Patterson Gimlin Bigfoot Video

[BluntForceTrama]

no shit. I think every single person that has read the thread understands your stance guy.....you think its bigfoot even if you wont say it outright. I and many others are just having a riot at the reason you list why you feel that way. its not complicated, you don't have to break it down.

"I'm not saying its bigfoot. I'm just saying its not a human in costume is all"

ok, the fuck is it then guy? a horse?


god. I made it a goal to not be a jerk in 2021 but I cant help but say something when some of the proof of this video's "legitimacy" includes walking in a straight line in an open area and turning your head. jesus christ

I know your brain demands answers right away otherwise you can't sleep at night
But as a logical person who knows how comprise an argument and who doesn't believe in Bigfoot, my srgument is what it is and is prerty bare bones I'm not a conspiracy guy and a disciple of Occam's Razor

if you can't figure out what I'm saying then I'm not going to teach you


(I don't believe in any of this election conspiracy BS, not a flat earther or chem trails, wasn't going along with UFOs until David Fravor and his tic tacs I consider myself not crazy )

 

[IloveTHIS]

I know your brain demands answers right away otherwise you can't sleep at night
But as a logical person who knows how comprise an argument and who doesn't believe in Bigfoot, my srgument is what it is and is prerty bare bones I'm not a conspiracy guy and a disciple of Occam's Razor

if you can't figure out what I'm saying then I'm not going to teach you

<Lmaoo><Lmaoo><Lmaoo><Lmaoo><Lmaoo>

alright man thanks for the compromise. really got the best of me there with your "im not saying its bigfoot but its not human is all" middle fence riding neutral stance.

 

[BluntForceTrama]

god. I made it a goal to not be a jerk in 2021 but I cant help but say something when some of the proof of this video's "legitimacy" includes walking in a straight line in an open area and turning your head. jesus christ

that's actually what makes this video so cool

out in the open with predictable movement

there isn't anything else like it


Makes it a bit easier to study don't you reckon?

 

[lilianjie]

Bigfoot was born from a hoax.
A log cutter guy thought it would be fun to make some giant size feet and press them out in the mud. Then millions of signings followed that.

 

[NewS]

guy buys a camera and says "Im gonna make a video about bigfoot" and just so happens to capture video of bigfoot the very next day. fascinating. how is he so lucky and no one else is?

It was a hot spot

 

[rex kramer]

 

[BluntForceTrama]

Lol ^^^^^

 

[Sirwastealot]

I don't know what's more interesting, the random stories of a possible large primate running around in the bush, or the way people get seriously pissed off at others for entertaining the possibility.

Yea that's always been odd to me. People get offended by it. This should be interesting stuff either way you look at it.

This video still looks like a man in a suit to me, probably something more elaborate going on inside the suit to add those little details that make it seem human. But its still possible it could be real, i'm not ready to rule out that possibility. Some of the supporting arguments are pretty convincing.

 

[The_Renaissance]

Yea that's always been odd to me. People get offended by it. This should be interesting stuff either way you look at it.

This video still looks like a man in a suit to me, probably something more elaborate going on inside the suit to add those little details that make it seem human. But its still possible it could be real, i'm not ready to rule out that possibility. Some of the supporting arguments are pretty convincing.

This is what I don't get either. What harm is it doing? I don't understand why people get so vehement and argumentative about the fact that some people believe in bigfoot etc? The view is hardly being forced on other people, or being adopted by the media as potential fact etc. It's a bloody bit of harmless fun really, I don't see the need to get into arguments about it.

 

[BearGrounds]

I'm the OP of this thread . I've actually been looking for those videos but could not remember the names of them for the life of me (Freeman)

I think the videos above are true hoaxes and are typical of what you've gotten outside of the PG video . What's interesting to me is that they're both relatively recent when compared to The PG video. You'll notice how the depicted creature is always obscured and never clearly seen . Not like PG . And to me these are what clearly look like men in gorilla suits. My other point being those are Truly cheap shitty monkey suits

so compared to PG which was shot in 1967 by two simpletons there's a clear difference in what's being presented

the PG video imo is a true anomaly

Fair enough. I think there's a good chance they're authentic. It's less likely to get an unobscured video than it is a clear one, when dealing with an elusive forest dwelling creature. The PG film subject is unique in that they caught it on a sandbar, where there's less foliage for it to dip behind.

crazy how a dog that is conveniently strapped with a gopro can find a bigfoot out in the open no problem with it not even trying to run away from it. but none of the millions and millions of hunters around the world ever stumble up close to one with a high powered hunting rifle and kill it.

I've had to point this fallacious reasoning out to you before, but I'll do it again. There are stories of hunters shooting them. Just because a body has never been delivered into the hands of the mainstream scientific establishment, and thereafter made public, doesn't mean one has never been shot and killed.

