Patterson Gimlin Bigfoot Video

"Quit wasting bandwidth" said the biggest shit poster in Mayberry.

Stay in the Sports Bar where at least you're useful for making fun of, here it's just sad and no one pays you any attention.
O look another weirdo conspiracy theory loner on this forum. Ya like I really want attention attention from goobers like you. Go watch some more JFK conspiracy videos you wannabe tough guy.
 
O look another weirdo conspiracy theory loner on this forum. Ya like I really want attention attention from goobers like you. Go watch some more JFK conspiracy videos you wannabe tough guy.
It's extraordinary that you have nothing else better to do then to be a complete fukface on an anonymous message board

Says more than you're willing to admit about yourself
Keep that chin up and be proud while you crawl back into your memories of abuse lol
 
It's extraordinary that you have nothing else better to do then to be a complete fukface on an anonymous message board

Says more than you're willing to admit about yourself
Keep that chin up and be proud while you crawl back into your memories of abuse lol
 
Probably the 5th time you've said you were leaving Yet Lo and behold here you are sunshine....

what a dong
 
"]
Tribalz quoted that he thought that this was similar to the costume that was used in PG film

bf411-patterson-film-deblurred-back-to-297_orig.gif



200.gif
 
Last edited:
I struggle to see some of the finer detail in the video that some folk have pointed out. Given it was filmed by amateurs in the 60's, that shouldn't be surprising, I guess.

This said, something that always looks really suspect to me is that big ol' bigfoot butt. To me it looks like it doesn't move at all. Surely the ass on a lass as thicc as that would move more while they walk away from us?
 
Great. I've Derren Browned myself into wanting to find some bigfoot porn.
 
Linking a paper written by Jeff Meldrum, wherin he examines various casts, and discusses the PG film as well (pg 71).

Midfoot Flexibility, Fossil Footprints, and Sasquatch Steps: New Perspectives on the Evolution of Bipedalism

Abstract—The chimpanzee foot is flexible near its middle, it can bend about the axis of the transverse tarsal joint, whereas the human foot is a comparatively rigid arched platform. Flexion at the transverse tarsal joint—the ‘‘midtarsal break’’—uncouples the functions of a grasping, or prehensile, forefoot and a propulsive hindfoot during grasp-climbing on vertical or inclined supports. At some point after the transition to habitual bipedalism, these grasp-climbing adaptations were compromised by the evolution of the longitudinal arch, which permits increased mechanical advantage of the flexors of the ankle and improved endurance for long-distance walking and running. Ape, human, and Plio-Pleistocene hominid footprints were examined for the effects of a midtarsal break. The human footprint reflects arched-foot architecture, combined with a stiff-legged striding gait. Pressure releases occur at particular locations behind the ball and the great toe, or hallux. Early (ca. 3.5 million years ago) hominid footprints from the Laetoli excavation confirm midfoot flexibility, including repeated suggestion of an associated pressure ridge. The Terra Amata footprint (ca. 400,000 years ago), yet to be fully published, exhibits evidence of midfoot flexibility. Several footprints attributed to an alleged North American ape, commonly known as sasquatch, exhibit a distinctive midtarsal pressure ridge and other indications of midfoot flexibility. In the Patterson-Gimlin film, the feet of the film subject correlate with the kinematics inferred from the footprints, in that a midtarsal break is present. Additional independent examples corroborate the consistent presence of this feature, including examples of half-tracks that record contact beneath the foot only anterior to the midtarsus. These data provide a fresh perspective from which to consider the pattern and timing of the emergence of the distinctive features of modern human bipedalism and bear on the credibility of the possible existence of sasquatch. The observed and inferred sasquatch locomotor anatomy parallels the stable adaptations that marked the greater span of early hominid bipedalism.

http://www.scientificexploration.org/docs/18/jse_18_1_meldrum.pdf
 
Last edited:
You think a guy wearing pants or sweats with pockets could show that much physiological movement? How dense can you be in actualjudgement ? It's almost funny the ignorance

there are so many variables you aren't even considering
This isn't even a matter of denial or confirmation bias

I actually want to debunk this video But what you're suggesting is straight laughable
You clearly don't want the video debunked. If what you say that's it clearly nothing but physiological movement and nothing else then it's bigfoot or samsqanch or what every you want to call the primate... shouldn't it be enough evidence for you to believe they are real? There's divide in the scientific community if it's real, if it's absolutely nothing but muscles movement, herniating tendons no human has ever and can never walk like that etc then there would be a consensus that it's a unknown primate or hominid in the footage. But there's not because the footage is just too shitty to say one way or another.

