Elections Pelosi pulling the hypocritical, hyperbolic (D) line about Trump not conceding really, really early

[nostradumbass]

My favorite example is when he made a ridiculous claim about SNAP usage growth (said it was up 600%-plus during a period when it was up around 30%), and then I corrected it and asked him if finding out that he was wrong by such a large margin caused him to re-evaluate his position. It did not, and he insisted that he wasn't wrong because the peak absolute (i.e., not growth) number was what it was, and then that he was right because usage doubled over a completely different, much longer, period. Predictably, he responded to the facts with childish personal attacks.

Literally 4 years ago I was right on my overall point about food stamps going up, but was off my 2 years on when it started to increase. That's your "win"? And no sir, YOU responded with chilidish personal attacks, I did not and do not. I said is it was from 2008-2014 and was off on the start date, and you decided to call me a piece of shit and said my parents are horrible parents while your own dragged you across the border without your consent. You're persona non grata here and your autism is showing.

 

[unimackpass]

I agree with Trotsky 100% in your sig. Republicans have brain damage. Who would want their child to marry someone with obvious brain damage?

Oh little zebby your so cute when TDS has you screaming while running in circles and flipping the bird.
2020 is going to be awesome.

 

[hillelslovak87]

Totally. I bet he'll have a 2 year FBI investigation to try to find some reason the election didn't go the way he wanted.

Wait, do you think that's what happened?

 

[Jack V Savage]

Literally 4 years ago I was right on my overall point about food stamps going up, but was off my 2 years on when it started to increase.

It's not right to say that a number went up by 600% when it went up by 30%. That's wrong by a very large margin.

That's your "win"?

Why are you using "win" in quotation marks? I gave that as my favorite (of many) illustrations of how incredibly dishonest you are. The fact that you're lying about it now only makes the example even better.

And no sir, YOU responded with chilidish personal attacks, I did not and do not. I said is it was from 2008-2014 and was off on the start date, and you decided to call me a piece of shit and said my parents are horrible parents while your own dragged you across the border without your consent. You're persona non grata here and your autism is showing.

I'm quite welcome here, thank you (even voted Best Poster in 2017). And it's news to me that my parents dragged me across any border. We used to go to Japan a lot, but we took planes. I do think your parents did a poor job, as they did not instill a sense of honor in you. Saying that someone has autism because they disagree with you is another example of childish insults (and you're literally copying that move from children who post to 4Chan--it's sad that a grown man does stuff like that, and it again leads one to question your upbringing).

 

[MikeMcMann]

Yep, everyone who doesn't agree with you is either dumb or dishonest. Amazing how that works. Not sure why people on here think you're smart when you're just an autistic conspiracy theorist with 65,000 posts on a karate forum.

ya but your spin has been dishonest. You start by suggesting it was Dem's who started the investigation when almost all those who started it and did the investigation where life long Republicans, and then you offer spin on the merits of the investigation.

There is no instance regardless of who is POTUS where :

1 - a foreign adversary gov't interferes and tries to affect the outcome of an election to benefit one candidate at the expense of the other
2 - the candidate and key members of his campaign team lie constantly about contacts, links and coordinations they have with said foreign adversary gov't at that same point in time
3 - the elected POTUS then does numerous things to try and obstruct and shut down any investigation into him

...that the candidate and his campaign should not be investigated. NONE.

Any one of the above, let alone all three in conjunction REQUIRE vigorous investigation.

 

[MikeMcMann]

He will accept the election results more graciously than what we have seen from the left.. Even if he talks stupid otherwise.

And in the end this is your only defense.

When Trump states over and over and suggests over and over that he would not accept a loss without calling it 'rigged' and threatening action from his 'tough' supporters, that is all just 'stupid talk'.

this conversation is kind of pointless, no, if you are going to say anything Trump himself says is just 'stupid talk'. If we cannot accept what Trump says, who can we accept on his behalf?

 

[Amerikuracana]

It's not nuts. There are plenty of warning signs and if he believes he's desperate he may attempt it. You know, like if the SDNY has a campaign finance case against him or prosecutors have an obstruction case against him he may feel compelled to keep the presidency to avoid prosecution.

People said the same about Obama. If trump loses the election, not withstanding an extremely close count that the media decides to call for establishment politician, trump would be normal about it. Some of you really do have tds.

 

[Amerikuracana]

And in the end this is your only defense.

When Trump states over and over and suggests over and over that he would not accept a loss without calling it 'rigged' and threatening action from his 'tough' supporters, that is all just 'stupid talk'.

this conversation is kind of pointless, no, if you are going to say anything Trump himself says is just 'stupid talk'. If we cannot accept what Trump says, who can we accept on his behalf?

I saw nothing in that first election he was in that would make me think he would try to overthrow the American government lmao.. This thread is worse than the jussie thread at the beginning. Media leaning politically destroys brains. It used to be fox news fan. Not anymore lol

 

[Amerikuracana]

There's nothing "right wing" about him.

He's a Left-wing Nutcase.