Moose hunter shoots "bigfoot" to death
https://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=9552

Also, you might be surprised, but not all hunters are keen on killing one after having seen it.



William Roe, a trapper. British Colombia

"The thought came to me that if I shot it I would probably have a specimen of great interest to scientists the world over," Roe said. But he couldn't bring himself to pull the trigger on his rifle. "Although I have called the creature 'it,' I felt now that it was a human being, and I knew I would never forgive myself if I killed it," he said.

Bill Webster Northern Ontario 1982 while moose hunting.

"This huge club came smashing down through the brush and you can imagine how amazed I was. It was a good-sized limb. If it had hit me I sure would not be here. I could see a small amount of black hair through the brush, black hair like a bear, but it was higher than my head. I took the safety off my .308 and held it where his chest would be if required to shoot. I stood frozen."

The animal left quietly but, following its silent departure, it threw five large rocks in Bill's direction: "I counted them: one, two, three, four, five --some big. I said to myself, 'Bill, you better get out of here or you're going to be killed.' I had to retreat to the road."

Leaving the knoll, Bill began walking along the logging road. By now the day was getting warm and, just as he reached up to unbutton the top on his shirt,

"Out he came right in front of me. I had the telescope of my rifle sighted at his vertebrae and could have downed him easily, but couldn't do it. I hollered at him because I wanted to see his face but he just walked away."

"It was big - seven or eight feet tall. Its legs were short, but its arms were long. They hung down to its legs. It's shoulders were wide. The sides of the neck went straight up to the head. Its head was rounded. It's hair was dark, not jet black but sort of brownish-black. The hair was not real long - one to two inches, like a dog, not shaggy. It walked on two feet, upright, just like a man. I couldn't see its face because it was walking away from me. It walked slowly as if it wasn't in a hurry."

Above quotes pulled from biologist John Bindernagel's (RIP) book, "The Discovery of the Sasquatch".

The dog's lack of reaction is a bit troubling, I'll admit that, and that's my major hang up with that particular video. Often in encounters you'll hear of dogs becoming intensely scared (below is a video of an account where the man's hunting dog was permanently ruined by an encounter), and this dog didn't respond much at all.



Some dogs are just stupid and oblivious though, so it's not impossible that some dog just derpping around through the woods luckily crossed by one. Chance encounters happen, and that video may in fact be one.

"Best cosmetic costumes we have today" lost credibility at that moment .

How? That's the opinion of some of the top people in the industry, not mine specifically. There are some experts that disagree.

 

[superpunch]

Yes, but the difference is Floresiensis has been dead for 12,000 years. It's understandable that after 12k years remains would be hard to find. Something that is supposedly still living would be much easier to find traces of.

Homo Floresiensis was around until recent modern times. The last archeological evidence is 12,000 - 50,000 years ago but the natives of the island have much more recent oral records of the creature. They recount how they killed it off too.

They're extinct because we killed them. You can infer from that what happened to other human species that lived alongside homo sapiens like neanderthals.. So, it would make sense, if Bigfoot is real, that Bigfoot is instinctually very reclusive and stealthy. Otherwise, it would have met the same fate as those other human species a long time ago.

I made a post a while ago. Let me find it.

Here:

Here's a tale that the native people of Flores island have been telling for at least a few hundred years:

The Nage people of Flores describe the Ebu Gogo as having been able walkers and fast runners around 1.5 m tall. They reportedly had wide and flat noses, broad faces with large mouths and hairy bodies. The females also had "long, pendulous breasts".[2] They were said to have murmured in what was assumed to be their own language and could reportedly repeat what was said to them in a parrot-like fashion.[3]

The legends relating to the Ebu Gogo were traditionally attributed to monkeys, according to the journal Nature.[4]. (Note: 1800s Europeans attributed the stories to monkeys. They didn't know what Homo Floresiensis was, of course.)

An article in New Scientist gives the following account of folklore on Flores surrounding the Ebu Gogo: in the 18th century, villagers gave the Ebu Gogo a gift of palm fiber to make clothes, and once the Ebu Gogo took the fiber into their cave, the villagers threw in a firebrand to set it alight, killing all of the occupants (one pair may have fled into the forest).[5][6]

There are also legends about the Ebu Gogo kidnapping human children, hoping to learn from them how to cook. The children always easily outwit the Ebu Gogo in the tales.

Check out a humanoid species that scientists discovered remains of on... Flores island:
Homo floresiensis ("Flores Man"; nicknamed "hobbit"[2]) is a pygmy archaic human which inhabited the island of Flores, Indonesia, until the arrival of modern humans about 50,000 years ago.

