• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Elections Trump Indicted On 91 Counts

poor druncle rudy. he has now reached the Find Out stage of his life.

at least ruby freeman and shaye moss get to come in for their piece of the pie before Dominion absolutely washes their hands of him and cleans him out. plus he's got that georgia criminal indictment looming over him and he's an unnamed co-conspirator who will surely get indicted alongside his other pals over jack smith's january 6'th federal case after jack smith gets done having his way with trump first. plus even his own lawyers are sueing him for not paying them.

things aren't really going all that well for rudy these days. i guess that's what you get when you sell your soul to a loser. poor guy has gotta be sweating bullets right now. he's gonna be whoring himself to the maga trash over on cameo and onlyfans any day now i'll bet.
 
Last edited:
redefine the length of a day and tear up the constitution.
Lols, the length of day…

But I could totally see him create a new month in honor of himself like Caesar..

We would now have Trumptember, right in between June and July. Perfect for golf season…
 
Drunk Rudy really has a full plate.

He has this current defamation suit, which will likely clean him out.

But he's also facing:

1. $2 million suit from that guy he falsely claimed assaulted him
2. $1.3 million suit from former attorneys he never paid
3. Sued by Hunter for the laptop stuff
4. Sued by Smartmatic for defamation
5. Sued by Dominion for defamation
6. Criminal charges in Georgia

I forget the $ involved with Smartmatic and Dominion. I'm sure it's a pretty penny though.

LOL
 

WASHINGTON — Special counsel Jack Smith on Monday asked the Supreme Court to immediately step in to decide whether former President Donald Trump has immunity from prosecution for his actions seeking to overturn the 2020 election.

"This case presents a fundamental question at the heart of our democracy: whether a former President is absolutely immune from federal prosecution for crimes committed while in office," Smith wrote in the court filing.

Smith said it was "of imperative public importance" that the high court decide the question so that Trump's trial, currently scheduled for March, can move forward as quickly as possible...

On Dec. 7, U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is presiding over the election interference case, denied Trump's motion to dismiss his indictment on presidential immunity and constitutional grounds, prompting Trump to appeal and ask for the case to be put on hold.

In order to prevent a delay, Smith is seeking to circumvent the appeals process by asking the Supreme Court to take up the case and decide the issue on an expedited basis.

Smith asked the court to order Trump to respond by Dec. 18 and then immediately act on his request. Under the timeline proposed by Smith, the court — if it decides to step in — could hear arguments and issue a ruling in a matter of weeks.
 
The bank would never admit that it knew the figures were BS as that opens them up to Professional negligence and accusations they did not dispense with their due diligence

so if trump is a fraudster, which you say he is, how soon can we expect an investigation into the bank?
 
Back
Top