• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Students Suspended Indefinitely For Confederate Flag

Bill Maher spreads his hate equally.

Well to be clear, from what I've seen from Maher he made it pretty clear that, of the two, he has much bigger problems with Islam.

There is certainly a bias in the west where criticism of christianity is applauded and treated as enlightenment while criticism of Islam is seen as racist (and of course might get you killed), so even if someone thinks Islam is 10x worse he may spend equal or more time criticizing christianity.
 
Big D. Showing us how enlightened Canadians think.
 
Well to be clear, from what I've seen from Maher he made it pretty clear that, of the two, he has much bigger problems with Islam.

There is certainly a bias in the west where criticism of christianity is applauded and treated as enlightenment while criticism of Islam is seen as racist (and of course might get you killed), so even if someone thinks Islam is 10x worse he may spend equal or more time criticizing christianity.

Agreed..

All religions aren't equal. Some are more violent than others and therefore, some deserve more criticism than others.

Big D. Showing us how enlightened Canadians think.

I speak for myself, that's about it.
 
Horible human being? Debatable. Bad war strategist? Meh. Took over Europe for 6 years..

Do you deny that he allowed and sanctioned the death of millions of non-combatant civilians for the sake of killing off an entire race/religion? The yellow David stars were not just for looks.

Socially, he had some good ideas, some bad. I like to think of his domestic reign as "fascism with a smiley face." Banned alcohol and tobacco outright, and was a vegan IIRC (which is flawed in itself).

As for war strategy, he made some blunders against his generals' better judgement. His Russian strategy was built on ego and pride, rather than logistics.
 
Do you deny that he allowed and sanctioned the death of millions of non-combatant civilians for the sake of killing off an entire race/religion? The yellow David stars were not just for looks.

Those people that were rounded up and put in camps were considered traitors, the same as internment camps for Japanese in America. However, unlike America, Germany was losing the war which put mass strain on limited resources. Food, medical help, etc, was much less available for their prisoners which contributed to many deaths.

Germans were backed into a corner, and yes atrocities were committed. The fact remains, Heinrich Himmler was the architect of the final solution, not Hitler. Hitler was in poor health and susceptible to being taken advantage of.

Socially, he had some good ideas, some bad. I like to think of his domestic reign as "fascism with a smiley face." Banned alcohol and tobacco outright, and was a vegan IIRC (which is flawed in itself).

Hitler also virtually elimited unemployment during the great depression. Got people back to work. Built the worlds first interstate highway, massive upgrades in infrastructure, built a common mans vehicle, cheap for his people, and yes he banned alcohol and tobacco. Those actions tell me he was a great leader, and that he cared about his people.

Also, I'm not vegan, but why is that flawed?

As for war strategy, he made some blunders against his generals' better judgement. His Russian strategy was built on ego and pride, rather than logistics.

True, he undoubtedly made war mistakes.
 
A Hitler apologist. Wow.
 
I don't remember D being this nuts. Have I been reading the wrong threads? If, as you said previously in here, Hitler was just taking back what was once part of Germany, wouldn't then, say, Spain be able to take over The Netherlands under this justification? Etc etc etc. Different powers have been swapping land in Europe since history has been recorded.

Then you compared Japanese internment camps with the Holocaust...oy vey.

Hitler led 10's of millions to their death in WW2...and also supported the fascists in the Spanish Civil War...but he was A-OK because before he destroyed Europe and tore countless lives apart, he helped unemployment and stuff?

Do you think the increased prosperity enjoyed by the German citizens from 1933-1939 really outweighs what happened from 1940 to 1945?
 
Those people that were rounded up and put in camps were considered traitors,

Why were they considered traitors?

Germans were backed into a corner, and yes atrocities were committed. The fact remains, Heinrich Himmler was the architect of the final solution, not Hitler. Hitler was in poor health and susceptible to being taken advantage of.

Hitler was a crazed drug addict by his death. "Poor health," maybe he can keep blaming the Jewish prostitute.


Hitler also virtually elimited unemployment during the great depression. Got people back to work. Built the worlds first interstate highway, massive upgrades in infrastructure, built a common mans vehicle, cheap for his people, and yes he banned alcohol and tobacco. Those actions tell me he was a great leader, and that he cared about his people.

So after all that, Hitler's poor health could attribute to him being taken advantage of, in terms of killing millions of civilians? I think not. He might have been insane, but he wasn't oblivious.

Also, I'm not vegan, but why is that flawed?

I believe that as omnivores, evolution has dictated our bodies sustain on meat and fruits/vegetables/wheat/oats/etc. Our teeth are made for meat. To deny that could cause health problems (soy illness, lack of protein, etc etc.)
 
Don't care about the suspensions; play stupid games and win stupid prizes.

I am, however, disappointed in the journalism. Heroic restraint my ass. This is the kind of melodramatic language the liberals on this board have a love affair with abusing.

That's a fact!

People have become the biggest bunch of pansies! I can't remember when I was ever bored enough to care what is printed on someone's t-shirt or attire they decide to wear, nor would I ever wasted my time complaining to a superior about something so ridiculous that has absolutely no effect or barring on my day. In fact I would be embarrassed that I was such a mental weak sack that I'm offended by something so ridiculous as a t-shirt someone else is wearing!

Nearly every person who has some sort of printing of the confederate flag aren't wearing it because their an advocate of slavery. I know when I was a kid I use to think the flag looked cool mostly because it was on the top of the Dukes of Hazard car and I was a big fan of the show. I didn't have a clue what it stood for. Based on people's reactions today you'd think the flag only stood for the support of slavery.

The comment made by Cregan the principle were pretty shocking. The restraint he showed is exactly what was expected and demanded from each and every American! Does he think African Americans are usually incapable of showing restraint?
 
Hitler was in poor health and susceptible to being taken advantage of.

what-the-fuck.gif
 
Oh this thread turned interesting.

questioning white washed history can actually be pretty enlightening. Not many people can do it without emotional melt downs though so there usually isn't much point.
 
Oh this thread turned interesting.

questioning white washed history can actually be pretty enlightening. Not many people can do it without emotional melt downs though so there usually isn't much point.
What has your research on Hitler turned up?
 
What has your research on Hitler turned up?

I found who was funding the war is interesting. Private bankers, Wallstreet, etc.

The crippling of German economy before hand. It's almost as though it was deliberate.
 
It's almost like you've become sadly and laughably predictable. Weird, right?

If you follow them through history it is the ones who control the money who are behind most wars and conflicts.

Wars cost money, but are also extremely profitable when you lend money to both sides.

When the dust settles, the bankers own and all countries involved have to work to pay off their war debts.

History is written by the Victor right? Well who is the victor? This is the part left out of main stream history.
 
The Rothschild Joo Mothafuckers.

THEM
 
If you follow them through history it is the ones who control the money who are behind most wars and conflicts.

Wars cost money, but are also extremely profitable when you lend money to both sides.

When the dust settles, the bankers own and all countries involved have to work to pay off their war debts.

History is written by the Victor right? Well who is the victor? This is the part left out of main stream history.

From my recollection, the Allies won World War II.
 
From my recollection, the Allies won World War II.

What did they really win?

The winners are the oligarchs, who are more powerful than ever.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top