Here is another case in point that I want to bring up to those in disagreement with ross' performance or the whole 'don't leave it in the hands of the judges' / 'didn't do enough' disagreeing argument.
While those disagreements are true in some cases, with Ross it wasn't - like I've explained he fought an effective, clear winning strategy. It was wise and deserved the W.
Luke Barnette vs. Sean Strickland last weekend is a fight and controversial decision that I would agree to the whole 'don't leave it in the hands of the judges' or 'should have done more' argument. I bet on Strickland, but obviously got damn lucky as I think Barnatte was robbed of a decision.
Yet unlike the diego / pearson robbery, I think that Barnatte could have done more and didn't fight to a smart strategy. While Strickland was backpeddling most the fight, barnatte was not necessarily engaging from the outside and taking it to Strickland. He fought too conservative and tried to blame Strickland for not fighting. While there is some truth to that, I also think there is some truth to the fact that barnatte did nor pursue as much as he could have and did not go for fight ending flurries that were there. Simply put, he did not fight to a good strategy and should have utilized more / done things differently to not let it go to the judges.
Ross did enough, and did enough to clearly win a decision. You cannot blame him for fighting the strategy he did an for it going to the scorecards; it was effective, damaging, well planned, and a winner.
Strange usually when Dana feels the decision was wrong he usually pays the fighter. It's happened in the past for far less controversial decisions. Why not now?
See the fight was IMHO 30-27 clearly for Ross. But you can't just sit back and counter the way he did. He had multiple chances to really put a stamp on the fight and he didn't.
Dude...Ross won. The point is, he was fighting in a fighters home country and hometown, on top of being a fan and company favorite.
It should not play the factor in a fight but it does. Pearson did not have room to back pedal. He did not have room to WAIT FOR DIEGO TO COME TO HIM to beat him up. Diego was throwing alot of punches and kicks (not as accurate of COURSE) but he was pushing the pace the entire TIME. He controlled the pace of the fight. He left room to win the fight. Pearson did not do every he could have to win in the eye's of the already bias judges.
Guess what happens win you fight to win like that? I can't stress Machida vs Rampage enough
Dude...Ross won. The point is, he was fighting in a fighters home country and hometown, on top of being a fan and company favorite.
It should not play the factor in a fight but it does. Pearson did not have room to back pedal. He did not have room to WAIT FOR DIEGO TO COME TO HIM to beat him up. Diego was throwing alot of punches and kicks (not as accurate of COURSE) but he was pushing the pace the entire TIME. He controlled the pace of the fight. He left room to win the fight. Pearson did not do every he could have to win in the eye's of the already bias judges.
Guess what happens win you fight to win like that? I can't stress Machida vs Rampage enough
And I'm sick of hearing that, "don't leave it in the hands of the judges" bullshit. There should be a change made to reduce or eliminate these kinds of obvious mistakes.
I won some money off sanchez, I almost feel bad taking the money.
Dude... You are delusional if you think it wasn't diego backpeddling half that fight and if you think diego 'controlled the pace of the fight', c'mon guy get out of here with that nonsense it was all ross ALL THREE ROUNDS. He countered and also went on the offensive plenty. I can't believe you don't see the hypocrisy in what you're saying, the other thread user called you out for the same thing - What you just described above for pearson's performance, which isn't true, could be applied to Diego's performance as well. You are contradicting, or you saw a completely different fight from what I saw.
Using Machida / page as a comparison is also ludicrous - completely different fight, numbers / punches thrown, different styles, and different way it played out.
Ross did enough, and if you blame him or think he did not do enough to win then I'm calling you a crazy fool. Sorry for resorting to the name calling but its warranted here.
looks like he has to go back to his acting roots.
Yeah I 100% expected Dana to publicly state he gets win money.
Dude your butthurt, its okay. You can talk like your nuts are big. But you're so butthurt that your blind rage confused you to the fact that I said Ross won.
But Ross could have done more to close the gap on the decision from the already bias judges (Obviously...he lost). It wasn't a clean crisp win and that's what he didn't do and that's why your ass is hurt bitching on sherdog about it. Welcome to reality.
What you fanboys forget is that this isn't point karate. This isn't point wrestling. This is a CAGE FIGHT and sometimes that's how the judges view the fight. Is it right? Is it accurate? Fuck NO! and it needs to be explored but what can you do other than "leave no room" for the judges to see you WON the fight!