- Joined
- May 12, 2010
- Messages
- 24,615
- Reaction score
- 1,315
Source or shut the fuck up.
Lol. Owned. Again. It’s so funny watching you self destruct.
Last edited:
Source or shut the fuck up.
What you hope and fear doesn't weaken or strengthen your agnosticism. What makes it weak or strong is your attitude towards knowledge claims about God. Weak agnosticism says that we don't know but maybe we will know but we don't know. Strong agnosticism says that we don't know and we will never know.
What your response makes you is a strong ignorant.
Lol. Owned. Again. It’s so funny watching you self destruct.
Source or shut the fuck up.
If you read the New Testament epistles you’ll see that the early church had all sorts of problems stemming from the fact that it was made up of converts from other religions who brought preconceived ideas with them, people from differing nationalities and very different social standings.As far as I know a lot of the literal interpretations of the bible come from evangelicals no?
I would assume Christian's back then followed Jesus teaching closer but I dont know.
How fucking hard is it for you to just read what I wrote? You claim to be an intelligent person. Read, then understand. I’m not going to continue writing it out over and over for you to constantly misunderstand simple, written English and then pretend that your inability to understand is somehow my fault.
EDIT: I called it a well documented fact because it is.
Bro.
100% of your posts are either:
1) Absurd unsubstantiated claims.
2) Demands to re-read your absurd unsubstantiated claims.
3) Butthurt jibberish where you use words you find impressive incorrectly.
If you are consciously packing that much bullshit into your short posts you are truly gifted
For real though man, you haven't convincingly (or even unconvincingly) supported your hypothesis that Pilate wrote about Jesus, with the writings being preserved and later destroyed to hide the truth. Also, the Jesus myth came on the scene far earlier than you suppose, I believe.
Like I said before, it's an interesting idea and I would be interested in exploring it, it's just there isn't support for it.
Sure thing, lemme call Dan Brown and we'll get right on it.Your answers are in his name.
Sure thing, lemme call Dan Brown and we'll get right on it.
You are the one who refuses to tell anyone what you are arguing.Exactly. You can’t even tell me what you think I’m arguing, in your own words, for whatever reason.
You are the one who refuses to tell anyone what you are arguing.
I already answered all your questions and you answered all of mine. We can end it and start something new and relevant to the topic of this thread.I mean.... except for every post I've made. BTW, I've asked one simple question over and over and over again, you've ignored it, except for like the 2 times you tried to act like that's not what you said.
I already answered all your questions and you answered all of mine. We can end it and start something new and relevant to the topic of this thread.
Your opinions on the topic of the OP are uninteresting because you are an agnostic. You are on the fence about supernatural claims, you can't claim anything negative or positive about the supernatural stories revolving around Jesus. You have nothing interesting to say other than that you don't know and hold no positive view and that the idea of eternal nonexistence terrifies you. What's the point of discussing this with you then?
Because it is entertaining to see you getting ridiculed by everyone.No, you didn't and we both know it. You're just too proud to confirm you didn't read what I wrote.
If I'm so uninteresting why do you continue to reply to my posts?
Because it is entertaining to see you getting ridiculed by everyone.
You refuse to state your views and command everyone to do their work and go back sifting through hundreds of posts to find yours and to infer all your views without you having to state them, as if this were a book written in the geometric style. We all see through your BS. You are an insecure agnostic scared of knowing. You are scared of laying out your views because you will have to commit to a view. It's as if your mind's defence mechanism is protecting you from psychological harm. You already admitted that eternal nonexistence terrifies you. No surprise then that your mind is protecting you from the further torment if happens that naturalism is the reasonable view to hold.
Because I have stated them. I shouldn't have to repeat myself over and over in plain English while you read things into it, like you for example. This entire post is once again proof of that. It's again why you're still here. Because you're butt hurt and can't stop projecting views on me that I don't hold, so you can attack them. You've done it over and over and over again, both in this post and in this thread, while openly lying about doing it, in really lazy and childish way. What is it I'm scared of "knowing"?