A resume full of B and C level opponents isn't a good thing when discussing P4P #1. It might as well be filler opposition. Most people look at A level opponents and dip into B if necessary. There's no point in bothering with C level because they're by definition average or mediocre opposition. You actually think Porter is a better win than say AJ, Briedis, or Gassiev? You won't find many that agree with you on that one especially over the first two I just named. Remember these are The Ring's rankings. They have an entire panel dedicated to debating this topic. By disagreeing with me you're disagreeing with them. That is fine because it's subjective but only to a point and within reason. I keep asking you for a list of Crawford's best wins and you've named Porter. That's it. I mentioned Postol earlier. Who else is on there? What's funny is that for years I actually defended Crawford on here. I was the only reg to bother. I stopped defending him long ago because fans lost interest in him. I know I did (until he fights Spence). Crawford did fight the best at 135 and 140 but, again, when you look at the names it's underwhelming. I rattled off an entire list of them previously and none of them were particularly notable nor are they still relevant today (outside of Porter who just retired).