- Joined
- Jun 9, 2016
- Messages
- 2,230
- Reaction score
- 437
Whoever don't agree. Y'all must've forgot.
I'm okay with you saying that because the term great should be used less than it isHe is indeed very good. Just not great.
Hes a future ATGHe is indeed very good. Just not great.
That might be true I think as he stands he is just a sliver away from great. But if he keeps going forward which I expect he'll be great.Hes a future ATG
Same here, not the biggest fan but do look forward to his fights.Second best record among active boxers.
I’m not a huge fan, but he brings the goods.
Legal?all substance.
If he beats Kovalev at 175 (no catchweight BS), then he's firmly in the conversation of being the greatest Mexican boxer in history.
Because he ruined Golovkin's unblemished record.I don't understand why anyone wouldn't be a fan. .
If he won a championship at Lightheavy against one of the top 2 LHWs of the past decade, I can't imagine who you'd rate higher.He would belong on the list....but not the number 1 spot
Hes a future ATG