Summery in March (SCO v 31)

[hillelslovak87]

Nobody except everyone but you.

Way to grammatically cohere. Jesus.

 

[hillelslovak87]

My god...you must really REALLY think I don't know shit about Twitter, huh?

Of course I know that he wouldn't even see it.

And of course I know he wouldn't even care.

He's never cared about the American People.

Why would he care about me and my opinion?

I posted it just 'cause I wanted to post it, so it can be there IN CASE he comes across it.

He doesn't even need to reply.

Only know that there are those who recognize bullshit when they see it.

And even if he doesn't come across it, so fucking what? I see many other tweets where he doesn't reply to them either.

I also follow other people on Twitter that I tweet to but never get any response but so long as my response is there (VISIBLE) where they and others can see, that's all that matters to me.

So you revel in committing a caddy and futile act on purpose? Usually it's babies in loaded diapers who do that.

 

[waiguoren]

Honestly, I can understand why some posters don't love what's happening. I have not and do not trust the DOJ. Can we all imagine if Rod released a 4 page synopsis bashing Trump. I do NOT trust Barr anymore than Rod. I'm to a point that I believe the DOJ is corrupt. Barr will need to earn trust, not just receive it blindly

If he releases a largely redacted report and its obvious it's not just grand jury shit then we should all call him out. On the other hand if its obvious he only redacted what should be redacted then those screaming need to finally give it a rest

I hope Barr is different than Rod. But I'm not holding my breath.

It's going to be a shitshow in the end. Lots of redactions leading all sides to choose their own narratives.

 

[hillelslovak87]

It's going to be a shitshow in the end. Lots of redactions leading all sides to choose their own narratives.

If it's all so great for the president, why not, I dunno, not redact as much as you can, or send it to congress and trust that they can redact relevant information, then? Surely being as transparent as possible would be the right course, no?

 

[waiguoren]

Surely being as transparent as possible would be the right course, no?

Yes.

 

[glenwo2]

So you revel in committing a caddy and futile act on purpose? Usually it's babies in loaded diapers who do that.

speaking from experience?

 

[hillelslovak87]

Yes.

Do you trust William Barr, a Bush styled Republican, to be fair, given his past statements, and the nature of his outlook on America and our political system?

I mean, this is a guy who wanted to put people seeking asylum in Gitmo, all but get rid of death row appeals, and thinks our government and laws are predicated upon christianity.

I, personally think he is somewhat a loon, fitting for the Trump admin.

 

[hillelslovak87]

speaking from experience?

You leave my parties out of this!!!

 

[GSP_37]

I'm sick of assholes saying it's great for the country our pres wasn't found guilty of being Russian ass-hat. He just got away with it. I'm absolutely certain he's a Russian ass-hat.

 

[waiguoren]

I'm sick of assholes saying it's great for the country our pres wasn't found guilty of being Russian ass-hat. He just got away with it. I'm absolutely certain he's a Russian ass-hat.

What is a "Russian ass-hat"?

 

[WTF2008]

If it's all so great for the president, why not, I dunno, not redact as much as you can, or send it to congress and trust that they can redact relevant information, then? Surely being as transparent as possible would be the right course, no?

The President isn't in control of that. Just like he wasn't in control of the investigation.

You get more ridiculous each day.

 

[GSP_37]

"We're not asking for the Mueller Report like a child asks parents for ice cream. We're asking because we're entitled to it."

 

[WTF2008]

"We're not asking for the Mueller Report like a child asks parents for ice cream. We're asking because we're entitled to it."

Entitled to it after it just came out?
That's a normal thing?

And Trump is keeping you from getting it?

 

[WTF2008]

I'm sick of assholes saying it's great for the country our pres wasn't found guilty of being Russian ass-hat. He just got away with it. I'm absolutely certain he's a Russian ass-hat.

Here we have an unbiased not swayed by the media ctrl-left.
There's more than you know and more imported daily.

 

[hillelslovak87]

The President isn't in control of that. Just like he wasn't in control of the investigation.

You get more ridiculous each day.

 

[bobgeese]

I'm sick of assholes saying it's great for the country our pres wasn't found guilty of being Russian ass-hat. He just got away with it. I'm absolutely certain he's a Russian ass-hat.

"We're not asking for the Mueller Report like a child asks parents for ice cream. We're asking because we're entitled to it."

Dare I say gsp has reached the bargaining stage???.

You’re almost there...

 

[7437]

Dare I say gsp has reached the bargaining stage???.

You’re almost there...

Still waiting to see the report. Care to guess why it isn't out yet? Or why they refuse to show it to congress?

 

[LangfordBarrow]

You didn't read my post. I wasn't referring to Mueller's mandate. I was referring to the narrative that Rachael Maddow, Adam Schiff, and @Jack V Savage were promoting.



You haven't seen the Mueller report. Therefore, to refer to Barr's letter as a "partisan summary" as you did suggests to me that you have already jumped to unjustified conclusions about the contents of the Mueller report.


Schiff repeatedly and over a span of two years told media outlets that there was strong evidence of Trump-Russia collusion. That's an excellent example of the prosecutor's fallacy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosecutor's_fallacy). It was also very reckless given the abundance of evidence to the contrary. So I strongly disagree with you that Schiff has done nothing inappropriate.


Why exclude Schiff from that list?


Prosecutors never exonerate. It's a meaningless subject to bring up.


Of course.

Schiff is a member of the gang of eight. Can you credibly assert he hasn't seen evidence to support his claims of collusion without being privy to any of the information yourself?

Mueller made it clear he was not exonerating Trump precisely because he wasn't making a decision on whether to prosecute. It will be Congress' job to decide whether the evidence merits impeachment.

 

[bobgeese]

Still waiting to see the report. Care to guess why it isn't out yet? Or why they refuse to show it to congress?

Are you really this stupid?


Ever hear of protecting sources and methods?


If you think Barr would misrepresent the findings of Meullers report, after consulting with Rosenstien and the OOLC, you’re a confirmed brainlet.

 

[bobgeese]

Schiff is a member of the gang of eight. Can you credibly assert he hasn't seen evidence to support his claims of collusion without being privy to any of the information yourself?

Mueller made it clear he was not exonerating Trump precisely because he wasn't making a decision on whether to prosecute. It will be Congress' job to decide whether the evidence merits impeachment.

Yes, easily.

If anything of substance was found, it would have been leaked that day.