THE REPORT, buttoned up (SCO Thread v. 33)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cake4Breakfast said:
Honestly, that is all beside the point unless Barr is claiming that he would actually indict a sitting POTUS if the evidence were there to support it.
Click to expand...
I agree, but I would find it significant if we found out Barr did not perform his due diligence. It's a stronger case to impeach him, which I think is warranted.
 
Bloody Pulp said:
Barr said he didn’t read Mueller’s report? News to me.
Click to expand...
He said he didn't review the evidence that he accepted Mueller's characterization of the evidence.

I don't see how accepting your word for it equates to reviewing the evidence.
 
I have a strong feeling each of the republicans has their own golden showers pee tape compromat and the same puppet master.
 
kpt018 said:
He said he didn't review the evidence that he accepted Mueller's characterization of the evidence.

I don't see how accepting your word for it equates to reviewing the evidence.
Click to expand...

He’s accepting Mueller’s presentation of the evidence. Just like every DA ever, has accepted mine. They don’t say OK and then go reinvestigate all of the evidence to make sure their investigator got it right.
 
Lindsey was so self-righteous about presidential conduct and cleansing the presidency. What happened?


 
I think i speak for both sides when i say that all these hearings have been embarrassing, reminds me of children arguing over toys.
 
kpt018 said:
This game you're playing is fucking insane. Is it ok to imply folks with Polish ancestry are stupid? If not just cut it out.
Click to expand...

I didn't say it was ok, I said it's not racist. Is it ok to call people racists when they aren't being racists?

Are you implying that @PolishHeadlock2 is stupid, so that makes all polish people stupid?

JK - I get it, but just admit you misused the term "racist" and stop demanding that I agree with you. The overuse of "racist" is REALLY fucking worn out.
 
tehJameson said:
I think i speak for both sides when i say that all these hearings have been embarrassing, reminds me of children arguing over toys.
Click to expand...
Unless Mueller steps up and stops the bs its all so stupid.
 
Bloody Pulp said:
He’s accepting Mueller’s presentation of the evidence. Just like every DA ever, has accepted mine. They don’t say OK and then go reinvestigate all of the evidence to make sure their investigator got it right.
Click to expand...
That's not what I'm suggesting. I have an example from my professional experience (CPA who worked in audit in past lives) which should clear up how I see it.

We gather evidence to support our opinion on the accuracy of a set of financial statements (that we're engaged to audit). For example we would obtain and read all material contracts (lending/debt agreements, contracts with vendors/customers, equity agreements, etc.). Now let's say I have one of my staff read the loan agreement and draft a summary of the main points and accounting/disclosure conclusions and I read the memo. If the audit partner asked me if I reviewed the loan agreement I would never say I did on the basis that I read my staff's memo! And if there was something vague or not consistent and my professional judgement made it clear it was really important to get it right I would sure as hell read the agreement myself and make sure I agree with my staff's conclusions.

Now I fully understand that this is an entirely different field with different practices and I'm open to being wrong (but I do see prosecutors arguing that Barr should have reviewed the evidence) but this is what I mean by review. I'm not asking Barr to recreate evidence or conduct second interviews but shouldn't he read the interviews and other documents to help him make a determination? I can't see how he can determine there was no obstruction by reading Mueller's report itself when Mueller couldn't come to that conclusion!!! That doesn't make sense.
 
Joe said:
Lindsey was so self-righteous about presidential conduct and cleansing the presidency. What happened?

Click to expand...



The Dems and their 2 YEAR "witch hunt" happened.

They got their report and they didn't like it.

Graham says "TOUGH SHIT. IT'S OVER" which is what he's saying here by saying he won't have Mueller over to testify.
 
tehJameson said:
For some reason i don't see him in a hearing anytime soon though.
Click to expand...
It's ridiculous people are interpreting his words like he is dead or in a coma. Get him up there to end this bs. But the senate is not going to do that.
 
lilelvis said:
I didn't say it was ok, I said it's not racist. Is it ok to call people racists when they aren't being racists?

Are you implying that @PolishHeadlock2 is stupid, so that makes all polish people stupid?

JK - I get it, but just admit you misused the term "racist" and stop demanding that I agree with you. The overuse of "racist" is REALLY fucking worn out.
Click to expand...
What is worn out is what you're doing. You agree it's not ok but want to harp on whether being polish is a race or not? Give me a break. And I'm not demanding you agree, you fucking quoted me with this nonsense.
 
lilelvis said:
I didn't say it was ok, I said it's not racist. Is it ok to call people racists when they aren't being racists?

Are you implying that @PolishHeadlock2 is stupid, so that makes all polish people stupid?

JK - I get it, but just admit you misused the term "racist" and stop demanding that I agree with you. The overuse of "racist" is REALLY fucking worn out.
Click to expand...

Okay, if you are being pedantic about the term racist being used in this context, what term should we all use going forward?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,903
Messages
58,326,465
Members
176,000
Latest member
Markooz86

Share this page

Back
Top