Crime Ralph Yarl shooting.

[WklySportsMemes]

Have you no sense of irony... Rhetorical. You are one hate filled little weirdo. Then again you are a red belt. Your online time must eclipse the real worlds by an order of magnitude.

All that to say, "I can't counter any points on topic. You're twice the size of me and I'm an insecure text book incel who has to resort to childish drivel."
If you can't stay on topic stfu goof and miss me with your B.S.

 

[WklySportsMemes]

He's a shit stain for saying words you don't wanna hear.

Is his grandfather a shit stain for attempted murder?

This partisan fuckwittery is beyond ridiculous.

Grow the fuck up.

Writing "Satan" on social media and rocking cornrows is worse in his salad mind than shooting a kid in the face. Yet, he keeps accusing others of mental illness.... hmmmm interesting.

 

[nostradumbass]

I wouldn't 'stand and stare blankly at a door', I'd give it a couple of knocks and then leave. I also wouldn't check the windows, that's weird, I'm not really that investigative.

If the younger brother has no phone, I'm calling whoever sent me on this wild goose chase and making them double check the details.

That's just me.

The "he was a racist and just looking..." argument doesn't make any sense, you're right, but that's not where the 'racism' idea came from in the first place. That's the probable cause statement, and until that's somehow thrown out or disproven, it's the best we've got to go on. It doesn't really matter what you or I would do in that situation, and the speculation is irrelevant. There was an incident that actually did happen, and how that specific incident took place is all that now matters.

As for another hypothetical (I'm typing this right before I read it): Okay, so what I expect my wife would do (knowing her) is speak to the person through the door and establish what they want. I doubt that person is going to speak to my wife or an 84 year old man and think it's 'Party Town' and that his brother actually is at this address.

That's why it makes more sense that the probable cause was right, and the guy fired far too early. In which case, his life is forfeit and he's dying in prison.

But again: it will play out. That might not be exactly how it went down, in which case the old man needs to explain what the fuck he was thinking gunning someone down for pressing the wrong doorbell.

He got out of bed and grabbed his gun when the doorbell rang because really old people don't have visitors at 10pm. He didn't check to see what race the person was and then grab his gun, he didn't see the person at all when he grabbed it. He didn't mag dump on the guy, he shot twice and immediately called the police, and while police were at his house, he asked them for multiple updates on how the guy was doing.

As far as whether he goes to prison, that's not clear either. Just because Ralph Yarl didn't do anything wrong doesn't necessarily mean the old guy committed a crime. I don't believe it's required for a suspected burglar to enter the home, they just have to decide if it was reasonable for the person in the house to believe that's what was happening. They might rule that he didn't take enough steps to assess, but it's certainly not an unreasonable initial assumption.

Anthony Smith had a burglar show up and said his assumption when someone breaks in at night is that they wouldn't do it with people home if they weren't armed. Jon Jones also had someone outside his house and chased the guy down with a shotgun.

 

[Poon Goon]

He got out of bed and grabbed his gun when the doorbell rang because really old people don't have visitors at 10pm. He didn't check to see what race the person was and then grab his gun, he didn't see the person at all when he grabbed it. He didn't mag dump on the guy, he shot twice and immediately called the police, and while police were at his house, he asked them for multiple updates on how the guy was doing.

As far as whether he goes to prison, that's not clear either. Just because Ralph Yarl didn't do anything wrong doesn't necessarily mean the old guy committed a crime. I don't believe it's required for a suspected burglar to enter the home, they just have to decide if it was reasonable for the person in the house to believe that's what was happening. They might rule that he didn't take enough steps to assess, but it's certainly not an unreasonable initial assumption.

Anthony Smith had a burglar show up and said his assumption when someone breaks in at night is that they wouldn't do it with people home if they weren't armed. Jon Jones also had someone outside his house and chased the guy down with a shotgun.

