- Joined
- Oct 10, 2009
- Messages
- 7,526
- Reaction score
- 46
I see it kind of differently in that who wants to support a company who can't even get their system into the hands of customers who want to pay for it? It has been 3 months now and most places still don't have a single Switch on the shelf. Would you want to risk all that money in creating a port for a system which so far isn't looking very good? Not to mention it's processing power isn't even on par with consoles which came to market 4-5 years ago... that's a lot of work and a tough sell for most game producers.
I'm not going to lie I'm curious about the Switch and semi-interested, but right now it's totally on the back burner because outside of BoTW and maybe Mario Kart I'm not interested in a single game. Even if I wanted one I'd rather not have to deal with people selling them in back alley's or meeting in Best Buy parking lots. haha Perhaps once there's a reasonable supply in stores and many more people have them gaming companies would willing to take the risk, but right now I think it's just way too risky to put any kind of money into developing for the Switch for most game developers. Guess we'll see what happens but I wouldn't hold my breath.
They're competing for parts with freaking Apple. That's the level of demand for the Switch and I don't under the, "a system which so far isn't looking very good" comment since by all metrics the system is selling RIDICULOUSLY well and garnering all of the positive Word of Mouth there is. The point about processing power while valid CAN be circumvented so it just comes back to the question of why with regards to 3rd Party devs.