You're predicting Trumps future actions based on his past actions. Rookie mistake.Trump purposefully delayed the initial military assistance to Ukraine. He admitted as much. So I don't think he's really going to be staunch ally to Ukraine.
did you abuse a mentally handicapped woman or get abused by a mentally handicapped woman? you never cleared that up.Who is winning?
you making more fake accounts to like your posts? lmaodidn't know ukraine is part of finland...
also joining nato means being openly hostile towards russia, so if anything finland make themselves less safe by getting involved in something didn't concern them in 1st place
You're predicting Trumps future actions based on his past actions. Rookie mistake.
Personally I go with:
"What decision is Trump most likely to believe will have everyone call him a genius"
Even that's wrong half the time. Past actions? Gotta be sub 20% accuracy <Lmaoo>
I dunno man, I'd be wary leaving my fate to the guy who was in a wrestlemania not to hit me, his tag team partner in the back of the head with a steal chair because I was turning the crowd against us. And I don't think Putin considers himself a tag team partner.
Trump was at wrestlemania because he's a character already. "larger than life" or whatever. Unpredictable... no, no.
"A Maverick"
Jeez he'd almost jerk off to that. Like if a female said it to him it's for sure something he's remembering "for later".
Whatever he says goes. Democrats support is there, republicans cower at his almighty power over their base. He has the ultimate power.
Russia has a nuclear bluff.
A bluff against "A MAVERICK" a "MASTER NEGOTIATOR" who knows more than anyone on earth about: Climate Change, Making Money, Running a business, German Energy dependency (give him credit, knew more than the Germans) Fluffy Bunnies, Canoe Building and the Unladen Airspeed Velocity of BOTH the African AND European Swallow.
I wouldn't discard what he said at all. Pretty much fits his image to a T.
How pathetic can you get...unless you are getting paid for it that is.you making more fake accounts to like your posts? lmao
![]()
I think this is the biggest issue, aside from manpower. Ukraine is being far more careful with it's personnel because that is a resource with a clear finite supply.The attrition could last forever as neither country is able to destroy or capture the factories that make the materiel.
Idk the media articles have been strongly hinting that the US will start prodding Ukraine to begin negotiations.
Effectively Putler cannot continue at this pace through the winter into the spring the number of personal being lost and qualified soldiers to fight this war cannot be replaced quickly enough. It turns out Ukraine been slow walking the press as they know they will not have F16 fighters till the spring the earliest. Putler sees this as a time to plow bodies into the grinder in the hopes it creates questions about Ukrainian resolve and if the West can continue. Ukraine realized they need the fighter jets but also they managed to take out a major Russian asset that is within 2k of major bridge that if taken out would do huge damage to Russians efforts. Two storm shadows and two Ukraine made long range cruise missiles managed to get past Russian defenses and hit the warship.Your taxes are being stolen by politicians who don't give a shit about you and are giving your money to foreigners on the other side of the planet.
Did you actually change your avatar because I made fun of it?Your taxes are being stolen by politicians who don't give a shit about you and are giving your money to foreigners on the other side of the planet.
But realisticly, how long can Ukraine sustain if Russia doesn't back down?
I would seriously not assume that the whole country is as motivated to fight (in the areas occupied) as western media has led us to believe. 1) All the young people are mostly gone from those areas anyway and 2) the ones who were fanatically pro-UKR probably went west and joined the AFU already. Outside of some low level terrorism, I doubt there will be a serious insurgency in those areas.Here's how I see it and I'm no groundhog expert...
Russia hasn't even gotten to the hard part yet. The occupation of a hostile nation. To successfully occupy Ukraine, Russia would need to launch full mobilization. Period. Anything else just won't cut it and you can't quash a resistance with half-measures.
I was listening to someone in one of the alphabet agencies when he knew that Russia was going to invade. He called up his friend in and said "Hey! This is real! You need to get out NOW!"
His friend replied "No. This isn't 2014, things are VERY different now and we're not just going to roll over."
Now, the entire country has that mindset. As long as Ukraine exists, it's winning as Russia spends its blood and treasure in a vanity project for empire.
I would seriously not assume that the whole country is as motivated to fight (in the areas occupied) as western media has led us to believe. 1) All the young people are mostly gone from those areas anyway and 2) the ones who were fanatically pro-UKR probably went west and joined the AFU already. Outside of some low level terrorism, I doubt there will be a serious insurgency in those areas.
Also jeff monson has been seen in ukr
in ukraine? the occupied portions i presume? i know he had done some athletics related stuff in Donetsk region
what? When did you make fun of my avatar? (I changed my avatar about 5x)Did you actually change your avatar because I made fun of it?