- Joined
- Mar 10, 2016
- Messages
- 35,486
- Reaction score
- 25,077
So what are your thoughts on Barr misrepresenting?I made a similar claim: that Mueller would "speak out" if he felt Barr's letter misrepresented his report. It seems I was right!
So what are your thoughts on Barr misrepresenting?I made a similar claim: that Mueller would "speak out" if he felt Barr's letter misrepresented his report. It seems I was right!
You were caught being an asshole and changed your post. We can all see it. Hopefully you're gone.Here's what I mean :
![]()
Idk man, I'm saying a ton of lawyers say the opposite. That DA's do review the evidence.
JESUS dude.
There is 400+ pages of evidence, here say and rumor in this thing. He can not pick and choose what to check.
Fuck man, you are asking him to go re check the whole dossier bullshit.
He has to take the document as a professional piece done by the man hired to actually conduct the investigation
What if he checked the evidence and found it faulty or untrue. Then you'd say he's actually obstructing himself.
Nothing will satisfy you
I'm saying that maybe...
Just maybe...
He could've done his due diligence. You know that thing that his oath of office alluded to.
Barr can check whatever he wants to.
No I'm not. I think he should have checked the evidence for obstruction since it was his decision to proceed or not.
And admitted that he was surprised Mueller didn't make a definite conclusion and admitted parts were strange to him.
Huh? If that was the case I'd argue the investigation was bad.
Lazy bullshit claim not based on anything.
They review them for an overall standpoint. They don’t actually start pulling evidence items out of evidence and analyze it all themselves.
Jesus. Now people are pissed Barr accepted the report at face value



No. You wanted him to recheck the report
And if he had done that you'd want him shot in public
So you'd be cool with him speaking to witnesses and Trump himself to check the evidence of the report? Trump answered questions....so barr would need to clarify his answers
Barr said he did not review it though and just accepted Mueller's characterization of the evidence.They review them for an overall standpoint. They don’t actually start pulling evidence items out of evidence and analyze it all themselves.
Jesus. Now people are pissed Barr accepted the report at face value
Holy shit you are slow. He should review the transcripts of the interviews not attempt to recreate the evidence.So you'd be cool with Barr re interviewing all the subjects in part 2 before releasing the report?
I'm not really paying attention at this point. The full Mueller report is out, and I'd rather focus on the alleged conspiracy/obstruction of justice than the politics/optics.So what are your thoughts on Barr misrepresenting?
They were mostly white or Israelite.What about the folks who were enslaved or eradicated by the Nazis?
Barr said he did not review it though and just accepted Mueller's characterization of the evidence.
Holy shit you are slow. He should review the transcripts of the interviews not attempt to recreate the evidence.
This game you're playing is fucking insane. Is it ok to imply folks with Polish ancestry are stupid? If not just cut it out.They were mostly white or Israelite.
Then why did Barr say he did not review it? I think you're having a disconnect.That is reviewing it. Every DA I’ve ever worked with has accepted my characterization of the evidence when deciding to file or not. He reviewed the facts outlined by his investigator in the investigators report and made his yay or nay decision
Then why did Barr say he did not review it? I think you're having a disconnect.