• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Social The daily "AOC says something stupid on Twitter" thread.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well I appreciate someone actually attempting to defend the source. Apparently, that's quite the tall order for most on this board.

But is that really how you'd summarize that exchange? It looked a lot like one guy squirming from giving a concrete answer. Not rebuttals.

The average exchange was:

AOC: So you signed off on this recommendation?
ICE: I signed off on a lot of things. I did it to save lives.
AOC: Yeah, but you signed this one right here, recommending child seperation.
ICE: I recommended lots of things on that memo. It probably saved lives.
AOC: Yeah, but you specifically said that this particular policy is the one you are recommending and signed it.
ICE: I've had tons of conversation and have signed many things. They were always done to save lives.

That doesn't come off as someone correcting anyone. It comes off as a guy dodging the question. And I get it, he doesn't want to be the one responsible for a such a stupid policy.

You really think this was a strong rebuttal, let alone one that "destroyed" his opponent?

Wow . . . goes to show how people can watch the same video and hear completely different things to fit their own take.
 
Her politics quite aside, I thought this was very attractive photo of AOC

merlin_157852251_e30ac250-4cf8-4785-9542-6cb7de5c000d-articleLarge.jpg
 
Her politics quite aside, I thought this was very attractive photo of AOC

merlin_157852251_e30ac250-4cf8-4785-9542-6cb7de5c000d-articleLarge.jpg
She's cute for a politician but that's only because almost every politician is horrendous-looking.

Compared to women in general, she's just weird-looking.
 
The green deal makes the grandiose claim that within ten years a country with the travel volume of America will be able to expand high-speed rail to a scale where air travel stops becoming necessary. So it would seem reasonable to ask questions like, what technology are you using? How does it work? How is it made? Where is it made? What infrastructures are in place to create something of this size? Will you have to build new infrastructures before yoy can even start on this? Who is going to be making all this? What is the cost? And so on.

But no, don't you dare ask questions like that or AOC will accuse you of harassing a woman of color. Then you've got guys like the white knight in this thread producing walls of text without actually answering a single thing, all the while arrogantly telling you it's you who doesn't understand this idiotic deal.

Where did AOC refuse to explain or answer questions on the GND? You have made thiis narrative up in your head. And you clearly don't know anything about the GND beyond what you've seen on FOX news, and read from hack conservative twiitter feeds.

It is a NON BINDING RESOLUTIION. It is a rough draft plan to get shit started. It is not a set of laws, or a guranteed plan to go completely green in 10 yeears. It is a way to staart the process.
The costs have been talked about .. How to implement it is described. How to pay for it has been talked about.
Had you actually READ the plan, you would know alll of this.

You cann disaggreee with the plan, but the plan and explanation exists both in writing, and straight out of AOC''s mouth. There is like an hour long videeo of her and others being interviewed and talkliing bout the GND in depth that i posted earlier in this thrread that none of you watchedd.
You keep typing up this nonsense, without having actuallly read the plan for yourself, Or listened to a full discusssion on it.
 
Last edited:
Not knowing fed law when you are interrogating a fed agent is kind of a dumbass thing to do.

She looked stupid here. As did most of those who want open borders because they have the same dumbass ideology.
Not knowing Fed law?

Do you know how many laws there are? Thousands. Literally thousands. Nobody has an encyclopedic memory of every law. Even still, this is just a dumb attack. You act like she didn't know what FBI stands for.
And it isn't an interrogation. If you think it is, you are missing the point of what she's doing, and the whole point of these committee meetings.

And you again missed the point on what she was trying to say. The point isn't that she "didn’t know the law", her whole point was that there was no terrorism charge available for white supremacy groups, but there are for Muslim terrorist groups. White hate groups weren't being treated as terrorists while brown groups are. THAT is the issue.
She is saying that there SHOULD be a charge.
The purpose of these committees is to get people/experts on record so that Congress can then act on their testimony by making legislation.
 
Not knowing Fed law?

Do you know how many laws there are? Thousands. Literally thousands. Nobody has an encyclopedic memory of every law. Even still, this is just a dumb attack. You act like she didn't know what FBI stands for.
And it isn't an interrogation. If you think it is, you are missing the point of what she's doing, and the whole point of these committee meetings.

And you again missed the point on what she was trying to say. The point isn't that she "didn’t know the law", her whole point was that there was no terrorism charge available for white supremacy groups, but there are for Muslim terrorist groups. White hate groups weren't being treated as terrorists while brown groups are. THAT is the issue.
She is saying that there SHOULD be a charge.
The purpose of these committees is to get people/experts on record so that Congress can then act on their testimony by making legislation.

I was commenting on her interrogation of border agents.


So im not surprised i missed the point.
 
I was commenting on her interrogation of border agents.


So im not surprised i missed the point.

I thought pan and trots were the biggest white knights of she guevara but this guy has essentially gone to 11, sad
 
I thought pan and trots were the biggest white knights of she guevara but this guy has essentially gone to 11, sad
Lol keep chirping from the sidelines like the little Chihuahua you are .
Don't be mad because you're too dumb to put your own thoughts to writing.

