In the OP I was very general in asking about throwing uke overhead. Later I did specify marote but my intent was always on the effectiveness of throwing uke overhead.
Wait, what. I just reread your OP and now I'm confused. You actually don't say anything about throwing people over your head and instead talk about throwing people really hard and softly, and yet I refer to head multiple times in my post. Did I make a mistake and misread?
If so, why you talking about throwing people overhead in the post I just quoted now?
Obviously certain throws are designed to have uke go over your head. Tomoe-nage is an obvious example.
Are they effective? What do you mean by effective?
I could get thrown with a tomoe-nage all day and be fine. Throw me a couple times with an uchimata or harai-goshi and I'd probably be incapable of walking for a while.
You wanted a source for where I was getting this info about overhead throws and prewar judo so I posted that link about kata garuma because it was popukar in the old days. That is a throw that has fallen out of style.
No. I wanted info about how you think prewar judo is any different from Olympic judo or w.e.
I already wrote that the throws that are used may differ depending on the situation, but the standard for the form will remain the same. My entire disagreement with you here spawns on two things-
1) There exists a pre-war style of judo that somehow differs from Olympic judo.
2) That throwing uke overhead with a seoinage is "fine".
But it appears that #2 was an invalid disagreement.
I dunno why you keep mentioning Kano but dont actually post a video of him or a quote on how to throw.
Seriously?
I wrote that I mentioned his name merely because he invented judo and created certain standards for each throw, and you still don't get why I mentioned his name?
I guess you dont know how to link youtube videos; or are too young to understand that you need to cite facts and sources if you want to convince people what you say is true. You seem like a kid.
Anyway did you look at the links I posted, cause you didn't mention either
I expected you to be capable of looking things up on your own. I apologize for thinking that you were capable of certain things. I will not do that anymore.
There is little point looking at an amazon page of a book, cause I can't read it.
I don't know what the point of the article from the fightland website is in relation to the point you want to make here. Mind explaining?