When you put it this way it seems like this poor oldster is being railroaded. Thanks for such an unbiased and fresh perspective.

 

[KAZSoliloquy]

He got out of bed and grabbed his gun when the doorbell rang because really old people don't have visitors at 10pm. He didn't check to see what race the person was and then grab his gun, he didn't see the person at all when he grabbed it. He didn't mag dump on the guy, he shot twice and immediately called the police, and while police were at his house, he asked them for multiple updates on how the guy was doing.

lmao

 

[nostradumbass]

When you put it this way it seems like this poor oldster is being railroaded. Thanks for such an unbiased and fresh perspective.

When I "put it" like what's in the police report instead of you getting your information from race grifter Ben Crump and Huffington Post.

 

[koquerelle]

It still might prove as validation.

As I say, that kind of interview only informs us the world these people are from. The grandson might know the grandfather's views on such matters quite well. They also might not know, and are just soundboxing.

What remains important is the probable cause statement, which stated (not just implied) that there was a racial element.

The fact some family member has appeared (he might 1 of 20 grandchildren for all we know), and suggested he was racist because he fits a racist, Christian character profile is no reason for people worldwide to look to shit on that family member. He might well be wrong, but he might well be right. His bio doesn't tell us either way.

You're a damn good poster, possibly the strongest of the regular (what I would call) 'right wing' crew. You call me on a bunch of stuff, hopefully you likewise veer away from emotional MSM nonsense.

Why is it so important to prove the shooter was racist? He shot a fucking teen. Shouldn't that be the focus of the conversation?

A teen almost died. I don't care about the reasons. I care about justice for that kid. The old man needs to pay a price. That event will haunt that teen for the rest of his life.

 

[Poon Goon]

When I "put it" like what's in the police report instead of you getting your information from race grifter Ben Crump and Huffington Post.

I have no idea what Ben Crump or the Huffington Post have to say about any of this. My laughter was based off of your post alone. Breaking your back bending over to defend this guy.

 

[nostradumbass]

I have no idea what Ben Crump or the Huffington Post have to say about any of this. My laughter was based off of your post alone. Breaking your back bending over to defend this guy.

Lol, so you haven't read the police report, and "have no idea" what the lawyers for either side have to say about it, but you already know the guy is guilty based your emotion being more important than facts?

 

[KAZSoliloquy]

When I "put it" like what's in the police report instead of you getting your information from race grifter Ben Crump and Huffington Post.

taking the “this guy isn’t a racist, he’s just a murderous psychopath” defense is hilarious. you claim he didn’t even look to see who was at the door (which is unequivocally false according to both his statement and ralph’s) to paint a picture of “he can’t be racist, he didn’t even look at the guy before he started shooting”

 

[nostradumbass]

taking the “this guy isn’t a racist, he’s just a murderous psychopath” defense is hilarious. you claim he didn’t even look to see who was at the door (which is unequivocally false according to both his statement and ralph’s) to paint a picture of “he can’t be racist, he didn’t even look at the guy before he started shooting”

He didn't murder anyone, the guy isn't dead, so swing a miss there. And I said he grabbed his gun before he saw who was there, but reading doesn't seem to be one of your strengths.

 

[Poon Goon]

Lol, so you haven't read the police report, and "have no idea" what the lawyers for either side have to say about it, but you already know the guy is guilty based your emotion being more important than facts?

You said my post was based off of what Crump and Huffington were saying about this. I don't know what they are saying. I just read your post and laughed because you are obviously going out of your way to defend a dipshit.

You say that the oldster was awoken at 10pm as if this should matter. I don't give a fuck if he was 94 and the incident happened at 2am. Unless it can be proven that he lacks the capacity to understand what is going on then only a shithead would try to defend this.

 

[KAZSoliloquy]

He didn't murder anyone, the guy isn't dead, so swing a miss there.

he shot the kid in the fucking head twice and followed him outside when he was down for a third shot. the difference between murder and survival in this case isn’t his intent, it’s pure luck and incompetence on the shooters part. he was trying to kill the kid, obviously. he just failed.

