Trump Dump / War Train vol 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 429137
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It's unbelievable that the Republican party is so lacking in leadership that someone like Trump got the nomination.


It's even more unbelievable that he has a legit chance at the presidency purely based on people finding his trolling appealing, and Hillary being THAT unpalatable.


This is the worst group of candidates I've ever seen in a presidential election.


The right to choose between a douche and a turd indeed.
 
It's even more unbelievable that he has a legit chance at the presidency purely based on people finding his trolling appealing, and Hillary being THAT unpalatable.

Anyone who wins a major party nomination has a legit chance. Doesn't matter who the other candidate is.
 
I said he might take a 3rd term.

But Obama has been so bad and so ridiculous in 2016 we'll be kicking his rear out ourselves.

lol Obama would win this election if he could run. There were some polls a month or two ago that suggested he would be a pretty unifying candidate, which is incredibly ironic
 
You're talking about someone who once failed to follow best practices for email-server management. Surely God wouldn't hate his chosen nation enough to put that kind of a monster in such an important job.

Gods a funny dude. He put Hitler in charge of Germany and look what happened to the chosen people.
 
Anyone who wins a major party nomination has a legit chance. Doesn't matter who the other candidate is.
Well sure. Was commenting more on the fact that trump seems to have got the nomination purely based on how awful the field of republicans were.


Now a lot of the support he's getting is purely based on how much a lot of people on both sides hate Hillary.


This might be the first time pure voter apathy is strong enough to propel a candidate all the way to the white house.
 
Now a lot of the support he's getting is purely based on how much a lot of people on both sides hate Hillary.

Yeah, I'm just saying that that's not true. Any nominee has a chance, and half the population or so is going to hate the other party's candidate, no matter who it is.

Gods a funny dude. He put Hitler in charge of Germany and look what happened to the chosen people.

I mean, Hitler was kiiinda bad, but Clinton changed her mind about SSM and had a private email server. Much worse.
 
Can everyone just write in
Neil deGrasse Tyson
 
Still better than the alternative

hillarystupid_zpsjsu8dr1r.jpg


hillaryoppressionofwomenfinewithme_zpsoy3qrvox.jpg
 
yea, and I'll also remember you said that "Obama will get a 3rd term after enacting emergency powers..."

Not a third term, but Obama seizing power during a time of martial law is now all that far fetched. If people are freaking out over trump now, imagine if he won the presidency?
 
I mean, Hitler was kiiinda bad, but Clinton changed her mind about SSM and had a private email server. Much worse.

Oh, is that all she did to make herself seem like an evil piece of shit?, hmmm...

Mocked a child rape victim
Benghazi
Her "Charity" keeping 80% of the money for "administration purposes"
Lying about being under fire by snipers in Bosnia

She is practically a pantomine villain at this point..the only people who can't see how demented and evil she is, are the people who will support her no matter what, KNOWING that she is a turd
 
Fuck it - not even sure saving 5 figures in taxes could get me to vote for him - and you have to be really subpar of a candidate for me to say that.

Thankfully, I'm not a us citizen that has to face this kind of absurd choices -- but Hillary will be better for corporate Canada (especially our nuclear and military technology / resources)

Any of you american sherbros on either side that want to crash on my couch for a while after November -- I'd understand
 
He's a great communicator of science and a super likable guy but he would be an awful politician.
Maybe I think a big part of the problem is politicians. We need smart brilliant people who don't live for governance or re-elections
 
Oh, is that all she did to make herself seem like an evil piece of shit?, hmmm...

Mocked a child rape victim
Benghazi
Her "Charity" keeping 80% of the money for "administration purposes"
Lying about being under fire by snipers in Bosnia

So three out of your four examples are objectively false claims (well, you don't say anything about Benghazi--it exists, but the CTs around it are false). The other one is weird, but not something that matters, and could just be a faulty memory (why the fuck would someone lie about that? I don't know).
 
Maybe I think a big part of the problem is politicians. We need smart brilliant people who don't live for governance or re-elections
I agree and think we could benefit greatly from scientists helping make decisions. But they would be terrible at campaigning, raising money, etc.. Good political leaders surround themselves with good advisers, which include scientists.

Tyson was on Sam Harris's podcast and literally refused to take a position on any political matter. It just wouldn't work. Plus, scientists like doing science and would likely be miserable in politics. There's a good reason the majority of politicians are attorneys by training.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top