- Joined
- Feb 2, 2008
- Messages
- 14,451
- Reaction score
- 10,476
Nailed it. This is exactly why I can’t support the idea of its existence.Which would mean even more physical evidence of their existence would be visible, yet no physical evidence has ever been found.
Bears? Yep. Deer? Of course. Beavers? Sure thing. Cougars, wolves, bobcats, sheep, squirrels? Yes, yes, yes, yes and yes.
All of these leave behind traces of physical evidence.
But no physical evidence of any kind to suggest that Bigfoot walks the Earth, now or ever.
Ditto for the Abominable Snowman, Loch Ness Monster, or even Chupacabras.
Instead, the folklore surrounding these are used for three purposes: entertain such as tales told around a campfire, generate income in the form of tourist traps or to scare misbehaving children.
There is actually no proof.
But that ain’t no dude in a monkey suit in that PGF film that’s all I know
