those are separate. otherwise joe torre would be in as a player tooI also think he should get some credit for managing the Mets in 1969 - Hodges was a strong, silent type guy but was really a smart baseball guy. He didn't talk a lot so that the media didn't fully appreciate his managerial skills. His record as a player should be enough to get him in and the managing record is icing on the cake.
no. to me you should just know who a hall of famer is. should be no doubt. you shouldnt have to wonder. why the hell isnt tim raines in therre? by todays standards he should be. but if its meWhere do y'all set the bar at? Bernie Williams?
There has to be some gray area. The spectrum doesn't go from elite of the elite, to guys who just had really careers. The point is, where do you draw the line? Who is the worst guy go be in, or the best to be out?no. to me you should just know who a hall of famer is. should be no doubt. you shouldnt have to wonder. why the hell isnt tim raines in therre? by todays standards he should be. but if its me
Hall of famer: babe ruth, hank aaron, willie mays, stan musial, derek jeter, greg maddux, cy young, ty cobb, roberto clemente, honus wagner, walter johnson, hank greenberg, jimmy fox, tom seaver, johnny bench, ernie banks, etc.
there is no doubt that those guys are hall of famers.
not a hall of famer: bert blyleven, don sutton, tinkers, evers and chance, bill mazeroski, phil rizzuto, bob lemon, bruce sutter, etc.
now there are so many border line cases, it is all politics. no way lou whitaker isnt better than bill mazeroski for example.
There has to be some gray area. The spectrum doesn't go from elite of the elite, to guys who just had really careers. The point is, where do you draw the line? Who is the worst guy go be in, or the best to be out?
1. Bill James has written a great book on the Hall of Fame and has done all sorts of analysis of who should be in and who shouldn't - he was a big advocate of Ron Santo.
2. If every player who was better than the worst player in the Hall of Fame were to be admitted, we might have two or three thousand players in the HOF.
3. You really have to distinguish "peak value" (a player's best 3 or 4 seasons) and career value. Sandy Koufax had a higher peak value than Warren Spahn but Warren Spahn had a much higher career value.
4. Playing in New York used to help because of media attention.
5. Statistical distortion is a huge factor - batting averages of certain players in 1930 look awesome but you have to remember that the American League average for the entire league including pitchers was .300 - so hitting .330 in that context is no big deal.
6. The same may be true for home run records over the past 25 years.
7. If the standard is - "Is he arguably the GOAT at his position?" I would include -
C - Cochrane, Campanella, Berra, Bench
1B - Gehrig, Foxx
2B - Collins, Hornsby, Robinson, Morgan
SS - Wagner, AROD
3B - Schmidt
OF - Cobb, Speaker, Ruth, Mantle, Mays, Williams, Musial, Henderson(best leadoff hitter ever),
SP - Johnson, Grove, Koufax (peak value), Seaver
RP - Fingers, Rivera
Obviously, the bar has been set much much lower.
belle wasnt blackballed. his hip was shotNot Belle?
belle wasnt blackballed. his hip was shot
i dont remember hearing it. and a quick search didnt turn anything up. his main problem though was that he was an asshole. so it definitely could have thwarted any comeback attempts. he wants an overpaid, hurt asshole on a team?Wikipedia seems to agree with you but I swear I remember hearing black ball stories
me too. grew up going to games in the $3 bleacher seats. I dont think Cecil's run was nearly long enough. but he gave us a couple awesome years.Cecil Fielder and Allan Trammell... and yes I'm a Tigers fan
me too. grew up going to games in the $3 bleacher seats. I dont think Cecil's run was nearly long enough. but he gave us a couple awesome years.
that mid 80's tiger team gets no respect at all. not a single hall of famer when an argument can be made for 6 or 7.
Lou Whitaker- belongs
Alan Trammell- belongs
Lance Parrish- close, but not quite. had he stayed with the tigers, then maybe
Jack Morris- yes
Darrell Evans- close, close, but not quite. though you can argue him over many in now
frank tanana- hall of pretty good. had he not got hurt early in his career, he might of been a legend
chet lemon- no. but he stacks up nicely to jim rice
yea, i lived for the games back then. i was born in 73, so they came into the league just as i got old enough. lou whitaker was my favorite player. i think he had like a .450 avg whenever i watched him, so if i always watched him, he would be the greatest player of all time.Great post. I was born in 80 and started playing baseball in 87 so I'm a little to young for those glory years, but I certainly remember those players. I remember being at my Grandparents house and watching the games with my Grandpa. He would turn the volume down on the television and turn on the radio so he could listen to Ernie Harwell call the game. Everything was analog back then so it synced up perfectly.
me too. grew up going to games in the $3 bleacher seats. I dont think Cecil's run was nearly long enough. but he gave us a couple awesome years.
that mid 80's tiger team gets no respect at all. not a single hall of famer when an argument can be made for 6 or 7.
Lou Whitaker- belongs
Alan Trammell- belongs
Lance Parrish- close, but not quite. had he stayed with the tigers, then maybe
Jack Morris- yes
Darrell Evans- close, close, but not quite. though you can argue him over many in now
frank tanana- hall of pretty good. had he not got hurt early in his career, he might of been a legend
chet lemon- no. but he stacks up nicely to jim rice
I was at a Tigers Orioles game around 1984 and Parrish got ahead of a change up and pulled it sharply into the stands behind third base. A fan was looking in the opposite direction and got hit and it sounded like the noise of a watermelon dropped from the top of the Chrysler Building hitting the sidewalk. They had an awesome team - I support putting Morris in the HOF - Trammell and Whitaker are close - shortstops are really hard to rank once you get by the first two or three, they are each better than some people in the HOF but that can't be the test or we would have thousands in there.
Darrell Evans is one of the hardest players to place because he played at multiple positions and very little of his offensive value is reflected in his batting average (lots of HRs and walks).