Story of Jesus Christ was 'fabricated to pacify the poor', claims Biblical scholar Joseph Atwill

[meauneau]

I accept your surrender

You concede the fact that you have been running away from him all the time...

 

[lfd0311]

I already answered that a couple of times. If you can't remember do your work and look for them.

Lol. You’re pathetic. Trying to pretend you were talking about something else is embarrassing, especially since I asked you more than one what you where talking about and you didnt respond

 

[lfd0311]

You concede the fact that you have been running away from him all the time...

Again your collective inability to understand print is not my fault. That’s what has held this conversation back.

 

[meauneau]

What would you think my opinions on that would be, judging by what I’ve said in this thread.

Judging by what you have said in this thread I think your opinions would be very stupid.

How about you do your work and state your opinions rather than have someone state them for you so you can accuse him of strawmaning you.

 

[lfd0311]

Judging by what you have said in this thread I think your opinions would be very stupid.

How about you do your work and state your opinions rather than have someone state them for you so you can accuse him of strawmaning you.

25th dick tuck of the thread is noted

 

[Trotsky]

@Fawlty
You best believe this cringey display will be getting End of the Year consideration. It's like a car crash montage that lasts 45 minutes.

 

[meauneau]

25th dick tuck of the thread is noted

So why don't you tell me what your opinion is concerning the reliability of the testimony for the resurrection of Jesus?

 

[lfd0311]

So why don't you tell me what your opinion is concerning the reliability of the testimony for the resurrection of Jesus?

You should have been able to gather that by everything I’ve said in this thread, but, as with every single thing I’ve said here, you’re projecting your own beliefs and own opinions into what I’m saying instead of just reading and understanding what I’m saying and then responding to it.

 

[meauneau]

You should have been able to gather that by everything I’ve said in this thread, but, as with every single thing I’ve said here, you’re projecting your own beliefs and own opinions into what I’m saying instead of just reading and understanding what I’m saying and then responding to it.

@lfd0311What is your opinion regarding the reliability of the testimony for the resurrection of Jesus?

I cannot infer an answer to this from your posts. You will have to answer it directly, if you have the balls.

 

[lfd0311]

Care to cite? The first post of yours that I see here does nothing of the sort. But...you admitted to being wrong in the same post that you cited this "well-documented" fact that you've been poop-dollaring for the past 25 pages?

@Trotsky this post look familiar guy? Maybe.... try reading?

 

[Trotsky]

@Trotsky this post look familiar guy? Maybe.... try reading?

You don't even know what you're arguing. You're just shit posting because you got caught being full of shit and are too petulant to fess up.

So it is written.

 

[lfd0311]

You don't even know what you're arguing. You're just shit posting because you got caught being full of shit and are too petulant to fess up.

So it is written.

I know exactly what I’m arguing. Again, your inability to understand isn’t my fault. When you ask me to cite proof of me admitting I was wrong about something, I tell you exactly where to find it and that it’s not my responsibility to find it for you and you in response go off in a totally different direction because you can’t read, that is not, in fact, my fault.

 

[meauneau]

@lfd0311 you claim to be an agnostic, can you elaborate on this? Is it weak or strong agnosticism?

 

[Trotsky]

I know exactly what I’m arguing. Again, your inability to understand isn’t my fault. When you ask me to cite proof of me admitting I was wrong about something, I tell you exactly where to find it and that it’s not my responsibility to find it for you and you in response go off in a totally different direction because you can’t read, that is not, in fact, my fault.

You're hysterical. First it was pretending you provided evidence and refusing to say what it is or where you provided it, and now it's pretending you admitted you're full of shit but refusing to say when or where you admitted such.

Again, it's not our job to change your diapers: if you've exonerated yourself or waved a white flag, prove it.

 

[lfd0311]

@lfd0311 you claim to be an agnostic, can you elaborate on this? Is it weak or strong agnosticism?

How strong would you consider “I’d really like to hope there is some sort of an afterlife because eternal non existence terrifies me”?

Painislife post dude, don’t think I forgot. I answered your question. Not the first of your questions I’ve answered. I’ll take you answering mine now.

 

[lfd0311]

You're hysterical. First it was pretending you provided evidence and refusing to say what it is or where you provided it, and now it's pretending you admitted you're full of shit but refusing to say when or where you admitted such.

Again, it's not our job to change your diapers: if you've exonerated yourself or waved a white flag, prove it.

Wait, wait, wait..... this is you still pretending you’re an adult who can admit when he’s wrong, right?

 

[Trotsky]

Wait, wait, wait..... this is you still pretending you’re an adult who can admit when he’s wrong, right?

Source or shut the fuck up.

 

[lfd0311]

Source or shut the fuck up.

Exactly. You’re too much of a child to simply say “oh, I misunderstood which part of my post you were addressing. But since I’m a (self professed) intelligent adult, I’m willing to concede I made a mistake.”

 

[Trotsky]

Exactly. You’re too much of a child to simply say “oh, I misunderstood which part of my post you were addressing. But since I’m a (self professed) intelligent adult, I’m willing to concede I made a mistake.”

Source or shut the fuck up.

 

[meauneau]

How strong would you consider “I’d really like to hope there is some sort of an afterlife because eternal non existence terrifies me”?

What you hope and fear doesn't weaken or strengthen your agnosticism. What makes it weak or strong is your attitude towards knowledge claims about God. Weak agnosticism says that we don't know but maybe we will know but we don't know. Strong agnosticism says that we don't know and we will never know.

What your response makes you is a strong ignorant.