TDS, she Guevara, white knight, cuck. Lol you guys come up with the best lines...and then repeat them ad nauseum like retarded parrots
<36>
 
It's impossible.
No way is the country ever going to be traversed by trains rather then automobiles or planes.
The idea to retrofit buildings to be green would produce far more emissions the it would reduce and to reach her goal it would have to be done at a rate of 27 building a minute.
And all for not unless every nation on Earth does the same.
Nevermind that we are currently the largest reducer of emissions.
It's simple retardation is what it is.
Methane gas contributes more green house gas than planes trains and automobile combined.
 
Lol keep chirping from the sidelines like the little Chihuahua you are .
Don't be mad because you're too dumb to put your own thoughts to writing.

TDS, she Guevara, white knight, cuck. Lol you guys come up with the best lines...and then repeat them ad nauseum like retarded parrots
<36>

Hahaha, what is this? Is this a troll account of the goof troop? You actually serious with these comments? Of course I laugh from the sidelines, it’s fun
 
She asked specifically about domestic terrorism charges which don't exist for anyone repeatedly. There's no different charges that a terrorist can be charged with that a white supremacist can't be. It was spelled out for her over and over.
And still neither you nor her understand that simple fact.

Let's talk about pollution.
We're doing more to reduce it than any other nation on Earth already. We've cleaner air and water, in fact some water has gotten to clean creating negative impacts. Clean energy comes from nuclear reactors, not windmills and solar. Build salt reactors, get clean safe, affordable energy.

Create a path to citizenship for illegal aliens and get rid of the stupid deadly rider allowing people with children to stay automatically. It's causing children to die and be trafficked. Unfortunately Dems want no part of this solution and have refused so move forward with even a discussion of such.

She's a loud mouth and that's why she was chosen to fill the position. It wasn't her idea to run, she's a puppet.
And she absolutely runs from the press and will not sit and speak with anyone who has a different view. Structured scripted presser, you bet.

She's a dumb puppet.


There is a domestic terrorist charge, but it's not what the groups she was talking about were charged with. She was mistaken there.
The Muslim shooters were charged with 'homegrown violent extremist' charges, and the white supremacists were charged with hate crimes. The charge is technically different, but it isn't hard to see the confusion. They don't seem that different. She was technically wrong on the charge, but it wasn't the ridiculous mistake you're making it out to be. Her point of why the white supremacist groups can't be classified the same way the Muslim group was her point, and it's a valid question.

Again, we are the 2nd largest polluter in the world. How much we're reducing doesn't mean shit if we're still the 2nd biggest polluter WHILST having the power and resources to change our emissions much more dramatically AND pressure other nations to do the same. We are 5% of the human population and emit the 2nd most amount of pollution. That is fucked up.

The GND is not only about solar and wind. It is about ANY clean and renewable energy. It is the government giving incentives to companies to develop new tech. Take away subsidies to oil companies and invest in renewable tech. That doesn't just mean solar panels. It's looking at our farming techniques, it's looking at carbon capture tech, it's very open on what we should be doing to get clean.
Im down with nuclear energy if we make it safe. But we have to actually invest the money to get there. We have to have committees and debates on this in the House and the Senate. ..debates that have been blocked by the Republicans

You guys shit on AOC for the GND, but where is the Republican plan ? What Republican has talked about doing anything?
 
There is a domestic terrorist charge, but it's not what the groups she was talking about were charged with. She was mistaken there.
The Muslim shooters were charged with 'homegrown violent extremist' charges, and the white supremacists were charged with hate crimes. The charge is technically different, but it isn't hard to see the confusion. They don't seem that different. She was technically wrong on the charge, but it wasn't the ridiculous mistake you're making it out to be. Her point of why the white supremacist groups can't be classified the same way the Muslim group was her point, and it's a valid question.

Again, we are the 2nd largest polluter in the world. How much we're reducing doesn't mean shit if we're still the 2nd biggest polluter WHILST having the power and resources to change our emissions much more dramatically AND pressure other nations to do the same. We are 5% of the human population and emit the 2nd most amount of pollution. That is fucked up.

The GND is not only about solar and wind. It is about ANY clean and renewable energy. It is the government giving incentives to companies to develop new tech. Take away subsidies to oil companies and invest in renewable tech. That doesn't just mean solar panels. It's looking at our farming techniques, it's looking at carbon capture tech, it's very open on what we should be doing to get clean.
Im down with nuclear energy if we make it safe. But we have to actually invest the money to get there. We have to have committees and debates on this in the House and the Senate. ..debates that have been blocked by the Republicans

You guys shit on AOC for the GND, but where is the Republican plan ? What Republican has talked about doing anything?

I gave you a like for saying there is a domestic terrorism charge then turning on yourself to say that in fact there is not. Very nice.

We have safe nuclear energy options available with salt reactors that will also help clean up the environment by using nuclear waste as power. Currently we have enough nuclear waste to power the entire US for over 100 years through salt reactors that can burn it to nearly nothing.

