- Joined
- Dec 6, 2012
- Messages
- 9,900
- Reaction score
- 0
chop chop fought both of them. he said provodnikov has zero chance
Molina shouldn't have had a chance either and he hurt Lucas badly. Matthysse has defence holes after and while he's punching which gaves accurate punchers plenty of chances to capitalize on and once he gets tagged he won't clinch because he's a puncher but fires back.
He can box but he can't just outbox you for 12 rounds he's a puncher and he won't do that he has skills but he has boxer-puncher skills with an emphasis on the "puncher" so he won't do an Algieri and just outpoint Provo.
Yes I have a thing for underdogs but I can really see how Provo could beat him not without taking punches himself but Lucas has taken more damage in his career than Provo and he has been seriously hurt before unlike Provo.
Provodnikov isn't that skilled for an high level guy in the pure boxing sense but while he is a pure puncher he is a skilled puncher and he is incredibly good at forcing exchanges and outpunching rather than outboxing other opponents.
For Chop Chop it is different because he is a boxer and he thinks like a pure boxer and compared to matthysse yes Provo isn't as skileld of a boxer but he is every bit as skilled of a puncher.
just look at the Bradley fight bradley is 20 times the boxer Provo is and he took insane amounts of damage and had a close fight with Provo.Yes Bradley could have fought smarter but it wasn#t only bradley who forced the exchanges but obviously also provo and here you can see that being the better boxer doesn't mean you are the better puncher (technically not power wise) and better in exchanges. Provo had better power than bradley but he was also slower and bradley had an insane chin power wasn#t the only reason Provo got the better of a lot of the exchanges punching (meaning exchanging) is also a skill