Yeah but he's to good of a left-wing nutcase. He makes the case for people leaving right these days. If he's a far right poster trying to away votes, he's damn good.

 

[kpt018]

People said the same about Obama. If trump loses the election, not withstanding an extremely close count that the media decides to call for establishment politician, trump would be normal about it. Some of you really do have tds.

Are you even reading what is said itt? If you were you wouldn't have made this ridiculous comparison.

 

[Amerikuracana]

Are you even reading what is said itt? If you were you wouldn't have made this ridiculous comparison.

If I were trump, I would literally be worried about CNN and pretty much the rest of the corporate media "calling it" way too early. That paranoia could be warranted. But no; if the election results were official, Donald trump would not declare himself king lol. I think he's basically telling CNN "You are not deciding this election."

 

[kpt018]

If I were trump, I would literally be worried about CNN and pretty much the rest of the corporate media "calling it" way too early. That paranoia could be warranted. But not, if the election results were official, Donald trump would not declare himself king lol. I think he's basically telling CNN "You are not deciding this election."

But he's openly questioned the integrity of elections several times. He's pushed conspiracy theories. And he did this for an election he won! It's not crazy to think he'd do the same for one he lost.

And I didn't address what you said here because the post is nonsensical.

 

[Amerikuracana]

But he's openly questioned the integrity of elections several times. He's pushed conspiracy theories. And he did this for an election he won! It's not crazy to think he'd do the same for one he lost.

And I didn't address what you said here because the post is nonsensical.

Well I'm not on Twitter. He's on my fb, and I don't see him questioning elections amd calling for republicans who lost to continue to pursue avenues to overturn the election. That's what the left does. That's what "resist" was about. Thats why there were screaming fat idiots at state capitals trying to keep trump from being put in office. THAT was the threat to our democracy. THAT was encouraged by the media, or at least not denounced. If the same had happened to Obama? Yeah..

The left is the current threat to our democracy. They, and many corporate entities, seem to want them to be "the state." I voted for Obama twice, and am completely independant; I'm not lying to you about this. Trump does say stupid crap sometimes.

And I fixed the one wrong word that made the post you quoted "total nonsense." *rolleyes*

 

[glenwo2]

People said the same about Obama. If trump loses the election, not withstanding an extremely close count that the media decides to call for establishment politician, trump would be normal about it. Some of you really do have tds.

I think Trump will tweet about it. Showing his disappointment but that's all he would do.

Pelosi and everyone else that believes her shit are delusional.

 

[MikeMcMann]

I saw nothing in that first election he was in that would make me think he would try to overthrow the American government lmao.. This thread is worse than the jussie thread at the beginning. Media leaning politically destroys brains. It used to be fox news fan. Not anymore lol

Right. No one is asking what you saw. The question is what did you hear?

I'll repeat my prior post and wait to hear if you heard what Trump was saying and if your only defense to that is "stupid talk" by Trump. So not that he is not saying it, just that you don't believe him.

And in the end this is your only defense.

When Trump states over and over and suggests over and over that he would not accept a loss without calling it 'rigged' and threatening action from his 'tough' supporters, that is all just 'stupid talk'.

this conversation is kind of pointless, no, if you are going to say anything Trump himself says is just 'stupid talk'. If we cannot accept what Trump says, who can we accept on his behalf?

 

[BarryDillon]

Seem this is what I'm taking about. Are you calling James Comey a "Trump appoitee"?

No, but I'm calling Rod Rosenstein a Trump appointee.

 

[Deleted member 185048]

Please provide the evidence that suggest Trump would happily relinquish the presidency. What in history gives you this idea. Real question that you WILL NOT answer. Full retard

I assure you , your the one that is in full retard mode emotional state. Calm down and take a deep breath tardlet.

 

[Jack V Savage]

I saw nothing in that first election he was in that would make me think he would try to overthrow the American government lmao.. This thread is worse than the jussie thread at the beginning. Media leaning politically destroys brains. It used to be fox news fan. Not anymore lol

You don't think that the president of the U.S. making accusations of massive voter fraud (as he did in the first one) that are both false and completely without any basis is something that would make you think that? The defense of Trump here is just based on the belief that he's such a clown that no one will take him seriously.

 

[Amerikuracana]

You don't think that the president of the U.S. making accusations of massive voter fraud (as he did in the first one) that are both false and completely without any basis is something that would make you think that? The defense of Trump here is just based on the belief that he's such a clown that no one will take him seriously.

I think indicating voter fraud exists is not = to overthrowing the government

 

[Jack V Savage]

I think indicating voter fraud exists is not = to overthrowing the government

Right, but the president falsely and recklessly claiming that millions of ineligible voters voted is a step toward that. He said that following a race he won before he took office. If a sitting president makes that kind of claim in a race he lost, we have a much bigger problem. Right? I'm not seeing why you can't admit that. The only way it's not a problem is if no one takes him seriously, which is its own problem (that we have a president who is regularly dismissed and quietly overrode by his own people).