They received Russian ASSISTANCE. Wher'd the Ukranians get all the weapons you love so much? The West. Does that the Ukranians don't exist?
Big countrys support various succession movements covertly and overtly. That does not mean the movements they are supporting aren't real.
Now, there is actually imo a very very good point here to be made, and i've seen you brush up against it before. And it doesn't take a historian, fake or not, to see that our own history of fostering coups and other bullshit should warrant extended conversations about double standards, subversion of the democratic process, and humanitarian crisis caused/engineered by deliberate geopolitical destabilization. Frankly, we pretty much ruined Latin America, or tried to, and there are major parallels between 70 years of direct US involvement in Latin America and Russian imperialist aggression in eastern Europe. But for some reason you can't seem to hold both of those turds in your hand at the same time without wanted to throw one and chow down on the other.
My god what a postThe reason is you're holding me up to values I have not expressed my support of especially not as a priority. I'm mad at the US coups because they overthrew my ideological peers and made the world a worse place according to my world view not because I believe in representative democracy and the sanctity of borders. My sense of right and wrong is not defined by following international law and I've never postured that it was. I am not an institutionalist I am an ideologue.
I want geopolitical destabilization because I do not support the current order thus I see it as a good thing. That is one of my main motives for supporting the Russians.
The "some reason" is you're holding me up to values I have not expressed my support of especially not as a priority. I'm mad at the US coups because they overthrew my ideological peers and made the world a worse place according to my world view not because I believe in representative democracy and the sanctity of borders. My sense of right and wrong is not defined by following international law and I've never postured that it was. I am not an institutionalist I am an ideologue.
I want geopolitical destabilization because I do not support the current order thus I see it as a good thing. That is one of my main motives for supporting the Russians.
The "some reason" is you're holding me up to values I have not expressed my support of especially not as a priority. I'm mad at the US coups because they overthrew my ideological peers and made the world a worse place according to my world view not because I believe in representative democracy and the sanctity of borders. My sense of right and wrong is not defined by following international law and I've never postured that it was. I am not an institutionalist I am an ideologue.
I want geopolitical destabilization because I do not support the current order thus I see it as a good thing. That is one of my main motives for supporting the Russians.
I mean, we're talking about a guy that doesn't think it's ethical for his parents to charge him rent
The "some reason" is you're holding me up to values I have not expressed my support of especially not as a priority. I'm mad at the US coups because they overthrew my ideological peers and made the world a worse place according to my world view not because I believe in representative democracy and the sanctity of borders. My sense of right and wrong is not defined by following international law and I've never postured that it was. I am not an institutionalist I am an ideologue.
I want geopolitical destabilization because I do not support the current order thus I see it as a good thing. That is one of my main motives for supporting the Russians.
Could have just said im an edgy contrarian. I dont like the popular thing. Which is how most of the people who support russia are.![]()
You're not a person to be taken seriously.
The "some reason" is you're holding me up to values I have not expressed my support of especially not as a priority. I'm mad at the US coups because they overthrew my ideological peers and made the world a worse place according to my world view not because I believe in representative democracy and the sanctity of borders. My sense of right and wrong is not defined by following international law and I've never postured that it was. I am not an institutionalist I am an ideologue.
I want geopolitical destabilization because I do not support the current order thus I see it as a good thing. That is one of my main motives for supporting the Russians.
Could have just said im an edgy contrarian. I dont like the popular thing. Which is how most of the people who support russia are.
Quite the contraryIt's wild you're in such a bubble you truly believe that my position isn't common.
It's wild you're in such a bubble you truly believe that my position isn't common.
Human beings are the worst animal on earth, it doesnt surprise me people would support a country who invades,kills, rapes, destroys cities , bomb civilians ,blow up dams etc, etc....people are sick
But it's ok when Russia kidnaps thousands and thousands of children because.... it makes the US look bad or whatever (???)People who support the US regime are awful I know.
Western Ukranians did(with CIA support) consistant with their voting patterns. You'll have no problem acknowledging that but easts political opinions are imaginary. When did the Donbass co sign said coup? Oh wait they didn't they staged an armed uprising you claim was just a Russian theatrical production.
People who support the US regime are awful I know.