Hmm... What did these pygmy people look like?

Remember: "The Nage people of Flores describe the Ebu Gogo as having been able walkers and fast runners around 1.5 m tall. They reportedly had wide and flat noses, broad faces with large mouths and hairy bodies. The females also had "long, pendulous breasts"."

There's a full body reconstruction of one but it's kinda NSFW since it's nude. It also has the "long, pendulous breasts."

 

[superpunch]

The problem is that Bigfoot's evolutionary path just doesn't make any sense. There are accounts of it in the Old World (Asia, Europe, Africa) like yeti and even in China. So, how did it get to the Americas? Are we to truly believe that it crossed the Alaskan land bridge? Or that it built boats?

 

[minute bull]

I don't know what's more interesting, the random stories of a possible large primate running around in the bush, or the way people get seriously pissed off at others for entertaining the possibility.

This IS entertaining the possibility. This is what entertaining a myth looks like when there's no definitive proof. Talk about anything and there's bound to be shit talkers. Welcome to the snowflakery. Just because I've conned myself into something doesn't mean any of you have to come along with me, and none of you have.

 

[kenetics]

Fair enough. I think there's a good chance they're authentic. It's less likely to get an unobscured video than it is a clear one, when dealing with an elusive forest dwelling creature. The PG film subject is unique in that they caught it on a sandbar, where there's less foliage for it to dip behind.


I've had to point this fallacious reasoning out to you before, but I'll do it again. There are stories of hunters shooting them. Just because a body has never been delivered into the hands of the mainstream scientific establishment, and thereafter made public, doesn't mean one has never been shot and killed.

Moose hunter shoots "bigfoot" to death
https://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=9552

Also, you might be surprised, but not all hunters are keen on killing one after having seen it.



William Roe, a trapper. British Colombia

Bill Webster Northern Ontario 1982 while moose hunting.

Above quotes pulled from biologist John Bindernagel's (RIP) book, "The Discovery of the Sasquatch".

The dog's lack of reaction is a bit troubling, I'll admit that, and that's my major hang up with that particular video. Often in encounters you'll hear of dogs becoming intensely scared (below is a video of an account where the man's hunting dog was permanently ruined by an encounter), and this dog didn't respond much at all.



Some dogs are just stupid and oblivious though, so it's not impossible that some dog just derpping around through the woods luckily crossed by one. Chance encounters happen, and that video may in fact be one.



How? That's the opinion of some of the top people in the industry, not mine specifically. There are some experts that disagree.

Because those experts don't want to admit that million dollar movie studies make great cosmetic costumes for movies and could easily make a bigfoot costume lol

 

[BluntForceTrama]

Because those experts don't want to admit that million dollar movie studies make great cosmetic costumes for movies and could easily make a bigfoot costume lol

In 1967? It's pretty obvious you haven't bothered researching this Im sure you haven't the time
Either that or you're extremely close minded

either way you made your point and I'll respect it Not everyone gets it

 

[revoltub]

The problem is that Bigfoot's evolutionary path just doesn't make any sense. There are accounts of it in the Old World (Asia, Europe, Africa) like yeti and even in China. So, how did it get to the Americas? Are we to truly believe that it crossed the Alaskan land bridge? Or that it built boats?

They swam

 

[Pittie Petey]

The Homo Floresiensis women are retarded hairy midgets. Neanderthal women look like Mark hunt with a wig. Maybe I can see why someone would be into Bigfoot women, but it's not for me. So is it safe to say homo sapiens have the hottest women? But then why do we have neanderthal in our DNA, who was banging them?

Have you ever seen Jerry Springer?

 

[minute bull]

The Homo Floresiensis women are retarded hairy midgets. Neanderthal women look like Mark hunt with a wig. Maybe I can see why someone would be into Bigfoot women, but it's not for me. So is it safe to say homo sapiens have the hottest women? But then why do we have neanderthal in our DNA, who was banging them?

I think we ate the Neanderthals, and you know what they say about what you take into your body.

 

[kenetics]

In 1967? It's pretty obvious you haven't bothered researching this Im sure you haven't the time
Either that or you're extremely close minded

either way you made your point and I'll respect it Not everyone gets it

Do you know how many bigfoot shows, documentaries come out every year for the past 30+yrs?

You have "bigfoot experts" in all of them and they can never produce no concrete evidence every year. It's the same old story.

Are people really this naive to continue to believe that there was a bigfoots? I guess they don't die huh? We can't find their bones but we find bones from the jurrasic era lol.

Unbelievable.

 

[minute bull]

Unbelievable.

Is it really unbelievable that people who sell themselves on notions that cannot be disproven -- that they are impervious to logic and reason?