Elections Protestor calls black ICE agent the N word

Based on bills and laws passed by the democratic party and bills and laws blocked by the republican party, this clearly isn't true. Republican politicans have been dog whistling openly since Reagan.
"Dog whistling" seems to be the term used when no racist act is done or racist words are used. It almost always has some labrynthine historical explanation starting 40 or 50 years ago and what they "really mean" when they say something.
 
Based on bills and laws passed by the democratic party and bills and laws blocked by the republican party, this clearly isn't true. Republican politicans have been dog whistling openly since Reagan.
images
 
Last edited:
Eh who cares.

Dump people say dumb things all the time
 
Can't see the twitters

What did trump tell Rogan when he was busted for saying the n-word a hundred times ?

"Don't apologize!" Maga approved

Is the "ice agent" black?

If so he's probably numb to it, getting it from both sides
 
"Dog whistling" seems to be the term used when no racist act is done or racist words are used. It almost always has some labrynthine historical explanation starting 40 or 50 years ago and what they "really mean" when they say something.

It's convenient as well because you can say said racist thing is a "dog whistle" and you don't have to prove it apparently
 
Leftists are mad that their shit tier racial justice President is insulted in a meme, but totally okay with calling a black man enforcing the law the N word. You can't make this shit up.
Why do you have the same standards for a random looney on the street as you do for the POTUS?
 
Why do you have the same standards for a random looney on the street as you do for the POTUS?
Why aren't you as alarmed at a white Liberal "protester" screaming the N-word at a black agent, as you were some guy in MAGA hat smirking at an indian?

What are your standards again? Oh' right, racism is okay as long as it's coming from the "right" side, LOL.
 
It’s not justified. Now what. What conclusion should we draw from this answer now? What was the point of this thread?
They call us racists so we call them racists
 
You are a moron that latches on anything you can to call the Left xyz. Groups aren't some hive mind group. The title shouldn't be the Left calls, it is just one person calls an ICE employee a House N.
You can say that for every group
 
White Liberals are by far the worst racists

And even worse, they don’t even see it. They think they’re every minority’s savior because without the White Liberal, they believe these minorities wouldn’t be able to take care of themselves.

They have zero concept just how racist that thinking actually is



So of course they openly make vile racist comments to minorities who dare to be conservative

They feel justified in making them

I mean… just look at comments lefties in this forum make about black conservatives

The least of which is Uncle Tom and it gets worse from there

Like this video… liberals saying Voter ID is racist because minorities are incapable of getting IDs on their own… like minorities are mentally challenged or something



These people are actually putting themselves on a pedestal above them
 
You can say that for every group

Some more than others. For example, it appears that MAGA will support a child molester more than any other group. Al Franken couldn't even withstand an off-color joke, let alone molesting kids.
 
"Dog whistling" seems to be the term used when no racist act is done or racist words are used. It almost always has some labrynthine historical explanation starting 40 or 50 years ago and what they "really mean" when they say something.

I know this has been explained to you many times, but it's weird to hear you make that same claim despite the entire process having been explained by Lee Atwater.

The whole point is to be vague when you know your targets will either understand what you mean or believe what you want them to believe, all the while maintaining the veneer of deniability. This allows people like you to say "he didn't say that", while he gets his message across.

This was a documented conservative strategy expressed to Reagan, the previous acolyte of the Heritage Foundation. Trump has followed in his footsteps, except going as far as to quote Hitler: "Poisoning the blood of our country."

You start out in 1954 by saying, ":eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:, :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:, :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:." By 1968, you can't say ":eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:" – that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights, and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now, you're talking about cutting taxes. And all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me – because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this" is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than ":eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:, :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:." Lee Atwater
 
I know this has been explained to you many times, but it's weird to hear you make that same claim despite the entire process having been explained by Lee Atwater.

The whole point is to be vague when you know your targets will either understand what you mean or believe what you want them to believe, all the while maintaining the veneer of deniability. This allows people like you to say "he didn't say that", while he gets his message across.

This was a documented conservative strategy expressed to Reagan, the previous acolyte of the Heritage Foundation. Trump has followed in his footsteps, except going as far as to quote Hitler: "Poisoning the blood of our country."

You start out in 1954 by saying, ":eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:, :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:, :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:." By 1968, you can't say ":eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:" – that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights, and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now, you're talking about cutting taxes. And all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me – because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this" is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than ":eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:, :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:." Lee Atwater
Yes, its been explained to me, even by you. Thats how I came to the conclusion. Your post is doing literally what I said.

I dont know how it happened, but somewhere around Covid time its like you got locked into your house and did nothing but doomscroll and deep dive youtube conspiracies and you came out a completely changed person. You used to use actual arguments and argue them so that even when I disagreed I could see the logic. Now you just call conservatives stupid and say everything theyre doing is racist and anyone that doesnt agree is just ignorant. Somehow you became the same hateful person that populated forums like this, and you were never that guy before. I dont know how it happened, but its a goddamn shame.
 
Just the shit the Ice agents got to deal with every day . I am shocked there hasn't been more "accidental" killings of 'protesters" .

These are the idiots that cry but but but ...... they have to show their faces they csnt be masked - like they would wear masks if the left wasnt so fucking insane.
 
As long you're on our side we'll give you a N word pass. I remembered the :eek::eek::eek::eek: dude got shot by Kyle Rittenhouse was walking around screaming N word but no one mention about it
 
She should’ve just shopped him into a cartoon with monkey heads. Far more acceptable.
 
Yes, its been explained to me, even by you. Thats how I came to the conclusion. Your post is doing literally what I said.

I dont know how it happened, but somewhere around Covid time its like you got locked into your house and did nothing but doomscroll and deep dive youtube conspiracies and you came out a completely changed person. You used to use actual arguments and argue them so that even when I disagreed I could see the logic. Now you just call conservatives stupid and say everything theyre doing is racist and anyone that doesnt agree is just ignorant. Somehow you became the same hateful person that populated forums like this, and you were never that guy before. I dont know how it happened, but its a goddamn shame.

You say I don't present arguments, but when you say (absent an actual argument) that dog whistles don't really exist and I point out the exact moment a conservative leader describes why they HAVE to use them, you respond with nothing but personal attacks.

Do you think it's a fake quote? Do you think conservative politicians decided it was a bad idea and have abandoned racism for equality?

Did the Pentagon not remove pages for black medal of honor winners and replace the URLs with the words "DEI medals"?

Did the White House not just turn away black farmers from their farming conference, telling them DEI was over?

Did Donald Trump not just post a video of the Obamas as monkeys?

I have always liked you but it breaks my heart that you seem to think this is all acceptable. You dismiss me as peddling conspiracy theories but I do my level best to share things I sincerely believe, and listen to people who provide cogent rebuttals.

I know you almost certainly object to some of these events, but my criticisms address the situation that has made them all possible. I believe that's worse now than it has ever been before in my adult life.
 
Back
Top