Let me first start off by saying I agree exactly with what acadameiachuteboxe said. I'd like to respond quickly to a few things that I think clearly present problems:
That would depend on what you mean by proof. If you're looking for absolute proof, well, there's no way. In fact, when you're talking absolute proof, there's really no way to even prove to me that you exist, because it is
possible that our senses deceive us.
As far as evidence goes, I could give evidence for Jesus' miracles, the resurrection, Biblical archaeology, etc. But it appears most people in here are interested in the actual existence of a higher power, and whether or not it's likely. I can offer 2 arguments that I think prove that there is SOMETHING beyond the physical, natural cosmos.
1. Where did energy come from? If we backtrack about 20 billion or so years to the big bang, all matter as we know it was packed into a "cosmic egg," and mysteriously exploded. There is no such thing as "time" before that point. The question is, how did it get there? Where did it come from? Why did it explode? Now keep in mind, this question cannot be reversed by saying "where did God come from?" The reason is, God is supernatural, and the author of nature. Everything that is natural is subject to the law of energy decay. Billions of years down the road cosmologists see an inevitable "heat death" of the universe--that is, everything will become homogenous and reach 0 kelvins. God is not subject to this law. It is illogical then, based on a specific timeframe (which God is not bounded by time anyway) to assume that God must have "come" from somewhere. God simply "IS." You cannot assume the same about the universe.
Also, for what it's worth, some of the world's most renowned cosmologists believe in God. Albert Einstein and Stephen Hawking, to name a few. While not Bible believing Christians, they do believe in a higher power that has put the universe in motion.
2. The design we see in the universe implies a designer. Natural selection cannot account for the advanced biological systems we see today. Sure, it can weed out harmful mutations and keep those that help survival of species, but it cannot specify the development of a more complex system. Mutations simply cannot do that.
Here's an example: If we were to find a complex spaceship that was so advanced and so unknown to mankind somewhere on earth, what should we assume? Obviously we would assume that someone built and designed it, whether humans or aliens. We would not assume it was just magically put together by earthquakes, storms, rain, and (of all things) erosion! Because scientists have adopted a purely naturalistic philosophy of explaining life, they cannot include the possibility that life came from something beyond nature. While many scientists (I am not exaggerating here--MANY scientists) acknowledge the flaws in the theory of evolution and the possibility of a designer, our increasingly secular society prohibits this.
hmm.....not really sure about that one. Could you clarify?
3-The world is not so great.
Think about this quote. Saying the world is no so "great" implies that it COULD really be great. If so, then you must acknowledge that there is a moral standard by which you can determine what is "great," and what is "not great," correct? Well if so, what IS that standard? Is it your standard? Where does it come from? What if I were to say to you that I think the world is as great as it could possibly be? Who would be correct, you or I? Without a universal standard, you cannot do this. Without the existence of a moral law giver (God), someone who defines the meaning of all that exists, we are unable to attribute real value to anything we see or care about. The value that we THINK we are attributing to something is really just the result of chemical processes going on in our brains. We came from stardust...we are the result of pure chance...everything is going to perish...we are simply just a unique combination of chemical compounds. How can anything then have real value? There must be something that gives it value...which brings me to the last point.
GOD IS THE ULTIMATE AXIOM. You cannot prove an axiom. An axiom is something that is self-evident...something that proof is BASED off of (I could go deeper into that if anyone wishes). If God is real, and He is the God the Bible describes, there is no way we can use the things of the earth to physically prove his existence, because He IS the reason for the existence of everything that is natural. To be able to do so would be to hold the things of the natural world on his level...and His level is nowhere NEAR the natural world. The only way God can be proven to someone is by first hand experience--by a relationship, that he offers through the death of Christ. "Now wait a minute," you are probably saying. If we are of the world and cannot be on the same realm as God and hence cannot prove his existence via naturalism, how can we ourselves, physical material and all, come in contact with something on such a higher plane? That's why Christ died and rose from the dead. To make such a relationship possible. And make no mistake, it's a relationship, it's no religion. Religion is when people try to earn their way to God by following a set of rules and being a good person. That is NOT what he has to offer...he offers so much more.
phew, okay I'm done for now.