International The Department of War.

avenue94 said:
We definitely tried to destroy them, while also propping up an alternative government.
Click to expand...

We dd not try to destroy them thats bullshit. We fought a limited police action which was stupid and a waste.
 
Hellowhosthat said:
You weren't trying to destroy the Taliban?

What the fuck?
Click to expand...

No because we fought like a police action limited. Like we were going to bring "democracy" to the people that didn't want it or at best didn't care about it. It was stupid and a waste.
 
jefferz said:
So why did the name need to be changed?
Click to expand...
It didnt but it was also the original name. The Department of Defense was a name change. Some of you guys need to open a history book. This trivia question would be answered during a book about George Washingtons presidency. They simply changed the name back. And its more honest a name considering how our country operates.
 
italiamusica said:
Another pathetic move on Trumps part, Pete Hegseth was probably jerking off at the thought of it and begged Trump to rename it.

I thought countries are supposed to be diplomatic and respectful, not FUCKING DEPARTMENT OF WAR MOTHERFUCKERS, shit is just stupid. But the DTS retard crowd that buys Trump bibles, meme coin, steak, dildos, anal beads, will be eating this up and loving it.
Click to expand...
Its the original name you fucking idiot, since George Washington. Changed after WW2. The Department of Defense is double speak like all you retards like to bitch about. Its amazing how little history people in the warroom read.
 
AZ103 said:
It didnt but it was also the original name. The Department of Defense was a name change. Some of you guys need to open a history book. This trivia question would be answered during a book about George Washingtons presidency. They simply changed the name back. And its more honest a name considering how our country operates.
Click to expand...

So, you still didn’t explain why it needed to be changed.
At this point it just seems like a big waste of money to change the name.
 
jefferz said:
So, you still didn’t explain why it needed to be changed.
At this point it just seems like a big waste of money to change the name.
Click to expand...
Maybe because it’s full blown propaganda. At this point in the Information Age it’s belittling to the citizens and makes the government look ridiculous.
 
Stoic1 said:
You mean like the founding fathers of our country? Another history buff I see.
Click to expand...

The Founding Fathers of our Country etched it into the Constitution that black people are 3/5 of a person to protect the Capital Interests of the South, and drafted the Constitution as well as forming the Senate as roadblocks for the direct democracy promoted by the HoR. Pretty sure only white men who owned land could vote as well.

So yeah, my point still stands. Kinda fascy.

Might want to look at why it was changed.
 
AZ103 said:
It didnt but it was also the original name. The Department of Defense was a name change. Some of you guys need to open a history book. This trivia question would be answered during a book about George Washingtons presidency. They simply changed the name back. And its more honest a name considering how our country operates.
Click to expand...

The Department of Defense was not merely a name change. But this us a good demonstration of how Historical ignorance can convince Americans that a stupid idea is a good one.
 
jefferz said:
So, you still didn’t explain why it needed to be changed.
At this point it just seems like a big waste of money to change the name.
Click to expand...

MAGAtards are too deep up Trump's anus to realize that the US expanded the scope of the War Department and made a conscious effort after WWII to at least not seem like a geopolitical aggressor (even though we clearly continued our Imperialism). The ONLY reason to make this change is an outward projection of hostility at a time where we are already becoming increasingly economically isolated. The US taxpayers will be charged our money to FURTHER alienate foreign Nations.

Genius. 4-D chess.
 
oldshadow said:
No because we fought like a police action limited. Like we were going to bring "democracy" to the people that didn't want it or at best didn't care about it. It was stupid and a waste.
Click to expand...

I'm not saying it wasn't a bad idea but you definitely tried to eliminate the Taliban. The issue is more that the Taliban isn't a force that's going to just fight you on the battlefield.
 
Sinister said:
The Founding Fathers of our Country etched it into the Constitution that black people are 3/5 of a person to protect the Capital Interests of the South, and drafted the Constitution as well as forming the Senate as roadblocks for the direct democracy promoted by the HoR. Pretty sure only white men who owned land could vote as well.

So yeah, my point still stands. Kinda fascy.

Might want to look at why it was changed.
Click to expand...

LOL.

Didn't know it used to be the Dept of War.

Struggles trying to tie it into the Constitution so that he can...

...

Panic wrestle into RACISM! Everything is a racism!
 
Hellowhosthat said:
I'm not saying it wasn't a bad idea but you definitely tried to eliminate the Taliban. The issue is more that the Taliban isn't a force that's going to just fight you on the battlefield.
Click to expand...

No we played at it with no commitment to getting it done. Of we were going to to that we never should have put boots on the ground and and bases. It was the stupid shit of bringing democracy. Thats not to going to happen especially when the people there care nothing about it.

Of course they are not going to fight big open battles. If you are going to destroy them you destroy the country completely not try to "liberate" it or try to occupy it once you are done.

Now something or someone will rise up in their place which is fine as long as they behave and get their shot to themselves. If not you send them back to the stone age again where they are rubbing two sticks together to try and start a fire.
 
Fox by the Sea said:
you can't possibly expect anyone to believe you know latin lol. come on now.
Click to expand...

Why would I care what anyone believes? You made an insinuation, I responded. Left-handed people have been classed as "evil" for a long time in human History, hence WHY the latin word has a negative connotation. I was a boxer, it was a good name for a left-handed boxer who also happens to be well-read.

Whether anyone believes that or not is inconsequential
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,282,951
Messages
58,472,276
Members
176,047
Latest member
derpmaster3000

Share this page

Back
Top