You still haven't addressed how you thought yoga pants were some big leaps and bounds invention of the modern era and tights and spandex never existed in the 60s. You talk in absolutes without any real knowledge of your subject matter.

Look dude not saying it's not real but I can't say it's real on such crappy video. I'd also love for bigfoot to be real.
 
I struggle to see some of the finer detail in the video that some folk have pointed out. Given it was filmed by amateurs in the 60's, that shouldn't be surprising, I guess.

This said, something that always looks really suspect to me is that big ol' bigfoot butt. To me it looks like it doesn't move at all. Surely the ass on a lass as thicc as that would move more while they walk away from us?
Same. people be like "omg you can see the muscles contract. OMG look you can even see a HENRIA on its thigh, you cant fake that!!!!!!!"

and I'm just like

<{vega}>



I've made it petty clear that I dont believe in this bigfoot stuff at all. But I will say I've been researching a case today that I find pretty damn fascinating.

PORTLOCK ALASKA

Back in the 1930s Portlock was a remote mining town on an isolated peninsula in Alaska. Had about 200 residents. Well, hunters would go into the woods to hunt and go missing. Only to later be found dismembered and bludgeoned to death in a nearby lake. Happened over and over again. One man was attacked by something and got this living shit beat out of him until his dog started going bonkers and managed to scare the attacker off long enough for him to escape. As he was running away he turned back to look at whatever did it to him. When he got back he said it was a giant, hairy beast man before he died from his injuries.

It started happening so frequently that the ENTIRE TOWN decided to pack up and leave. They didn't bother contacting any state authorities for help, they just said "nah, fuck this" and every single one of them left. Even today, decedents of those that lived in Portlock straight up refuse to go back.


Was it an ultra aggressive bigfeeter? Ehh....but still fascinating.
 
Same. people be like "omg you can see the muscles contract. OMG look you can even see a HENRIA on its thigh, you cant fake that!!!!!!!"

and I'm just like

<{vega}>



I've made it petty clear that I dont believe in this bigfoot stuff at all. But I will say I've been researching a case today that I find pretty damn fascinating.

PORTLOCK ALASKA

Back in the 1930s Portlock was a remote mining town on an isolated peninsula in Alaska. Had about 200 residents. Well, hunters would go into the woods to hunt and go missing. Only to later be found dismembered and bludgeoned to death in a nearby lake. Happened over and over again. One man was attacked by something and got this living shit beat out of him until his dog started going bonkers and managed to scare the attacker off long enough for him to escape. As he was running away he turned back to look at whatever did it to him. When he got back he said it was a giant, hairy beast man before he died from his injuries.

It started happening so frequently that the ENTIRE TOWN decided to pack up and leave. They didn't bother contacting any state authorities for help, they just said "nah, fuck this" and every single one of them left. Even today, decedents of those that lived in Portlock straight up refuse to go back.


Was it an ultra aggressive bigfeeter? Ehh....but still fascinating.
Listen to the pod I linked just above and let me hear your thoughts It will explain the physiological observation s a lot better than I can and Makes a good case as to why this is unlikely a man in a suit

one of the guys on the show was very skeptical of the video but came out with a different perspective after they completed the shows contents

it's well done if nothing else and vetted
 
Last edited:
Look at 6:00 at the OP's video. Who the fuck moves their foot like that when they walk? After he steps, it looks like he's lifting his foot so it doesn't drag on the ground. Like he's wearing a giant shoe or something that's unnaturally big. Also why is his foot so.. flat on the top? Where's the arch gong down to the toes?
 
Look at 6:00 at the OP's video. Who the fuck moves their foot like that when they walk? After he steps, it looks like he's lifting his foot so it doesn't drag on the ground. Like he's wearing a giant shoe or something that's unnaturally big. Also why is his foot so.. flat on the top? Where's the arch gong down to the toes?
Cant tell if you are arguing for or against this being a big feeter. Which is it?
 
Back
Top