He's just putting on this charade so as to not disappoint his idol.The New York Times and The Washington Post have published stolen classified information in the past. Should they also be indicted?
He's just putting on this charade so as to not disappoint his idol.The New York Times and The Washington Post have published stolen classified information in the past. Should they also be indicted?
The New York Times and The Washington Post have published stolen classified information in the past. Should they also be indicted?
They were indicted and they fought for the right to publish the material.
Julian is not America and he is not a professional in the field. The stolen/classified material he released was not vetted. It was dumped en masse in an incredibly haphazard way that revealed the names of active duty soldiers and intelligence officials and operatives.
Much of the material was stolen through clandestine means by foreign and hostile governments and published with no regards to the source or even verifying the accuracy.
They were indicted and they fought for the right to publish the material.
Why do you hate whistleblowers?They were indicted and they fought for the right to publish the material.
Julian is not America and he is not a professional in the field. The stolen/classified material he released was not vetted. It was dumped en masse in an incredibly haphazard way that revealed the names of active duty soldiers and intelligence officials and operatives.
Much of the material was stolen through clandestine means by foreign and hostile governments and published with no regards to the source or even verifying the accuracy.
Actually he was hiding in an embassy because he was accused of sexual misconduct in Sweden. He used the US as a boogeyman to avoid those charges because he likely committed other crimes against the US in regards to releasing classified data and other stolen materials which will likely be a much steeper punishment and is rightfully being pursued by the US government.
Why do you hate whistleblowers?
Wait, is it because the Obama administration did?
How do you feel about the Donald Trump campaign Russian collusion investigation?
Imagine being such a shill for corrupt government interests that you actually take the governments side over the actual free media, which exposed corruption in that very government.Actually he was hiding in an embassy because he was accused of sexual misconduct in Sweden. He used the US as a boogeyman to avoid those charges because he likely committed other crimes against the US in regards to releasing classified data and other stolen materials which will likely be a much steeper punishment and is rightfully being pursued by the US government.
Why would they defend their more modernized and streamlined competition?He has basically been in prison for nothing for how long now?
And none of our mainstream media has defended him.
Hmmmm
If you concede the point, which you should do, it means you directly criticize Obama, something that appears to be incredibly difficult for you to do.How is receiving and publishing stolen, classified, and unvetted materials from hostile foreign governments whistleblowing?
What does Obama have to do with this?
If you concede the point, which you should do, it means you directly criticize Obama, something that appears to be incredibly difficult for you to do.
Tough spot to be in as I'd never expect a trumptard to concede a similar point. I thought you were better than this tbh
Why do you hate whistleblowers?
Wait, is it because the Obama administration did?
How do you feel about the Donald Trump campaign Russian collusion investigation?
We're talking about Assange, yes?You two should never bitch about another trumptard again. Obama is no longer president, you can take his nuts out of your mouths.
It's called a distractionWhat does that have to do with Assange publishing classified and stolen material?
Go and read up yourself, don't let others make your opinion for you:I don't really know much about Assange.
Would you say a valid criticism could be that he *selectively* releases information to punish people he doesn't like, or is it generally accepted that Wikileaks just publishes whatever they can get their hands on, regardless of who it affects or what kind of impact it may have?
Keep going dude, you're not self righteous and self important enough just yetList of people that I better not ever hear complain about corruption again, in any form, in any manner-
Quipling
Trotsky
Rational Poster
MC OverPressure
ShadowRun
*List subject to future updates
Go and read up yourself, don't let others make your opinion for you:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_material_published_by_WikiLeaks
List of people that I better not ever hear complain about corruption again, in any form, in any manner-
Quipling
Trotsky
Rational Poster
MC OverPressure
ShadowRun
*List subject to future updates