- Joined
- Feb 10, 2009
- Messages
- 54,934
- Reaction score
- 35,293
I thought they banned your racist ass.
Cut off one head...
I thought they banned your racist ass.
Your point? A movie costing more doesn't mean more people will go see it.
Making money with no star power or big budget is uncommon. Making money with a big budget, a household name star and tons of flashy CGI is not. People take more notice of the uncommon than they do of what is common.
Also Crazy Rich Asians was a critical and financial success. It recovered it's budget and it's P&A many times over. The Meg was a critical failure and made some profit.
The reason people complained about a black james bond is because of the liberal hypocrisy. They constantly complain about hollywood “whitewashing” movies like prince of persia, ghost in the shell, last samurai, the departed, etc.... But are okay with a black james bond. No one would be annoyed with a black james bond if this werent the casewe just had a massive thread where dozens of Shertards bitched about the mere insinuation of a black James Bond- and within it were countless examples of movies where a black casting resulted in immense butthurt by regressive white racists. For you to claim there has never been "bitching" by whites is stunning and willful ignorance on your part.
I am attributing things you've said in this thread and concluding you are a reactionary shithead.You are attributing things said to me that I never said, and you have the nerve to call other people "shitheads?"
The point remains true. People expect a certain level of consistency, and they react when that expectation is challenged.
Holy shit, this argument was already blown the fuck out in the thread referred. I'm not wasting 20 more pages to educate stubborn fools.The reason people complained about a black james bond is because of the liberal hypocrisy. They constantly complain about hollywood “whitewashing” movies like prince of persia, ghost in the shell, last samurai, the departed, etc.... But are okay with a black james bond. No one would be annoyed with a black james bond if this werent the case
Asian Americans consist of 20 million people. African Americans are 40 million. Both are distinct from Asians or Africans. Saying Japanese cinema has Japanese actors is irrelevant when Asian Americans have been invisible.in American media.I don't see the big deal. Korea, China, Japan, etc. All have a rich history of great films (seven samurai, old boy, internal affairs, akira, police academy 3 supercop). Thats how many movies with an all Asian cast? So who cares if they speak English now?
take it easy man. im not being hostile towards youHoly shit, this argument was already blown the fuck out in the thread referred. I'm not wasting 20 more pages to educate stubborn fools.
Asian Americans consist of 20 million people. African Americans are 40 million. Both are distinct from Asians or Africans. Saying Japanese cinema has Japanese actors is irrelevant when Asian Americans have been invisible.in American media.
Hilarious how you're using this as a counterargument while you bitch about minorities in cinema. The only agenda is the prevalence of whites in Hollywood.
I am attributing things you've said in this thread and concluding you are a reactionary shithead.
Plenty of movies without a huge budget do well. Also who cares what critics think lol.
I dont really care if people like this movie. I myself have no plans to watch it. What I do take issue with are the posters claiming its success is due to some agenda driven push.No. You were also attributing things to me that others have said and I have not said.
People like what they like. Get over it, dude.
fair enough, I apologize for being testy.take it easy man. im not being hostile towards you
Maybe in the horror genre, but generally no, they don't.
One or two low budget movies a year may pull off something like this, and it's usually still star driven (La La Land) or linked to an award nomination (moonlight, whiplash). But this was neither. The last non star driven, low budget movie to make 7 or 8 times it's budget back in theaters before awards was Slumdog. Even that had a superstar director. Take that off the table and you have to go back to like My Big Fat Greek Wedding.
Also the media cares what critics have to say. That's why people are making a big deal about it.
Both are being crushed this week by The Nun. No doubt due to a secret cabal of evil nuns running Hollywood.I haven't seen either film and I don't mean to belittle the success and relevancy of Crazy Rich Asians, but it seems to be getting almost all the attention and people are saying it was the ideal movie to end the Summer blockbuster season on, yet The Meg was the more successful one. Drew a much bigger audience.
The Meg: 475 million in four weeks
Crazy Rich Asians: 149 million in three weeks
Why is The Meg being so underrated?
It's this.the MEG was produced from the outstart to be a blockbuster hit. Crazy Rich Asians is a book adaptation with low box office expectations and turned out to be a massive hit- the biggest romantic comedy in like 20 years.
Because crazy rich asians has to do with racial inclusion. And liberal america loves that bullshit