Joe Rogan is a full-time Musk propagandist these days.
I didn't think it was possible.
It kinda amazes me that anyone listens to anything Rogan has to say anymore. He is so far gone it's almost pathetic how far he has fallen.
newsone.com
Anyone can sue anyone in the States, that doesn't mean you're right about anything. Clarkson probably DOESN'T sue him because he knows the script would be subpoenaed and it would be made public knowledge that they indeed did write a breakdown in to the script before it happened.
As I'm sure you are away, the decisions made in courts are not the final arbiter of truth, so I would recommend not leaning so heavily on the court decision in this case.
O.J. Simpson Found Not Guilty In Murder Case On This Day In 1995
On this day in 1995, O.J. Simpson was found not guilty of murdering his estranged wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her companion, Ronald Goldman.
I appreciate your attempt at overly persuasive language, but that doesn't make anything more false or less true.
deadline.com
Oh he's always been a moron, but he used to be a well meaning non-partisan moron.
He was definitely in the right place at the right time. He's one of the first superstar podcasters and now we are living through the podcast era.
That's probably why he pivoted and became a propagandist.
Come on bruh
I actually just read Clarkson's article in (I think) The Independent.
He hates Musk because he once did a review of a Tesla on Top Gear, the Tesla broke down, and therefore the review was negative.
So Musk tried to sue Clarkson like the absolute chimp brain he is
Okay, but you get that you're saying "Don't put too much stock in the courts" while also putting even more stock in a 5 second anecdote, right?
Where's this script? Who was the guy who read it? If he had enough time to read it, he could theoretically have got a photo of it or photocopied it? Is there a single shred of evidence any of that even existed/is true?
The court process, we know, did actually happen. So what's the validity of this counter argument?
Interestingly, this doesn't actually even stem from a Tesla engineer like Musk claims, but Clarkson's successor at Top Gear, the guy who failed in monumental fashion, a guy I don't even know who he is: Chris Harris.
Jeremy Clarkson Wound Up “Something Rotten” By Chris Harris’ Claim On Joe Rogan Podcast That ‘Top Gear’ Faked A Scathing Tesla Review
Jeremy Clarkson denies 'Top Gear' ever faked a Tesla review after Chris Harris claimed on 'The Joe Rogan Experience' that the BBC show was "naughty."
Harris told Rogan they "did Tesla dirty", so that's obviously all Rogan needed. He then brings it up to Musk, and Musk invents an engineer that found a script.
How could an engineer have seen a script when Chris Harris was the one to break the idea to Musk in the first place long after the event?
And if that did happen, why did the script not form part of the legal case by Tesla?
Ok, what about this aren't you getting?
Fair enough mate.
It's also true to say that Tesla had a 100 % market share of EV's in the US, so I'll accept it's unfair to say it's going down because it's going to. 44 % is also too high. They're gonna eventually even out at around... 15 %? And that will be decent, because the market is gonna get saturated quickly.
Anyway, my conclusion all along was that Musk and Rogan can't be taken seriously on this issue regarding Clarkson & Top Gear. The pair of them are not worth quoting in my opinion. Musk just has to take any fleeting criticism from Clarkson on the chin because he lost in a court of law, then lost again, and as far as I can see he is never going to beat Clarkson in a court of law or anywhere else. He has a much bigger platform, though, so I fully expect him to just keep lying about this in the hope the failure of yonder years is overwritten. Which it might be, because that's how truth works these days
Ford had 50% of the passenger vehicle market in the US at one time.
I disagree with your entire 2nd paragraph.
