- Joined
- Jan 24, 2013
- Messages
- 22,983
- Reaction score
- 3,304
So you hate all athletes.I hate drug cheaters in all sports.
So you hate all athletes.I hate drug cheaters in all sports.
athletes need to take the aussie swimmers approach.
sun yang has had multiple doping issues and stories of him smashing his blood vials that were collected by testers. mack horton was having none of that and did a silent protest by not acknowledging the cheaters 'win'. he stood off the winners podium when they were taking the pic of them because he didnt want to acknowledge a cheater as a winner. good on him i say. cheaters are cowards. like anderson and jones.
So you hate all athletes.
If you're aware of how the NFL, NBA, MLB, and NHL do their drug testing, this is completely inaccurate.contrary to what armchair sports fans who never train and only read a couple of stories on the internet think, there are a lot of athletes (yes, even successful ones) who aren't made of PEDs.
If you're aware of how the NFL, NBA, MLB, and NHL do their drug testing, this is completely inaccurate.
Well those four sports leagues make up 60% of the sports revenue in the world, making those the most prominent professional sports.in my country those sports aren't even things so that's certainly not what came to my mind when someone implied 'all athletes are on roids'
Well those four sports leagues make up 60% of the sports revenue in the world, so those are most of the prominent professional sports.
You seem stuck on a really stupid argument. The FAPL falls under the exact same category of what I was saying about sports leagues with collective bargaining agreements. Drug testing is a joke in all soccer leagues as well. Get a clue lolI guess it depends what you mean by 'prominent', because they also exist only in one country with global participation that ranges from patchy to nonexistant.
good point, made me think of gym rats in this day and age. i have worked out for about 25 years and especially in the last 10 years or so, roided up gym rats who are just big for the sake of being big, are rampant. in my experienceback in the day, there used to be 1-3 dudes who were bigger than everyone else and were visibly on gear. now there are at least dozens. over here (western Europe) you can literally ask at the counter at any commercial gym chain for steroids and you'll get them. accessible for everyone in this day and age.Of course, you really have to be either very naive ( or dumb ), or never have done any competitive sport, or both to believe physical feats like snatching 200kg or running a 9''58 100meters dash is anything close to natural. LOL
Goat at beating your favorite fighter's assGOAT of what, injecting steroids into his limp dick?
Not to mention in combat sports the added force/power will potentially hurt your opponent too.
You seem stuck on a really stupid argument. The FAPL falls under the exact same category of what I was saying about sports leagues with collective bargaining agreements. Drug testing is a joke in all soccer leagues as well. Get a clue lol
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/9600926/eleven-premier-league-stars-positive-drug-tests/Are you saying that there is no random testing by the FA?
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/jul/31/drug-testing-fa-premier-league-players
Sure bud and Santa claus is real.actually, only dishonest dirty athletes.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/9600926/eleven-premier-league-stars-positive-drug-tests/
Your article is 3 years old and deals in false promises. My article is 7 months old and deals with actual facts. Let me repeat. Drug testing in major sports leagues are purely for show.
lol, why does it seem like only the West gets so butt hurt over PEDs, who cares... it's part of high level athletics, it's always been that way and it will always continue being that way for years to come.
someone post the link to DC's incredibly sketchy tests in the past...........where he didn't fail for any steroids outright but just happen to somehow complete a camp and compete with the T levels of a 95 year old women during chemo therapy.
Yep. definitely nothing weird at all going on there.
I think MMA fans have an extremely short memory. DC, Lawler, etc, etc, etc, all have extremely suspect shit in their past but just because USADA hasn't officially caught them they get a free pass.
Listen, I'm gonna help you with the process of this. When a drug tester shows up looking for an athletes pee, the athlete has a choice. They can pee in the cup, or deny the tester. If an athlete denies the testing they are fined by the league and the tester will come back at another date and time. However what does not occur is the player is not suspended by the league until multiple violations have occurred. That is a standard clause in all sports leagues CBAs. The players unions have intentionally protected themselves from sports league's drug testing, and the leagues have no intention of ever fighting those players rights because a "clean" game is not the purpose of drug testing in sports. Protecting themselves from legal ramifications is. The leagues would also have to give up something of immense value to get the change rectified, like a larger percentage of the revenue to player wages, and that's not going to happen.I’m simply responding to your argument that sports with CBAs don’t conduct random testing.
You can definitely be suspicious of the FAs claims and of the athletes being cleared, but you haven’t provided any concrete evidence of this. All you have in that article is Pound’s opinion. Of course, his assessment is not something I take lightly, but even though he is often right, he is also known for talking out of his ass.
PS: It’s ironic that you are using the opinions of someone like Pound to prop up your attitude of laissez-faire towards PEDs.