wrote that “the President enjoys unconstrained authority to make decisions regarding the disposal of documents: ‘[a]lthough the President must notify the Archivist before disposing of records . . . neither the Archivist nor Congress has the authority to veto the President’s disposal decision.’”

Farrell points out that this ruling has existed without challenge or question for ten years.

Read more here

RELATED
 
https://www.judicialwatch.org/judic...drawer-audio-tape-case-exonerates-pres-trump/
Judicial Watch: Clinton Sock Drawer Audio Tape Case Exonerates Pres. Trump

A decade old legal case that could exonerate former President Donald Trump has been buried by legacy media.

“[Special counsel] Jack Smith is terrified of the only standing legal case decision from a court concerning the Presidential Records Act,” said Chris Farrell, Director of Investigations at Judicial Watch.

The case Farrell is referring to is titled Judicial Watch v. National Archives and Records Administration – also known as the “Clinton sock drawer” case. Former President Bill Clinton created White House audio tapes with historian Taylor Branch and stored them in his sock drawer. Judicial Watch sued to obtain access to the tapes and lost.

“He took them from the White House with him into private life,” said Farrell. “There’s classified material on those tapes and arguably it’s the sort of running stream of consciousness record of Bill Clinton’s presidency. Pretty important stuff.”

Special counsel Jack Smith is currently investigating the 45th president for his handling of classified documents since departing the White House. But Farrell says the ruling in this specific case from 2012 exonerates Trump from any alleged wrongdoing.

“Amy Berman Jackson, the judge presiding on that case, said a couple of very important things,” said Farrell. “That the president had an absolute, unreviewable right to take any records or documents that he wants when he leaves office. “

“No one can come back and second guess or double think or ask questions about what the president elects to take with him,” Farrell continued.

In her ruling, Jackson wrote that “the President enjoys unconstrained authority to make decisions regarding the disposal of documents: ‘[a]lthough the President must notify the Archivist before disposing of records . . . neither the Archivist nor Congress has the authority to veto the President’s disposal decision.’”

Farrell points out that this ruling has existed without challenge or question for ten years.

Read more here

RELATED

What a shocking opinion from them.

Judicial Watch (JW) is an American conservative activist group that files Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits to investigate claimed misconduct by government officials. Founded in 1994, JW has primarily targeted Democrats, in particular Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, and the administration of Barack Obama. It was founded by attorney Larry Klayman, and has been led by Tom Fitton since 2003.
Larry Elliot Klayman is an American attorney, right-wing activist, and former U.S. Justice Department prosecutor. He founded both Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch.

Thomas J. Fitton is an American conservative activist and the president of Judicial Watch. Fitton has long been a senior member of the clandestine far right umbrella organisation the Council for National Policy. Fitton is the current CNP President. Fitton is known for pro-Trump commentary.
The Council for National Policy (CNP) is an umbrella organization and networking group for conservative and Republican activists in the United States. It was launched in 1981 during the Reagan administration by Tim LaHaye and the Christian right, to "bring more focus and force to conservative advocacy". The membership list for September 2020 was later leaked, showing that members included prominent Republicans and conservatives, wealthy entrepreneurs, and media proprietors, together with anti-abortion and anti-Islamic extremists. Members are instructed not to reveal their membership or even name the group.

The CNP has been described by The New York Times as "a little-known club of a few hundred of the most powerful conservatives in the country", who meet three times yearly behind closed doors at undisclosed locations for a confidential conference. The Nation has called it a secretive organization that "networks wealthy right-wing donors together with top conservative operatives to plan long-term movement strategy". The organization has been described by Anne Nelson as a "pluto-theocracy" (plutocracy/theocracy).
 
No one is going to prosecute a simple possession case based off of a social media post. Same with prostitutes, etc. The statute of limitations has run, and that evidence is too weak to build a case off of.

The bottom line, Hunter, Hillary, Bill, whomever else you need as a distraction; have much less evidence to build a case off of that what we see here with Trump. Notice how none of you chaps actually try to defend trump here? I think even the most diehard know he's fucked.

That's the reason one is getting indicted and the others aren't. There is evidence for one, and not for the other. If you say otherwise, spell something out. Don't just say vague stuff like "arrest hunter and squeeze him." Do you understand how the criminal justice system works at all?
 
Back
Top