Top 3 MMA Heavyweights of all time: 1. Fedor 2. DC 3. Miocic

I’m talking about resumes. During Fedor’s career, he beat more top ten Heavyweights than anybody else. He beat the best out there- it’s not up for debate:

https://forums.sherdog.com/threads/...st-top-10-ranked-wins-at-heavyweight.4148848/

No one cares about your link, it is irrelevant.

Statistics without the proper context are often irrelevant.

Fedor lost by KO in the first round against a completely washed out old MW, that's all what we need to know about his real level.
 
Igor
Colemang
Randlemang (RIP)
 
Anyone who ranks a fighter who loses a trilogy above the fighter who won the trilogy cannot be taken seriously.


Hughes would need 2 fights to surpass Hallman

People are incredulous when I rate Frankie above BJ at LW
 
This is my list for top 3 MMA Heavyweights of all time:

1. Fedor (obviously)
2. DC
3. Miocic

Do you agree? If not, why? And what is your list?

Opinions?

Discuss.


I’d put Cain in the conversation, and I actually agree with the DC take, DC wasn’t in his prime I think at their peak DC handles him with ease, but he did lose twice so it’s hard to get people on board with that idea but I do agree
 
yes you are.
still living in a fantasy world right? cant believe fedors resume looks lik trash if u compare it to stipe?
fedor wont survive the guys stipe fought.
 
Solid contender for shertard of the year
how come? u believe fedor can win against guys stipe fought?
the version of these guys would pulverize fedor
u cant even post their best wins
 
You are comparing two different eras of mma fighters and showcasing your bias with every post you make. The way Fedor trained and fought in the late 90s to early 00s would of course not be as proficient against fighters training with todays methods. I’m not debating that.

Anyone can say “Mark Coleman would never have been UFC HW or PRIDE OW champion if Stipe was in the tournament,” or “Chuck would have never won the UFC LHW title if he fought in the Jon Jones era.”

I’m talking about resumes. During Fedor’s career, he beat more top ten Heavyweights than anybody else. He beat the best out there- it’s not up for debate:

https://forums.sherdog.com/threads/...st-top-10-ranked-wins-at-heavyweight.4148848/

Finally, you keep saying half his fights were against masked fighters. Please list the 20+ masked fighters that he fought in MMA.
yes so u acknowledge that stipe fought the better fighters and stipe has better wins right?
stipes resume > fedor
thank u for acknowledging
 
Fedor? LOL
O titles outside free doping countries and he was defeated by an old mw Hendo.
theres no way even an old 40 yr old stipe would lose to baldonado and hendo
its sad these fedor hugggers are living in their fantasy world lol
 
yes so u acknowledge that stipe fought the better fighters and stipe has better wins right?
stipes resume > fedor
thank u for acknowledging

no I do not acknowledge that. I believe that comparing different eras is an inaccurate assessment tool. Who would win in a boxing match between Rocky Marciano and Tyson Fury? Different eras, different training, science, and cultures.

Stipe has a great resume but it is not better than Fedor’s, in my opinion.

You also avoided answering my question because you don’t know how to debate people.
 
how come? u believe fedor can win against guys stipe fought?
the version of these guys would pulverize fedor
u cant even post their best wins
Fedor fought much younger, faster and more explosive versions of Arlovski and Hunt than Stipe did.

Stipe fought them when they were very old.
 
Back
Top