Summery in March (SCO v 31)

[Jack V Savage]

After the Clintin email investigation concluded I realized that nothing was going to come of it yes. It was over. I did post recently in a thread about reopening the Clinton emails issue that both this and the the Clinton email scandal are over and done now lets all move on.

This is a response to a point I didn't make. You think the investigation is over, fine. Good for you. Do you think that people should stop talking about it, Republicans and the MSM should apologize and admit that they were wrong for ever questioning Clinton's email practices (remember, that the MSM covered it in 2016 more than all other issues combined), etc.?

Feel free to look it up. Stop assuming my argument.

This is strange coming from you.

Also I never said everyone who isnt a republican is an evil monster, theyre some great reasonable Democrats. Im not attacking them, just you for being a complete partisan hackjob mascarading as level headed. Nothing in any of my posts shows me being a hardcore right winger, almost all of your posts show you being a hardcore leftist.

"Masquerading (note spelling) as level-headed" = being level-headed while not a Republican. You can't acknowledge that people who don't blindly follow GOP dogma might have minds of their own, might be normal people who have looked deeply (more deeply than you) into issues and come to different conclusions, etc. It's unfortunate but typical thinking here. Also, FYI, I think actual hardcore leftists, including many here, would laugh at you for thinking that I'm one.

 

[LangfordBarrow]

Right back at ya :

Can *YOU* credibly assert he HAS SEEN evidence to support his ridiculous claims of collusion without being privy to any of the information yourself?


You had stated this in earlier posts : None of us (that includes you) have seen the report.

I'm not the one making the claim he should resign.

 

[LangfordBarrow]

PFFFT! And then "accidentally" one of their "aides" uploads the entire Mueller report onto the internet(unredacted and all).....

Yeah....I don't think so.


Anyway, no later than April 15 is when *EVERYBODY* will get the REDACTED report.

Nadler and his cronies can whine and cry all they want about their stupid deadline.

Did you wake and bake today?

 

[glenwo2]

I'm not the one making the claim he should resign.

The Republicans can say anything they want.

The bottom line is no one knows at the moment what's on that report aside from Mueller and now Barr (and Rosenstein).

And I'm going to say that Barr did NOT misrepresent what Mueller stated which is what he will explain (in detail) when he testifies on May 1st.

 

[glenwo2]

Did you wake and bake today?

Let me get back to you on that.....

 

[Ophydian]

I would agree with you except we had that whole Diane Feinstein "Dr. Ford Letter" fiasco during the Kavanaugh debacle which shows how easily it would be to reveal something by using one of your aides to do your dirty work for you

In other words, I don't trust the Dems NOT to leak the entire report if it's unredacted.

Hell....they could do it and then Blame the Republicans for it.
They blame them for everything else, after all.


Nope. They will WAIT until April 15 or a bit sooner, to receive the Report.....but NOT on April 2nd.

And the report WILL BE Redacted.

*That* will not change.

Major tinfoil hat/CT here but funny they decided on April 15 which is tax day where that many people will not be monitoring the news.

 

[Ophydian]

I would agree with you except we had that whole Diane Feinstein "Dr. Ford Letter" fiasco during the Kavanaugh debacle which shows how easily it would be to reveal something by using one of your aides to do your dirty work for you

In other words, I don't trust the Dems NOT to leak the entire report if it's unredacted.

Hell....they could do it and then Blame the Republicans for it.
They blame them for everything else, after all.


Nope. They will WAIT until April 15 or a bit sooner, to receive the Report.....but NOT on April 2nd.

And the report WILL BE Redacted.

*That* will not change.

Curveball but with that logic, one of the 13 angry Democrats that makes up the OSC team could accidentally leak it.

 

[glenwo2]

Major tinfoil hat/CT here but funny they decided on April 15 which is tax day where that many people will not be monitoring the news.

Are you accusing ME of Tin-foil hat'ism in the same post or am I reading your post wrong?


That would be hilarious, if true, considering the tax day remark immediately after.

 

[bobgeese]

protect the methods from..... congress. Yeah, plausible. if you are fucking retarded.

Yes, they’re the folks you need to redact it from most of all. They leak like a 90 year old bladder.

 

[glenwo2]

Yes, they’re the folks you need to redact it from most of all. They leak like a 90 year old bladder.

He has no clue about what the LAW is.

7437 is a fucking anarchist.

 

[Ophydian]

Are you accusing ME of Tin-foil hat'ism in the same post or am I reading your post wrong?


That would be hilarious, if true, considering the tax day remark immediately after.

No silly. I’m saying I am putting on a tinfoil hat/conspiracy theory.

 

[bobgeese]

He has no clue about what the LAW is.

7437 is a fucking anarchist.

@7437

Is this true?

Potatoes have a better thought through political philosophy.

 

[SBJJ]

Remember when these collusion threads used to be filled with Mod notes to stay on topic and not detail or flame

 

[SBJJ]

It's going to be a shitshow in the end. Lots of redactions leading all sides to choose their own narratives.

I think level headed people will be able to see if the redactions are needed.

I also believe Mueller will speak out if the redactions are placed in order to spin a narrative

It is funny to see some posters wanting no redactions at all when they seemed ok with obvious unneeded redactions in documents the House investigation under Nunes requested

 

[LangfordBarrow]

Let me get back to you on that.....

C'mon, man, lemme get a puff.

 

[glenwo2]

Remember when these collusion threads used to be filled with Mod notes to stay on topic and not detail or flame

 

[glenwo2]

I think level headed people will be able to see if the redactions are needed.

I also believe Mueller will speak out if the redactions are placed in order to spin a narrative

It is funny to see some posters wanting no redactions at all when they seemed ok with obvious unneeded redactions in documents the House investigation under Nunes requested

That's why Mueller will more than likely be subpoenaed as well to testify.

Though I have a feeling that the Dems will not like what he has to say.

 

[glenwo2]

C'mon, man, lemme get a puff.

 

[bobgeese]

Remember when these collusion threads used to be filled with Mod notes to stay on topic and not detail or flame

Well, now that they look like complete idiots, I’d imagine they’re dying for the subject to change.

 

[LangfordBarrow]

I think level headed people will be able to see if the redactions are needed.

I also believe Mueller will speak out if the redactions are placed in order to spin a narrative

It is funny to see some posters wanting no redactions at all when they seemed ok with obvious unneeded redactions in documents the House investigation under Nunes requested

The head of the FBI said the Nunes memo was misleading by omission. Let's not compare that to the Mueller report. As little as necessary should be redacted before Barr releases it.