Summery in March (SCO v 31)

[glenwo2]

The head of the FBI said the Nunes memo was misleading by omission. Let's not compare that to the Mueller report. As little as necessary should be redacted before Barr releases it.

Unfortunately, whatever is redacted will be scrutinized by the Dems and accusing Barr of a cover-up even if the redacted parts really are Grand Jury information.

 

[LangfordBarrow]

Unfortunately, whatever is redacted will be scrutinized by the Dems and accusing Barr of a cover-up even if the redacted parts really are Grand Jury information.

Nah, I don't think so, although I'm not really sure how the report will be formatted with that type of information. Random redactions will probably be questioned but Mueller will be available to clear up any suspicions.

 

[glenwo2]

Nah, I don't think so, although I'm not really sure how the report will be formatted with that type of information. Random redactions will probably be questioned but Mueller will be available to clear up any suspicions.

Don't underestimate the lunacy of the Democrats.


Anyway, since Barr is already set to testify on May 1st, they need to subpoena Mueller for either that same day or a day after to Testify as well.

Get as much of the facts as possible and then go from there.

 

[glenwo2]

Trump campaign unveils ‘Pencil-neck Adam Schiff’ T-shirts for sale

 

[glenwo2]

CBS, everyone.

Surprised that wasn't reversed.

 

[SBJJ]

The head of the FBI said the Nunes memo was misleading by omission. Let's not compare that to the Mueller report. As little as necessary should be redacted before Barr releases it.

I've seen absolutely no evidence the Nunes memo was false in any way. Color me shocked the FBI head would dislike a memo pointing out his agencies mistakes and possible corruption

Where were you when the DOJ was releasing incredibly heavy redacted documents to the house in regard to the DOJ/FBI investigation into the campaign

I'm for transparency on both sides......wish more of u guys were also

 

[LangfordBarrow]

I've seen absolutely no evidence the Nunes memo was false in any way. Color me shocked the FBI head would dislike a memo pointing out his agencies mistakes and possible corruption

Where were you when the DOJ was releasing incredibly heavy redacted documents to the house in regard to the DOJ/FBI investigation into the campaign

I'm for transparency on both sides......wish more of u guys were also

It wasn't false, it was misleading by omission, and the FBI head was newly appointed by Trump. Don't make it a partisan battle. Nunes is clearly pushing an agenda.

 

[SBJJ]

It wasn't false, it was misleading by omission, and the FBI head was newly appointed by Trump. Don't make it a partisan battle. Nunes is clearly pushing an agenda.

No evidence of what you are claiming. I don't care if he was new either. Of course the heads of the FBI/DOJ do not want their dirty laundry aired

I'm not the one being partisan
I'm not the poster ok with withholding information from the public depending on who it makes look bad

Oh, and using your logic we need to just blindly believe Barr since he's new to the job.

You will always be welcome to join us on this site that want transparency on everything. Not just for one side

 

[LangfordBarrow]

No evidence of what you are claiming. I don't care if he was new either. Of course the heads of the FBI/DOJ do not want their dirty laundry aired

I'm not the one being partisan
I'm not the poster ok with withholding information from the public depending on who it makes look bad

Oh, and using your logic we need to just blindly believe Barr since he's new to the job.

You will always be welcome to join us on this site that want transparency on everything. Not just for one side

I'd like transparency and truth on all sides as well. Hard to get with this administration but I digress. Barr wrote an I love you note to Trump to get this job. Don't lump him in with Wray who has not yet shown himself to be partisan as far as I've seen.

 

[SBJJ]

I'd like transparency and truth on all sides as well. Hard to get with this administration but I digress. Barr wrote an I love you note to Trump to get this job. Don't lump him in with Wray who has not yet shown himself to be partisan as far as I've seen.

Just reread your post. Wray and the FBI have fought transparency every step of the way. The FBI under Wray has fought to release ANY relevant records.

You do not even realize how partisan you are

And for future reference. This Administration is not in charge of releasing these records, so your post in that regard is partisan also.

 

[LangfordBarrow]

Just reread your post. Wray and the FBI have fought transparency every step of the way. The FBI under Wray has fought to release ANY relevant records.

You do not even realize how partisan you are

And for future reference. This Administration is not in charge of releasing these records, so your post in that regard is partisan also.

Certain things need to be redacted. Just like Barr will have to redact some things. This administration has shown it fights transparency. Believe me, believe me, it's so true. Call me partisan if you like but that won't bolster your argument.

 

[Farmer Br0wn]

Just stalling. Congress is in recess from April 13-28. He's giving the White House narrative a fucking month to breathe and grow.

It's unacceptable, and frankly, it's dangerous to the welfare of this nation.

Only to a hyper-partisan would President Trump's complete exoneration be seen as somehow "dangerous to the welfare of this nation".

It's quite clear that you just personally hate President Trump, and you're desperate to do anything you can to try and remove him from office, even if the removal is objectively unjustified.

What you're really worried about, is now that the Mueller report has been released, people are going to move on in a few weeks and start worrying about something else. You desperately want to comb over any potential detail while this story is still fresh in people's minds. The President has been exonerated, you're worried that no one is going to care about minut details that you may find interesting in a month.

 

[Farmer Br0wn]

If it's all so great for the president, why not, I dunno, not redact as much as you can, or send it to congress and trust that they can redact relevant information, then? Surely being as transparent as possible would be the right course, no?

If you gave an unredacted report to Congress, the Democrats within Congress would leak personal information about President Trump and his family almost immediately.

It's quite sad to say that the Democratic party in congress as a whole can't be trusted with the Presidents personal information.

 

[Farmer Br0wn]

I'm sick of assholes saying it's great for the country our pres wasn't found guilty of being Russian ass-hat. He just got away with it. I'm absolutely certain he's a Russian ass-hat.

^^^^^

Denial stage of grief. Next will come anger, then bargaining, and then after that, eventually acceptance.

 

[BarryDillon]

 

[Farmer Br0wn]

Major tinfoil hat/CT here but funny they decided on April 15 which is tax day where that many people will not be monitoring the news.

Not a CT at all.

Past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior. Within the last year, when the Democrats were in possession of information that they believed to be damaging to the President, it was leaked to the press.

The likelihood of a Democrats Congressional office leaking personal information about President Trump and his family if they were given the unredacted report, is pretty much 100%.

 

[glenwo2]

If you gave an unredacted report to Congress, the Democrats within Congress would leak personal information about President Trump and his family almost immediately.

It's quite sad to say that the Democratic party in congress as a whole can't be trusted with the Presidents personal information.

I daresay that's the precise GOAL of getting an unredacted report. The Democrats want personal information on Trump's family to go attack them.

 

[7437]

@7437

Is this true?

Potatoes have a better thought through political philosophy.

no, not at all. hes just lying because he is an idiot.

 

[glenwo2]

*sigh* Congress won't get an unredacted report.

You can put up tweets of every single liberal talking head out there but come April 15th(or slightly earlier but not April 2nd), both Congress and the White House will receive the redacted report.

and I don't think the SCOTUS will force the AG to give up Grand Jury information that is protected BY LAW.

EDIT : Though I am surprised you didn't put up yet another Seth Abramson tweet.

 

[bobgeese]

no, not at all. hes just lying because he is an idiot.

Well that’s a relief.

It’s one thing to be a liberal or a conservative. Anarchism, is just fucking stupid.