Not only that, but the given the runtime you'd think they're dedicating a significant amount of the first hour to it being the origin story if Batman.
Nope.
Which begs the question - What Batman story needs 3 hours to be told?
This really intrigues me, and I'm not sure if that's a good or bad way. It intrigues me and it actually makes me WANT to see the movie, IF the few reviewers I trust say its worth seeing.
About a year ago rumors were going around that the filming for the movie was in dire straights and it needed reshoots. Now given the runtime does it mean they weren't 'reshoots,' meaning reshooting scenes because they were shit, but they were shooting additional scenes?
So many questions.