We're going gang busters making farming greener. Today I've a $480k machine that's so much cheaper, cleaner, and more efficient to operate that my old 4020 1970 John Deere that's paid for itself multiple times over isn't practical to use. It's cheaper to buy the new equipment and cleaner to run. Nevermind all the set aside, set backs, and water conservation practices we are forced to adhere to by the ASCS offices.
 
"As I say to these people, come to my basement. I have these signs about single-payer from 30 years ago. I understand what they’re saying. But we have a responsibility to get something done, which is different from advocacy. We have to have a solution, not just a Twitter fight,"

“While there are people who have a large number of Twitter followers, what's important is that we have large numbers of votes on the floor of the House,”



lol Pelosi sneakingly savage with the insults....Just putdown and dismissed. I understand how she cucked Donny earlier this year with that SOTU speech.
The old hag still has some things up her sleeve.
iu
 
You cann disaggreee with the plan, but the plan and explanation exists both in writing, and straight out of AOC''s mouth. There is like an hour long videeo of her and others being interviewed and talkliing bout the GND in depth that i posted earlier in this thrread that none of you watchedd

OK then, I'll try one last time. What technologies are these trains going to be running on? The most advanced system at the minute is The Shinkansen but that can't maintain its top speeds for anything near the kind of distances that would be required to live deliver on the bold claim of being able to make air travel unnecessary in a country the size of America. Quote me directly form the GND where they explain this.
 
OK then, I'll try one last time. What technologies are these trains going to be running on? The most advanced system at the minute is The Shinkansen but that can't maintain its top speeds for anything near the kind of distances that would be required to live deliver on the bold claim of being able to make air travel unnecessary in a country the size of America. Quote me directly form the GND where they explain this.

We've just got to invent the technology.
Pay attention she's repeated it many times.
And then, then we'll invent a way to procure the land.
And we'll just pay for it. Lol!
 
OK then, I'll try one last time. What technologies are these trains going to be running on? The most advanced system at the minute is The Shinkansen but that can't maintain its top speeds for anything near the kind of distances that would be required to live deliver on the bold claim of being able to make air travel unnecessary in a country the size of America. Quote me directly form the GND where they explain this.
You're still not understanding what the GND is. You cant have an honest conversation about this if you aren't going to start on the same page as I am.

The GND is not law. It is not an exact plan. It does not say the technology exists to do everything it wants to do. It is the direction we should be going. That is the point. So I dont know why you're focusing on trains. It isn't a Shinkansen bill. Again, you could actually read the thing yourself to see exactly what it says.

The purpose of the deal is to get the government to make the environment a priority. Whether it be via trains, electric cars, WHATEVER technology available or fields that need government investment, that's what our priority should be.
Unless you're an oil company, what are you against?
 
I gave you a like for saying there is a domestic terrorism charge then turning on yourself to say that in fact there is not. Very nice.

We have safe nuclear energy options available with salt reactors that will also help clean up the environment by using nuclear waste as power. Currently we have enough nuclear waste to power the entire US for over 100 years through salt reactors that can burn it to nearly nothing.

We're going gang busters making farming greener. Today I've a $480k machine that's so much cheaper, cleaner, and more efficient to operate that my old 4020 1970 John Deere that's paid for itself multiple times over isn't practical to use. It's cheaper to buy the new equipment and cleaner to run. Nevermind all the set aside, set backs, and water conservation practices we are forced to adhere to by the ASCS offices.
It's a silly point to quibble over. This story didnt happen yesterday so the details weren't fresh in my mind
But it isnt the enormously stupid, embarrassing gaffe youre making it out to be. Most of these stories are just a lot of dumb nitpicking. Arguing over the difference between a domestic terrorist and a home grown violent extremist, as if the latter is common knowledge by anyone outside the FBI.

Aside from that, I dont see what conservatives are bitching about when it comes to the GND. The GND doesn't forbid nuclear power. But it isn't a completely safe technology. And events like Chernobyl and Fukushima are going to make people hesitant to go full nuclear.

But the GND is not a solar and wind energy bill. It's for ANY clean and renewable energy and tech.
And it's not just about energy, it's about stopping our reliance on oil. It's about addressing the massive amount of pollution, garbage, and waste. It's about leading the world to be more clean.
Again, we are only 5% of the world's population and still the 2nd highest emitter. 5%.
What we need to be doing is getting places like China and India to get on green technology. It's called global warming, not North American warming.
What we do and dont do here, and what China does and doesn't do goes beyond our borders.

And again, you guys always dodge the question, but what Republicans EVER talk about the environment? You shit on AOC, and yet I don't see a single Republican even address the issue, let alone have a plan to help solve the problem.
I'm not proclaiming her to be a genius, but she gets a lot of hate when she's the only one who has the balls to put a problem and plan on the table. If you think her plan is dumb, fair enough, then, what's your plan?

I just find the focus on AOC ridiculous. What wise words have you ever heard come out of Mitch Mcconnell's mouth? Or how about Senator Lee of Utah, the guy that brought photos of Aquaman riding sea horses to a Senate hearing, and said that the way to solve global warming was "more babies"? How are we talking about how stupid AOC is in a world where Trump is president and conservatives are still denying the existence of global warming?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top