- Joined
- Dec 3, 2010
- Messages
- 33,256
- Reaction score
- 69,245
god damn!
It's a good idea for everyone to get ready in case. I think the UK and US will be the first to get hit though. Canada getting their ducks in a row if that's what it was isn't a terrible idea.True but funny they are letting their mind run wild. Fun side note that is like a hundred plus million of tanks just in the clip funny.
See, now you conveniently omit all the other quotes I just listed. Also, the comparative operator is still key "value's its troops lives more than civilians of whomever they've invaded." It's initiating a comparison, whether you want to frame that comparison as "Russia values Ukrainian civilians more than Russian troops" or "US values Ukrainian civilians less than American troops (by extension, more than Russia values Russian troops)", it still does the same operative work.It's a reference to Russia not caring about their troops.......
It's why I agreed with this
It's also why I said this
Seems the biggest difference is America value's it's troops lives more than civilians of whomever they've invaded. At the start of this invasion seems the Russians were far more willing to risk its troops lives when dealing with the civilians.
Conviently you leave that second part out every time.......
Considering you said
Looks like we agree. So.. mind sourcing me these projections?
god damn!
Toronto Canada got a scare where huge number of tanks traveling over a bridge for what Canada said moving for a training exercise. But during this time people were shocked. The official statement was training but people think something bad.
This would be a sick move
Great soviet BBQ machine.
See, now you conveniently omit all the other quotes I just listed. Also, the comparative operator is still key "value's its troops lives more than civilians of whomever they've invaded." It's initiating a comparison, whether you want to frame that comparison as "Russia values Ukrainian civilians more than Russian troops" or "US values Ukrainian civilians less than American troops (by extension, more than Russia values Russian troops)", it still does the same operative work.
So whether you frame it as Russians caring little about their own troops relative to civilians or a lot about civilians relative to their own troops, you're drawing a comparison. And I'm arguing that comparison is flawed. You continually beg for projections when it's obvious that this right here is the whole debate. You believe the Russians care more about civilians than Americans. Thus, you assert that they've been using "kid gloves" or that the casualties are low. I argue that you do not know that the casualties will be lower at the end of the invasion than the US, who allegedly doesn't use "kid gloves" and cares less about civilians. You need to prove that statement. I don't need to come up with projections that the casualties will be similar, equal, or greater. The dispute is around your characterization of the Russian army as caring about civilians more than the American army. You have still not proven that.
Well actually it is beeing blamed on Russian army officers in charge of the BUK that shot the civilian plane down.And then, suddenly, I remembered an interesting situation with some downed Boeing, blamed on Donbass separatists several years ago…
it appears the UA military are capturing Ak12s
Great soviet BBQ machine.
Seems like they are upgrading the shitty cages with shitty sandbags tho
Plenty of people opposed the war in Iraq in the UK. There were big protests about it. The more people are like you though, the more you can imagine it happening to you, and this is Europe ffs, the cradle of western civilization.
It would be weird if it were not so would it not?
These were stingers with seekers developed in 1978 th.Stinger missile did to Russian helicopters back during Russian War with Afghanistan