You keep speaking about this as though it's a petty and insignificant thing. What is the basis for that opinion?
It's almost as if sometimes our personal freedoms are violated for the better of society.
Obviously trying to mind control those that have a weakness for the boobs. :icon_chee
Well, I doubt this would come up as a problem in any less developed country. You don't have the energy to spend on things like this when you're struggling to get good job which will allow you to live a decent life. It's insignificant compared to problems most of the world faces on daily basis.
Sometimes I want to dry my sweaty nuts off in the sun, but I can't just whip 'em out either. Such an injustice! God help me if I don't realise that I'm in the vacinity of an Elementary school too. Double injustice. To hell with your kids and their sensibilities, my nuts are sweaty.
Failed comparison; women aren't fighting to expose their vaginas.
-why compare women's chest and nipples to a nutsack when you can compare it to something both sexes actual possess, like say chests and nipples?
Uhhh... yeah, true? There are some problems you're less concerned with when you aren't able to eat. If we hadn't met a certain level of quality of life none of us would be on Sherdog talking about our political opinions either. Is that really what you're asking here? Are these women able to meet their hierarchy of basic needs? If so, I would say the answer is obviously yes. I still don't see why that's relevant to anything though.
-why compare women's chest and nipples to a nutsack when you can compare it to something both sexes actual possess, like say chests and nipples?
-if kids are allowed to put a tit in there mouth for food what's the big deal if they see some?
Nice try, but men do not possess female breasts.
Nice try, but men do not possess female breasts. Post all the fat asses you want, and it still won't make it true.
Infants put tits in their mouth. If you're breast feeding your six year-old, most of society thinks you're fucked up.
Are male breasts and female breasts really the same though?
“Even though men’s interest in breasts may increase where women are clothed, the interpretation that men in nude cultures do not find breasts erotic is erroneous. Based on numerous interviews I conducted with the Hadza [ethnic group located in north-central Tanzania around the central Rift Valley], men find breasts erotic, even though women usually do not cover their breasts. They fondle breasts during intercourse […]Such fondling is reported in numerous other nude cultures (Ford and Beach 1951). The contention that eroticism only occurs where breasts are covered would imply that men do not find vaginas erotic in completely nude cultures, and that there are no sexual signals among other species.” – Frank Marlow
When a sexual partner touches, massages or nibbles a woman's breasts, Young said, this triggers the release of oxytocin in the woman's brain, just like what happens when a baby nurses. But in this context, the oxytocin focuses the woman's attention on her sexual partner, strengthening her desire to bond with this person.
In other words, men can make themselves more desirable by stimulating a woman's breasts during foreplay and sex. Evolution has, in a sense, made men want to do this.
First thing that comes on google
http://www.iamnotthebabysitter.com/what-is-the-difference-between-female-and-male-breasts/
I'm saying life must be pretty amazing in USA if things like this come up as a problem. It's just interesting to me.
I really have no idea what you're talking about. Do you live in some third world country where you struggle to find food to eat or clean water to drink? Things aren't "amazing" here, but we still care about stuff. Are you saying we shouldn't care about anything until things are "amazing in USA"? I'm genuinely perplexed by your whole entire song and dance here.
In comparison to the rest of the world? Really?
Huh?
Living is USA isn't amazing, in comparison to pretty much 95% of the world?