- Joined
- May 25, 2002
- Messages
- 8,150
- Reaction score
- 9,865
What?????? Now I would really like to know your boxing history or were you have your infos from. There is not one "BOXING". Different styles have different advantages but in general boxing has a heavy history with wrestling. "Clinching" is part of boxing. Until the 40s at least wrestling often was an essential part of boxing training. Boxing was very effective at close range because of that. And everything was "pressure tested". Hand trapping...etc are boxing skills.
Someone like Jack Dempsey really was a killer in every aspect of hand to hand fighting because of that.
Even today quite some boxing coaches incorporate heavy clinch fighting especially if its at pro level. This is very effective and they will shut your offense down completely if you dont know how to counter.
Dont talk down on something you have no knowledge about.
I'm actually a big fan of Dempsey, and good WC can resemble some of these old timers with their in-fighting approach.
But let's not pretend in any way that's representative of what modern boxing is or became. Your referencing the 1920's and 40's.
What I see is boxers having to heavily modify thier art and combine with other things to make it work in MMA.
But what surprised me is seeimg a world champ Malinaggi get busted up and look lost on the inside against an MMA journeyman in a straight fist fight. If that's not a damning indictment of what modern boxing became as regards close range fighting then what is? And we have seen similar in other BK fights many former pro boxers struggle on the inside against low tier strikers.
So boxers who criticizing Wing Chun should know they stand on shakier ground than they think. As I mentioned, we finally have real fight training in WC and the results are very encouraging . Let's see how the Wing Chun vs boxing and other striking arts plays out in MMA in the years ahead as we start to get a bit onto a more even playing field with regards live training.