 

[HunterAcosta]

taking the “this guy isn’t a racist, he’s just a murderous psychopath” defense is hilarious. you claim he didn’t even look to see who was at the door (which is unequivocally false according to both his statement and ralph’s) to paint a picture of “he can’t be racist, he didn’t even look at the guy before he started shooting”

“ how can I be racist when I don’t even look at the person Im going to shoot !? When I’m scared I just start spraying goddamnit ! What is there to understand ?! “

 

[nostradumbass]

he shot the kid in the fucking head twice and followed him outside when he was down for a third shot. the difference between murder and survival in this case isn’t his intent, it’s pure luck and incompetence on the shooters part. he was trying to kill the kid, obviously. he just failed.

Cool story, but you kind of have to kill someone to be a murderer. And nothing you posted is true. He wasn't shot 3 times or twice in the head, and the guy didn't follow him outside. He was shot through the storm door twice total, once in the head, once in the arm, and called the police when Yarl ran away.

 

[KAZSoliloquy]

Cool story, but you kind of have to kill someone to be a murderer.

i said murderous. not murderer. you don’t have to successfully murder someone to have the intent of murder.

 

[WklySportsMemes]

“ how can I be racist when I don’t even look at the person Im going to shoot !? When I’m scared I just start spraying goddamnit ! What is there to understand ?! “

"Yeah the person is a failed murder who would kill an innocent child. However, its a reach to consider him a racist because my whole posting agenda on Sherdog revolves around racism not existing. Who even cares if his grandkid says he's a racist chud."

 

[WklySportsMemes]

Why is it so important to prove the shooter was racist? He shot a fucking teen. Shouldn't that be the focus of the conversation?

A teen almost died. I don't care about the reasons. I care about justice for that kid. The old man needs to pay a price. That event will haunt that teen for the rest of his life.

Because the racism component has more to do with HIM NOT GETTING ARRESTED IN THE 1ST PLACE!!! They were literally not going to charge or arrest this guy who you clearly think needs to pay a price.

 

[jefferz]

He got out of bed and grabbed his gun when the doorbell rang because really old people don't have visitors at 10pm. He didn't check to see what race the person was and then grab his gun, he didn't see the person at all when he grabbed it. He didn't mag dump on the guy, he shot twice and immediately called the police, and while police were at his house, he asked them for multiple updates on how the guy was doing.

As far as whether he goes to prison, that's not clear either. Just because Ralph Yarl didn't do anything wrong doesn't necessarily mean the old guy committed a crime. I don't believe it's required for a suspected burglar to enter the home, they just have to decide if it was reasonable for the person in the house to believe that's what was happening. They might rule that he didn't take enough steps to assess, but it's certainly not an unreasonable initial assumption.

Anthony Smith had a burglar show up and said his assumption when someone breaks in at night is that they wouldn't do it with people home if they weren't armed. Jon Jones also had someone outside his house and chased the guy down with a shotgun.

So, according to you, old people don't get visitors at 10pm. What time should an old person be able to shoot someone on their porch, no questions asked. And what age is considered old?
If I'm 65, can I shoot someone on my porch after 10pm? What if I'm 70, does that mean I can shoot someone after 9pm? Does the time change the older that person gets?

 

[WklySportsMemes]

So, according to you, old people don't get visitors at 10pm. What time should an old person be able to shoot someone on their porch, no questions asked. And what age is considered old?
If I'm 65, can I shoot someone on my porch after 10pm? What if I'm 70, does that mean I can shoot someone after 9pm? Does the time change the older that person gets?

As soon as you get your AARP card you can shoot 1 black kid a month. Says so on the back. Its not just for discounts anymore.. As long as you are a good Christian and don't "mag dump" on him as nostradumbass has pointed out, the compassion and restraint this act of kindness.