- Joined
- Jun 12, 2012
- Messages
- 11,122
- Reaction score
- 1
Liberals acting like they are on a high horse looking down. What a surprise. Yet who is their enlightened candidate? The big banks, big corporations, big governments choice.
Here's a link to www.dictionary.com so you can look up demagogue
There's really no reason to believe he's competent on the subject.
Clippy, please stop making threads. Both here and the Heavies.
Gotten to
It's a whole lot of nothing because there is no reason to believe it happened. The person that supposedly said those things (trumps son) has already said it wasn't true. It's a non story. I guess we can just make up lies about people and demonize them. Goodluck with those dubs, you're gonna need it with the way you're postingYou gotta be two tons of fuckwit to think it's a nothing story. Of course, I'm not calling you a fuckwit because that would be flaming and against the forum rules. I only mean to say a person that has the thought you yourself just thought must be a giant bumbling moron too dumb to wipe his own ass.
LOL, my friends are who blind followers to his cult of personality always talk about how great he is at "delegation".
Sure hope so, because the preening lazyass is trying to delegate the entirety of Presidential duties.
Baby ghosts are real. John Edwards channeled one in open court and no way would a future US Senator, presidential candidate and VP nominee lie. Nope.
I don't disagree with the quote but Hawking should have been more critical of Islam because Trump pales into insignificance compared to Islam.
Considering the problems emanating from Islam and part of the reason Trump gets shit on is because of his stance on Muslim immigration, he (Hawking) really should have followed up his comments on Trump with comments on Islam. But like everyone else with any sort of public persona, he is too dam scared of being called Islamophobic or being killed.
Should I listen to the man whose field is almost entirely speculative, whose "truths" are derived mostly through esoteric formulae and impossible to falsify (thus unscientific), or should I listen to the man whose field deals with the most complex and fascinating organ in the human body, a field whose life and death triumphs and failures can be seen right in front of us? A man with his head in the clouds or a real life superhero? Tough choice.
Not really. When it comes to the political endorsements or admonitions from celebrity scientists:
Ben Carson > Hawking
hawking ain't hiding his wheelchair like FDR.Why hasnt hawking ran for office?
I don't think Hawking is a sherdog member.Here's a link to www.dictionary.com so you can look up demagogue
This is you being funny again, right????
Yes. It's the New York Times. They take this stuff seriously. That's why Jayson Blair went down so hard.So you believe this gossip story too?
So says Trump-- the guy with the most spotless track record for honsety, amirite?LOL
Yeah, the New York Times just made the story up.
https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=trump+offer+to+kasich&start=0
Yes. It's the New York Times. They take this stuff seriously. That's why Jayson Blair went down so hard.
So says Trump-- the guy with the most spotless track record for honsety, amirite?
It's a whole lot of nothing because there is no reason to believe it happened. The person that supposedly said those things (trumps son) has already said it wasn't true. It's a non story. I guess we can just make up lies about people and demonize them. Goodluck with those dubs, you're gonna need it with the way you're posting
"Hearsay" is a court term. This isn't court. This is a newspaper report.The story is only as good as the person that broke it. Kasich was the one that claimed trump Jr said this. Trump Jr denies it. It's all hearsay from what I understand. Was this supposed offer documented in any way?